Effects of different intensities of FIFA 11+ on physical performance of U-15 soccer players

IF 1.1 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
João B. Ferreira-Júnior , Irismar Gonçalves Almeida da Encarnação , Vitor Hugo Santos Rezende , Jeann Carlos Gazolla Oliveira , Lucas Augusto Souza , José Carlos Assunção , Amir Hossein Ahmadi Hekmatikar , Daniel Barbosa Coelho
{"title":"Effects of different intensities of FIFA 11+ on physical performance of U-15 soccer players","authors":"João B. Ferreira-Júnior ,&nbsp;Irismar Gonçalves Almeida da Encarnação ,&nbsp;Vitor Hugo Santos Rezende ,&nbsp;Jeann Carlos Gazolla Oliveira ,&nbsp;Lucas Augusto Souza ,&nbsp;José Carlos Assunção ,&nbsp;Amir Hossein Ahmadi Hekmatikar ,&nbsp;Daniel Barbosa Coelho","doi":"10.1016/j.apunsm.2023.100419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present study investigated the effects of different intensities of FIFA11+ on the physical performance of U-15 soccer players. Eighteen U-15 soccer players (13.3 ± 0.7 years) performed five randomized conditioning activities (CA), with each CA separated by 3–7 days. The five CA were: 1) FIFA11+ at level 1 (F1); 2) FIFA11+ at level 2 (F2); 3) FIFA11+ at level 3 (F3); 4) FIFA11+ at reduced version (FR); and 5) Standard warm-up of the players (Control). The subjective session rating of perceived exertion (session-RPE), countermovement jump (CMJ), 10-m sprint, and 505 agility test were measured 5 min after each CA. CMJ was higher in the FR (29.6 ± 5.5 cm) compared to the F1 (27.7 ± 4.6 cm) (<em>p</em>&lt;0.05). There was no difference between the other comparisons (F2: 28.2 ± 3.6 cm; F3: 28.1 ± 5.0 cm; Control: 28.6 ± 4.9 cm; <em>p</em>&gt;0.05). The sprint performance was higher in the Control (1.937±0.166 s) and FR (1.931±0.123 s) compared to the F1 (2.006±0.113 s) (<em>p</em>&lt;0.05). There was no difference between the other comparisons (F2: 1.970±0.116 s; F3: 1.999±0.117 s) (<em>p</em>&gt;0.05). Agility performance did not differ between conditions (FR: 2.756±0.205 s; F1: 2.7286±0.229 s; F2: 2.832±0.228 s; F3: 2.804±0.209 s; CON: 2.756±0.205 s; <em>p</em>&gt;0.05). Session-RPE was considered hard for all CA, with no significant differences among conditions (<em>p</em>&gt;0.05). The internal training load was higher in the F1, F2, and F3 compared to the FR and CON (<em>p</em>&lt;0.05). The current results suggest performing a standard warm-up or the reduced version of FIFA 11+ to optimize performance in the CMJ and sprint of U-15 soccer players.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100113,"journal":{"name":"Apunts Sports Medicine","volume":"58 219","pages":"Article 100419"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apunts Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666506923000184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study investigated the effects of different intensities of FIFA11+ on the physical performance of U-15 soccer players. Eighteen U-15 soccer players (13.3 ± 0.7 years) performed five randomized conditioning activities (CA), with each CA separated by 3–7 days. The five CA were: 1) FIFA11+ at level 1 (F1); 2) FIFA11+ at level 2 (F2); 3) FIFA11+ at level 3 (F3); 4) FIFA11+ at reduced version (FR); and 5) Standard warm-up of the players (Control). The subjective session rating of perceived exertion (session-RPE), countermovement jump (CMJ), 10-m sprint, and 505 agility test were measured 5 min after each CA. CMJ was higher in the FR (29.6 ± 5.5 cm) compared to the F1 (27.7 ± 4.6 cm) (p<0.05). There was no difference between the other comparisons (F2: 28.2 ± 3.6 cm; F3: 28.1 ± 5.0 cm; Control: 28.6 ± 4.9 cm; p>0.05). The sprint performance was higher in the Control (1.937±0.166 s) and FR (1.931±0.123 s) compared to the F1 (2.006±0.113 s) (p<0.05). There was no difference between the other comparisons (F2: 1.970±0.116 s; F3: 1.999±0.117 s) (p>0.05). Agility performance did not differ between conditions (FR: 2.756±0.205 s; F1: 2.7286±0.229 s; F2: 2.832±0.228 s; F3: 2.804±0.209 s; CON: 2.756±0.205 s; p>0.05). Session-RPE was considered hard for all CA, with no significant differences among conditions (p>0.05). The internal training load was higher in the F1, F2, and F3 compared to the FR and CON (p<0.05). The current results suggest performing a standard warm-up or the reduced version of FIFA 11+ to optimize performance in the CMJ and sprint of U-15 soccer players.

不同强度fifa11 +对U-15足球运动员体能表现的影响
本研究探讨了不同强度FIFA11+对U-15足球运动员体能的影响。18名U-15足球运动员(13.3 ± 0.7年)进行了五项随机条件调节活动(CA),每个CA间隔3-7天。5个CA为:1)FIFA11+处于1级(F1);2) FIFA11+处于2级(F2);3) FIFA11+三级(F3);4) FIFA11+精简版(FR);和5)球员的标准热身(对照)。测量了感知用力(会话RPE)、反动作跳跃(CMJ)、10米短跑和505敏捷性测试的主观会话评分 每次CA后分钟。FR中的CMJ较高(29.6 ± 5.5 厘米)相比F1(27.7 ± 4.6 cm)(p<0.05)。其他比较之间没有差异(F2:28.2 ± 3.6 厘米F3:28.1 ± 5 厘米对照:28.6 ± 4.9 厘米p>;0.05)。对照组的短跑成绩较高(1.937±0.166 s) FR(1.931±0.123 s) 与F1相比(2.006±0.113 s) (p<0.05)。其他比较之间没有差异(F2:1.970±0.116 sF3:1.999±0.117 s) (p>0.05)。不同条件下的敏捷性表现没有差异(FR:2.756±0.205 sF1:2.7286±0.229 sF2:2.832±0.228 sF3:2.804±0.209 sCON:2.756±0.205 sp>;0.05)。训练RPE被认为对所有CA来说都很难,条件之间没有显著差异(p>0.05)。与FR和CON相比,F1、F2和F3的内部训练负荷更高(p<0.05)。目前的结果建议进行标准热身或FIFA 11+的精简版,以优化U-15足球运动员在CMJ和短跑中的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信