Use of analgesics in professional soccer players: A systematic review

IF 1.1 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
Thomas Zandonai , Juan José Lozano , Mónica Escorial , Ana M. Peiró
{"title":"Use of analgesics in professional soccer players: A systematic review","authors":"Thomas Zandonai ,&nbsp;Juan José Lozano ,&nbsp;Mónica Escorial ,&nbsp;Ana M. Peiró","doi":"10.1016/j.apunsm.2023.100415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Use of painkillers appears to have become a widespread issue in the sporting environment as athletes pursue successful pain relief during competitions. We conducted a systematic review on the prevalence of analgesics use in soccer, using literature from January 1980 to July 2021.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>The systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. Studies were obtained from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (WOS) databases. In total, 213 articles were found where 14 were selected. The risk of bias was assessed using the NIH scale for prevalence studies and the PEDro quality scale for randomized control trials (RCTs).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Less than 3% of the literature were randomized studies (n=10 observational; n=4 double-blind trials) and only 2 studies included females. At least 54% of the research subjects consumed analgesic drugs during the course of their tournaments, and nearly half of them (39-67%) did so before each match, mostly in the form of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (15% of daily use).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Given that short-term observational studies indicated high consumption of analgesics despite limited evidence of their pain control effectiveness, the question is raised whether this potential drug abuse affects the sexes at the same rates and in the same ways. Further investigation into these specific cohorts is needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100113,"journal":{"name":"Apunts Sports Medicine","volume":"58 219","pages":"Article 100415"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apunts Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666506923000147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Use of painkillers appears to have become a widespread issue in the sporting environment as athletes pursue successful pain relief during competitions. We conducted a systematic review on the prevalence of analgesics use in soccer, using literature from January 1980 to July 2021.

Methods

The systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. Studies were obtained from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (WOS) databases. In total, 213 articles were found where 14 were selected. The risk of bias was assessed using the NIH scale for prevalence studies and the PEDro quality scale for randomized control trials (RCTs).

Results

Less than 3% of the literature were randomized studies (n=10 observational; n=4 double-blind trials) and only 2 studies included females. At least 54% of the research subjects consumed analgesic drugs during the course of their tournaments, and nearly half of them (39-67%) did so before each match, mostly in the form of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (15% of daily use).

Conclusion

Given that short-term observational studies indicated high consumption of analgesics despite limited evidence of their pain control effectiveness, the question is raised whether this potential drug abuse affects the sexes at the same rates and in the same ways. Further investigation into these specific cohorts is needed.

职业足球运动员镇痛药的使用:系统回顾
随着运动员在比赛中寻求成功缓解疼痛,止痛药的使用似乎已成为体育环境中的一个普遍问题。我们使用1980年1月至2021年7月的文献,对足球中镇痛药的使用率进行了系统综述。方法系统综述遵循PRISMA指南。研究来自Cochrane图书馆、PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science(WOS)数据库。总共发现213篇文章,其中14篇被选中。使用NIH量表进行患病率研究,使用PEDro质量量表进行随机对照试验(RCTs)评估偏倚风险。结果只有不到3%的文献是随机研究(n=10观察性;n=4双盲试验),只有2项研究包括女性。至少54%的研究对象在比赛期间服用止痛药,其中近一半(39-67%)在每场比赛前服用,主要是非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)(占日常使用的15%)。需要对这些特定群体进行进一步调查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信