Focal mechanism of Luding M 6.8 earthquake, September 2022 and analysis of the loading role of the tectonic stress on the seismogenic fault

Yansong Hu, Zhenyue Li, Ruifeng Liu, Zibo Wang
{"title":"Focal mechanism of Luding M 6.8 earthquake, September 2022 and analysis of the loading role of the tectonic stress on the seismogenic fault","authors":"Yansong Hu,&nbsp;Zhenyue Li,&nbsp;Ruifeng Liu,&nbsp;Zibo Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.eqrea.2023.100216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To reveal the seismogenic mechanism of the Luding earthquake, we employed the 118 China Seismic Network stations to collect the P-wave polarity data from each station, which was then used in the P-wave first motion approach to calculate the focal mechanism solution of the <em>M</em>6.8 Luding earthquake that occurred on September 5, 2022. We have also studied the loading effect of tectonic stress on the Luding earthquake fault based on the stress field data for the research area. The results indicate that this earthquake was a strike-slip type, the nodal plane I: strike 167°, dip Angle 78°, slip Angle 2°; Nodal plane Ⅱ: strike 77°, dip Angle 88°, slip Angle 168°. The two fault planes’ instability coefficients of the Luding earthquake are examined considering the region’s background stress field’s condition. The nodal plane I in the Moho circle is discovered to practically coincide with the Coulomb failure line and the tangent point of the Moho circle, indicating that this nodal plane has a high instability coefficient compared to the nodal plane II. The conclusion is that the nodal plane I has a higher likelihood of being the seismogenic fault plane, which is congruent with the seismogenic fault plane suggested by the aftershock distribution, the earthquake radiation energy distribution of a single station, and seismic intensity distribution. The Luding earthquake’s focal mechanism is highly like the theoretical focal mechanism of the fault situated at the location where the Coulomb failure line intersects the Mohr circle, demonstrating that background stress is what caused the earthquake. The substantial fault instability and similarity between the solved and theoretical focal mechanisms make it easier to comprehend the loading effect of tectonic stress on the Luding earthquake fault.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100384,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Research Advances","volume":"3 3","pages":"Article 100216"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Research Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772467023000131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

To reveal the seismogenic mechanism of the Luding earthquake, we employed the 118 China Seismic Network stations to collect the P-wave polarity data from each station, which was then used in the P-wave first motion approach to calculate the focal mechanism solution of the M6.8 Luding earthquake that occurred on September 5, 2022. We have also studied the loading effect of tectonic stress on the Luding earthquake fault based on the stress field data for the research area. The results indicate that this earthquake was a strike-slip type, the nodal plane I: strike 167°, dip Angle 78°, slip Angle 2°; Nodal plane Ⅱ: strike 77°, dip Angle 88°, slip Angle 168°. The two fault planes’ instability coefficients of the Luding earthquake are examined considering the region’s background stress field’s condition. The nodal plane I in the Moho circle is discovered to practically coincide with the Coulomb failure line and the tangent point of the Moho circle, indicating that this nodal plane has a high instability coefficient compared to the nodal plane II. The conclusion is that the nodal plane I has a higher likelihood of being the seismogenic fault plane, which is congruent with the seismogenic fault plane suggested by the aftershock distribution, the earthquake radiation energy distribution of a single station, and seismic intensity distribution. The Luding earthquake’s focal mechanism is highly like the theoretical focal mechanism of the fault situated at the location where the Coulomb failure line intersects the Mohr circle, demonstrating that background stress is what caused the earthquake. The substantial fault instability and similarity between the solved and theoretical focal mechanisms make it easier to comprehend the loading effect of tectonic stress on the Luding earthquake fault.

2022年9月泸定6.8级地震震源机制及构造应力对发震断层的加载作用分析
为了揭示泸定地震的发震机制,我们利用118个中国地震台网台站收集了每个台站的P波极性数据,然后将其用于P波初动方法,计算了2022年9月5日发生的泸定6.8级地震的震源机制解。根据研究区的应力场资料,研究了构造应力对泸定地震断层的加载作用。结果表明,本次地震为走滑型,节点面I:走向167°,倾角78°,滑移角2°;节点平面Ⅱ:走向77°,倾角88°,滑移角168°。考虑区域背景应力场条件,对泸定地震的两个断层面的失稳系数进行了检验。发现莫霍圆中的节点平面I实际上与库仑破坏线和莫霍圆的切点重合,表明与节点平面II相比,该节点平面具有较高的不稳定性系数。结论是,节点平面I是发震断层平面的可能性较高,这与余震分布、单站地震辐射能分布和地震烈度分布所暗示的发震断层面一致。泸定地震的震源机制与库仑破坏线与莫尔圆相交处断层的理论震源机制非常相似,表明背景应力是导致地震的原因。断裂的实质不稳定性以及所求解的震源机制与理论震源机制的相似性,使人们更容易理解构造应力对泸定地震断层的加载作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信