Effects of high-intensity interval training versus sprint interval training during the second wave of COVID-19 lockdown on soccer players

IF 1.1 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
Thomakos Pierros , Konstantinos Spyrou
{"title":"Effects of high-intensity interval training versus sprint interval training during the second wave of COVID-19 lockdown on soccer players","authors":"Thomakos Pierros ,&nbsp;Konstantinos Spyrou","doi":"10.1016/j.apunsm.2023.100414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aimed to compare the effects of two intervention programs (i.e., high-intensity interval training [ΗΙΙΤ] versus sprint interval training [SIT]) during the second wave of pandemic COVID-19 in semi-professional soccer players. Twenty-nine male soccer players were divided into two groups: HIIT (N: 16, age: 19.6 ± 2.4 years, height: 1.8 ± 0.5 m, weight: 71.5 ± 4.6 kg, and body fat: 7.3 ± 2.6%), who performed a HIIT protocol with progressive intensity and resistance training; SIT (N: 13, age: 23.5 ± 5.1 years, height: 1.8 ± 0.1 m, weight: 74.0 ± 4.5 kg and body fat: 8.8 ± 2.6%) that performed a SIT program combined with body weight circuit training. According to the instructions from World Health Organization of basic protective measures against COVID-19, each session did not exceed 60 min. Aerobic capacity (Yo–Yo IR1) and countermovement jump (CMJ) height were measured before and after a 4-week intervention period. Aerobic variables (maximum oxygen uptake [V̇O<sub>2max</sub>], velocity at V̇O<sub>2max</sub> [vV̇O<sub>2max</sub>] and CMJ significantly increased (<em>p</em>&lt;0.001), while maximum heart rate [HRmax] decreased (<em>p</em>&lt;0.01) following the HIIT intervention program. Conversely, values remained unchanged in the SIT group after the training. Post-evaluation between-group comparisons revealed that V̇O<sub>2max</sub> was significantly higher in HIIT when compared to SIT (<em>p</em>&lt;0.05). These results suggest that HIIT combined with resistance training, in different sessions, could lead to superior improvements in endurance and vertical jump ability in short time periods when compared to the combination of SIT and body-weighted strength training in semi-professional soccer players.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100113,"journal":{"name":"Apunts Sports Medicine","volume":"58 218","pages":"Article 100414"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apunts Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666506923000135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the effects of two intervention programs (i.e., high-intensity interval training [ΗΙΙΤ] versus sprint interval training [SIT]) during the second wave of pandemic COVID-19 in semi-professional soccer players. Twenty-nine male soccer players were divided into two groups: HIIT (N: 16, age: 19.6 ± 2.4 years, height: 1.8 ± 0.5 m, weight: 71.5 ± 4.6 kg, and body fat: 7.3 ± 2.6%), who performed a HIIT protocol with progressive intensity and resistance training; SIT (N: 13, age: 23.5 ± 5.1 years, height: 1.8 ± 0.1 m, weight: 74.0 ± 4.5 kg and body fat: 8.8 ± 2.6%) that performed a SIT program combined with body weight circuit training. According to the instructions from World Health Organization of basic protective measures against COVID-19, each session did not exceed 60 min. Aerobic capacity (Yo–Yo IR1) and countermovement jump (CMJ) height were measured before and after a 4-week intervention period. Aerobic variables (maximum oxygen uptake [V̇O2max], velocity at V̇O2max [vV̇O2max] and CMJ significantly increased (p<0.001), while maximum heart rate [HRmax] decreased (p<0.01) following the HIIT intervention program. Conversely, values remained unchanged in the SIT group after the training. Post-evaluation between-group comparisons revealed that V̇O2max was significantly higher in HIIT when compared to SIT (p<0.05). These results suggest that HIIT combined with resistance training, in different sessions, could lead to superior improvements in endurance and vertical jump ability in short time periods when compared to the combination of SIT and body-weighted strength training in semi-professional soccer players.

第二波封锁期间高强度间歇训练与短跑间歇训练对足球运动员的影响
本研究旨在比较在第二波新冠肺炎大流行期间,两种干预方案(即高强度间歇训练[SIT]和短跑间歇训练[SITE])对半职业足球运动员的影响。29名男性足球运动员被分为两组:HIIT(N:16,年龄:19.6) ± 2.4岁,身高:1.8 ± 0.5 m、 重量:71.5 ± 4.6 kg,体脂:7.3 ± 2.6%),他们进行了具有渐进强度和阻力训练的HIIT方案;SIT(N:13,年龄:23.5 ± 5.1岁,身高:1.8 ± 0.1 m、 重量:74.0 ± 4.5 体重和体脂:8.8 ± 2.6%),其执行SIT程序并结合体重回路训练。根据世界卫生组织关于新冠肺炎基本防护措施的指示,每届会议不超过60 min。在4周干预期前后测量有氧能力(Yo–Yo IR1)和反跳(CMJ)高度。HIIT干预方案后,有氧变量(最大摄氧量[V̇O2max]、V \775 O2max[vVṆO2max]和CMJ)显著增加(p<0.001),而最大心率[HRmax]下降(p<0.01)。相反,SIT组的数值在训练后保持不变。组间比较后评估显示,与SIT相比,HIIT中的V̇O2max显著更高(p<0.05)。这些结果表明,在不同的训练中,HIIT与阻力训练相结合,与半职业足球运动员的SIT和体重力量训练相结合相比,可以在短时间内提高耐力和垂直跳跃能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信