Life-course insecurity among young adults: Evidence for variation by employment status?

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 Medicine
Lin Rouvroye , Aart C. Liefbroer
{"title":"Life-course insecurity among young adults: Evidence for variation by employment status?","authors":"Lin Rouvroye ,&nbsp;Aart C. Liefbroer","doi":"10.1016/j.alcr.2023.100562","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Previous research suggests that lack of employment security can lead young adults to experience a higher degree of insecurity with regard to their future life. We test the relationship between life-course insecurity, i.e. worrisome feelings with regard to one’s own future, and young adults’ employment status using a newly developed measurement instrument. Furthermore, we examine whether, in terms of life-course insecurity, specific groups of young people are more affected by insecure employment conditions based on their structural position. Survey data (n = 1087) were collected within a Dutch representative panel among those aged 18–35. Structural equation modelling is used to construct latent dependent variables for experienced insecurity in four life domains, namely ‘work’, ‘finances’, ‘partner and family’ and ‘leisure and personal development’. Results show that, while controlling for gender, life phase, education level and level of neuroticism, lack of employment is associated with higher insecurity in all four domains of life. Precarious employment based on a flexible contract is associated with higher insecurity regarding ‘work’, ‘finances’ and ‘partner and family’. Moreover, we find the relationship between lack of employment and life-course insecurity to be stronger for young people in the 26–35 age bracket. However, higher educational attainment does not attenuate the positive relationship between precarious employment and life-course insecurity. The findings of this study inform our theoretical understanding of agency within the life course of young adults by signaling insecure labour market attachment as a potential constraint to formulating plans for the future.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47126,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Life Course Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Life Course Research","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1040260823000370","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research suggests that lack of employment security can lead young adults to experience a higher degree of insecurity with regard to their future life. We test the relationship between life-course insecurity, i.e. worrisome feelings with regard to one’s own future, and young adults’ employment status using a newly developed measurement instrument. Furthermore, we examine whether, in terms of life-course insecurity, specific groups of young people are more affected by insecure employment conditions based on their structural position. Survey data (n = 1087) were collected within a Dutch representative panel among those aged 18–35. Structural equation modelling is used to construct latent dependent variables for experienced insecurity in four life domains, namely ‘work’, ‘finances’, ‘partner and family’ and ‘leisure and personal development’. Results show that, while controlling for gender, life phase, education level and level of neuroticism, lack of employment is associated with higher insecurity in all four domains of life. Precarious employment based on a flexible contract is associated with higher insecurity regarding ‘work’, ‘finances’ and ‘partner and family’. Moreover, we find the relationship between lack of employment and life-course insecurity to be stronger for young people in the 26–35 age bracket. However, higher educational attainment does not attenuate the positive relationship between precarious employment and life-course insecurity. The findings of this study inform our theoretical understanding of agency within the life course of young adults by signaling insecure labour market attachment as a potential constraint to formulating plans for the future.

年轻人生命历程中的不安全感:就业状况差异的证据?
先前的研究表明,缺乏就业保障会导致年轻人在未来生活中经历更高程度的不安全感。我们使用一种新开发的测量工具测试了生命过程中的不安全感,即对自己未来的担忧感,与年轻人的就业状况之间的关系。此外,我们还研究了在生活过程中的不安全方面,特定群体的年轻人是否因其结构性地位而更容易受到不安全就业条件的影响。调查数据(n=1087)是在荷兰的一个代表小组中收集的,年龄在18-35岁之间。结构方程模型用于构建四个生活领域中体验不安全感的潜在因变量,即“工作”、“财务”、“伴侣和家庭”以及“休闲和个人发展”。结果表明,在控制性别、生活阶段、教育水平和神经质水平的同时,在生活的所有四个领域,缺乏就业都与更高的不安全感有关。基于灵活合同的不稳定就业与“工作”、“财务”和“伴侣和家庭”方面的不安全感更高有关。此外,我们发现,对于26-35岁的年轻人来说,缺乏就业和人生不安全感之间的关系更为密切。然而,更高的教育程度并没有削弱不稳定的就业和人生道路不安全之间的积极关系。这项研究的结果通过表明不安全的劳动力市场依恋是制定未来计划的潜在制约因素,为我们对年轻人生命过程中的能动性的理论理解提供了信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Life Course Research
Advances in Life Course Research SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.90%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Advances in Life Course Research publishes articles dealing with various aspects of the human life course. Seeing life course research as an essentially interdisciplinary field of study, it invites and welcomes contributions from anthropology, biosocial science, demography, epidemiology and statistics, gerontology, economics, management and organisation science, policy studies, psychology, research methodology and sociology. Original empirical analyses, theoretical contributions, methodological studies and reviews accessible to a broad set of readers are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信