What can we learn from the past? Tracking sustainability indicators for the Swedish dairy sector over 30 years

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Johan O. Karlsson , Helena Robling , Christel Cederberg , Rolf Spörndly , Mikaela Lindberg , Carin Martiin , Elsa Ardfors , Pernilla Tidåker
{"title":"What can we learn from the past? Tracking sustainability indicators for the Swedish dairy sector over 30 years","authors":"Johan O. Karlsson ,&nbsp;Helena Robling ,&nbsp;Christel Cederberg ,&nbsp;Rolf Spörndly ,&nbsp;Mikaela Lindberg ,&nbsp;Carin Martiin ,&nbsp;Elsa Ardfors ,&nbsp;Pernilla Tidåker","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2023.103779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><p>The dairy sector has undergone profound transformation over recent decades, resulting in considerably fewer but larger and more specialised farms, with unclear implications across sustainability dimensions.</p></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><p>The objective was to develop and employ a framework for assessing sustainability in the Swedish dairy sector to shed light on how recent historical developments (1990–2020) have influenced sustainability outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>Using a data-driven, multidisciplinary approach, main areas of concern for sustainability in the primary production stages of the dairy sector were identified. These were then populated with indicators to track developments over time and highlight synergies and trade-offs.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS</h3><p>Four areas of concern were identified and populated with eight indicators (listed in brackets): ‘supporting ecosystems’ (semi-natural grassland area, ley area, mean field size), ‘climate impact’ (methane from enteric fermentation), ‘animal welfare’ (veterinary treatments, percentage of culled cows due to diseases) and ‘farm viability’ (competitive wages, farmer age structure). The results showed that area of semi-natural grassland per dairy cow decreased by 27% from 2003 to 2020. Area of ley per cow decreased slightly but the proportion of arable land on dairy farms devoted to ley cultivation increased, due to improved roughage quality enabling an increase in proportion of roughage in feed rations. In terms of climate impact, enteric methane emissions per kg milk decreased by 21%. Regarding animal welfare, veterinary treatments of diseases decreased from 45% to 21% over the 30 years, with declining trends for most recorded diseases except hoof disease. The indicators for farm viability showed that the average dairy farm was unable to pay a wage comparable to the national average throughout most of the period 2004–2020, but a slightly positive trend was observed, although with large year-on-year variability. A rapid change in age structure was seen between 2003 and 2020, with the proportion of land managed by older farmers (+60 years) increasing from 12% to 22%, indicating challenges with demographic viability.</p></div><div><h3>SIGNIFICANCE</h3><p>Tracking changes over time across sustainability dimensions gives important insights into improvements made and challenges that remain to be solved. Overall, developments in the Swedish dairy sector have diminished its capacity to support ecosystems, particularly related to semi-natural grasslands, while reducing its climate impacts and improving animal welfare. An increased specialisation has also resulted in spillover effects where services and impacts have shifted from dairy herds to specialised beef herds. These findings are important in navigating policy processes targeting developments in the dairy sector.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"212 ","pages":"Article 103779"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X23001841","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CONTEXT

The dairy sector has undergone profound transformation over recent decades, resulting in considerably fewer but larger and more specialised farms, with unclear implications across sustainability dimensions.

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to develop and employ a framework for assessing sustainability in the Swedish dairy sector to shed light on how recent historical developments (1990–2020) have influenced sustainability outcomes.

METHODS

Using a data-driven, multidisciplinary approach, main areas of concern for sustainability in the primary production stages of the dairy sector were identified. These were then populated with indicators to track developments over time and highlight synergies and trade-offs.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Four areas of concern were identified and populated with eight indicators (listed in brackets): ‘supporting ecosystems’ (semi-natural grassland area, ley area, mean field size), ‘climate impact’ (methane from enteric fermentation), ‘animal welfare’ (veterinary treatments, percentage of culled cows due to diseases) and ‘farm viability’ (competitive wages, farmer age structure). The results showed that area of semi-natural grassland per dairy cow decreased by 27% from 2003 to 2020. Area of ley per cow decreased slightly but the proportion of arable land on dairy farms devoted to ley cultivation increased, due to improved roughage quality enabling an increase in proportion of roughage in feed rations. In terms of climate impact, enteric methane emissions per kg milk decreased by 21%. Regarding animal welfare, veterinary treatments of diseases decreased from 45% to 21% over the 30 years, with declining trends for most recorded diseases except hoof disease. The indicators for farm viability showed that the average dairy farm was unable to pay a wage comparable to the national average throughout most of the period 2004–2020, but a slightly positive trend was observed, although with large year-on-year variability. A rapid change in age structure was seen between 2003 and 2020, with the proportion of land managed by older farmers (+60 years) increasing from 12% to 22%, indicating challenges with demographic viability.

SIGNIFICANCE

Tracking changes over time across sustainability dimensions gives important insights into improvements made and challenges that remain to be solved. Overall, developments in the Swedish dairy sector have diminished its capacity to support ecosystems, particularly related to semi-natural grasslands, while reducing its climate impacts and improving animal welfare. An increased specialisation has also resulted in spillover effects where services and impacts have shifted from dairy herds to specialised beef herds. These findings are important in navigating policy processes targeting developments in the dairy sector.

Abstract Image

我们能从过去学到什么?跟踪瑞典乳制品行业30年来的可持续发展指标
近几十年来,乳制品行业经历了深刻的变革,导致农场数量大幅减少,但规模更大,专业化程度更高,对可持续发展的影响尚不明确。目标目标是制定和使用一个评估瑞典乳制品行业可持续性的框架,以阐明最近的历史发展(1990-2020)如何影响可持续性结果。方法采用数据驱动的多学科方法,确定了乳制品行业初级生产阶段可持续性的主要关注领域。然后用指标来填充这些指标,以跟踪一段时间内的发展,并强调协同作用和权衡。结果和结论确定了我们关注的领域,并用八个指标(括号中列出)填充:“支持生态系统”(半天然草地面积、ley面积、平均田地面积)、“气候影响”(肠道发酵产生的甲烷),“动物福利”(兽医治疗、因疾病而扑杀奶牛的百分比)和“农场生存能力”(有竞争力的工资、农民年龄结构)。结果显示,2003年至2020年,每头奶牛的半天然草地面积减少了27%。每头牛的ley面积略有下降,但奶牛场用于ley种植的耕地比例有所增加,这是因为粗饲料质量的提高使粗饲料在口粮中的比例增加。就气候影响而言,每公斤牛奶的肠道甲烷排放量减少了21%。关于动物福利,30年来,兽医对疾病的治疗从45%下降到21%,除蹄病外,大多数记录在案的疾病都呈下降趋势。农场生存能力指标显示,在2004年至2020年的大部分时间里,平均奶牛场无法支付与全国平均水平相当的工资,但观察到了一个略为积极的趋势,尽管同比变化很大。2003年至2020年间,年龄结构发生了快速变化,老年农民(60岁以上)管理的土地比例从12%增加到22%,这表明人口生存能力面临挑战。显著性跟踪可持续性维度随时间的变化,可以对所做的改进和有待解决的挑战提供重要见解。总体而言,瑞典乳制品行业的发展削弱了其支持生态系统的能力,特别是与半天然草原有关的生态系统,同时减少了其对气候的影响,改善了动物福利。专业化程度的提高也导致了溢出效应,服务和影响从奶牛群转移到了专业化的牛肉群。这些发现对于引导针对乳制品行业发展的政策进程具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural Systems
Agricultural Systems 农林科学-农业综合
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
7.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments. The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas: Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making; The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment; Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems; Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信