A case-based reasoning method of recognizing liquefaction pits induced by 2021 MW 7.3 Madoi earthquake

Peng Liang , Yueren Xu , Wenqiao Li , Yanbo Zhang , Qinjian Tian
{"title":"A case-based reasoning method of recognizing liquefaction pits induced by 2021 MW 7.3 Madoi earthquake","authors":"Peng Liang ,&nbsp;Yueren Xu ,&nbsp;Wenqiao Li ,&nbsp;Yanbo Zhang ,&nbsp;Qinjian Tian","doi":"10.1016/j.eqrea.2022.100182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Earthquake-triggered liquefaction deformation could lead to severe infrastructure damage and associated casualties and property damage. At present, there are few studies on the rapid extraction of liquefaction pits based on high-resolution satellite images. Therefore, we provide a framework for extracting liquefaction pits based on a case-based reasoning method. Furthermore, five covariates selection methods were used to filter the 11 covariates that were generated from high-resolution satellite images and digital elevation models (DEM). The proposed method was trained with 450 typical samples which were collected based on visual interpretation, then used the trained case-based reasoning method to identify the liquefaction pits in the whole study area. The performance of the proposed methods was evaluated from three aspects, the prediction accuracies of liquefaction pits based on the validation samples by kappa index, the comparison between the pre- and post-earthquake images, the rationality of spatial distribution of liquefaction pits. The final result shows the importance of covariates ranked by different methods could be different. However, the most important of covariates is consistent. When selecting five most important covariates, the value of kappa index could be about 96%. There also exist clear differences between the pre- and post-earthquake areas that were identified as liquefaction pits. The predicted spatial distribution of liquefaction is also consistent with the formation principle of liquefaction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100384,"journal":{"name":"Earthquake Research Advances","volume":"3 1","pages":"Article 100182"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earthquake Research Advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772467022000732","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Earthquake-triggered liquefaction deformation could lead to severe infrastructure damage and associated casualties and property damage. At present, there are few studies on the rapid extraction of liquefaction pits based on high-resolution satellite images. Therefore, we provide a framework for extracting liquefaction pits based on a case-based reasoning method. Furthermore, five covariates selection methods were used to filter the 11 covariates that were generated from high-resolution satellite images and digital elevation models (DEM). The proposed method was trained with 450 typical samples which were collected based on visual interpretation, then used the trained case-based reasoning method to identify the liquefaction pits in the whole study area. The performance of the proposed methods was evaluated from three aspects, the prediction accuracies of liquefaction pits based on the validation samples by kappa index, the comparison between the pre- and post-earthquake images, the rationality of spatial distribution of liquefaction pits. The final result shows the importance of covariates ranked by different methods could be different. However, the most important of covariates is consistent. When selecting five most important covariates, the value of kappa index could be about 96%. There also exist clear differences between the pre- and post-earthquake areas that were identified as liquefaction pits. The predicted spatial distribution of liquefaction is also consistent with the formation principle of liquefaction.

基于案例推理的2021 MW 7.3地震液化坑识别方法
地震引发的液化变形可能导致严重的基础设施破坏以及相关的人员伤亡和财产损失。目前,基于高分辨率卫星图像的液化坑快速提取研究较少。因此,我们提供了一个基于案例推理方法的液化坑提取框架。此外,使用五种协变量选择方法对高分辨率卫星图像和数字高程模型(DEM)生成的11个协变量进行滤波。该方法使用基于视觉解释收集的450个典型样本进行训练,然后使用训练后的基于案例的推理方法识别整个研究区域的液化坑。从三个方面对所提出方法的性能进行了评价,即基于kappa指数验证样本的液化坑预测精度、地震前后图像的比较、液化坑空间分布的合理性。最后的结果表明,不同方法排序的协变量的重要性可能不同。然而,最重要的协变量是一致的。当选择五个最重要的协变量时,kappa指数的值可能约为96%。地震前和地震后被确定为液化坑的区域之间也存在明显的差异。预测的液化空间分布也符合液化的形成原理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信