Are there good days and bad days for hearing? Quantifying day-to-day intraindividual speech perception variability in older and younger adults.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Inka Kuhlmann, Giulia Angonese, Christiane Thiel, Birger Kollmeier, Andrea Hildebrandt
{"title":"Are there good days and bad days for hearing? Quantifying day-to-day intraindividual speech perception variability in older and younger adults.","authors":"Inka Kuhlmann,&nbsp;Giulia Angonese,&nbsp;Christiane Thiel,&nbsp;Birger Kollmeier,&nbsp;Andrea Hildebrandt","doi":"10.1037/xhp0001159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Moment-to-moment variations in hearing and speech perception have long been observed. Depending on the researcher's theoretical position, the observed fluctuations have been attributed to measurement error or to internal, nonsensory factors such as fluctuations in attention. While cognitive performance has been shown to fluctuate from day to day over longer time, such fluctuations have not been quantified for speech perception, despite being well-recognized by clinical audiologists and hearing-impaired patients. In three studies, we aimed to explore and quantify the magnitude of daily variability in speech perception and to investigate whether such variability goes beyond test unreliability. We also asked whether intraindividual variability depends on overall speech perception performance as observed in different groups of individuals. Older adults with objective hearing impairment and mostly hearing aids (N₁ = 45), with subjective hearing problems but no hearing aids (N₂ = 113), and younger adults without hearing problems (N₃ = 20) participated in three ecological momentary assessment studies. They performed a digit-in-noise test two to three times a day for several weeks. Variance heterogeneous linear mixed-effects models indicated reliable intraindividual variability in speech perception and substantial individual differences in daily variability. A protective factor against daily fluctuations is a higher average speech perception. These studies show that day-to-day variations in speech perception cannot simply be attributed to test unreliability and pave the way for investigating how psychological states that do not vary from moment-to-moment, but rather from day to day, predict variations in speech perception. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Moment-to-moment variations in hearing and speech perception have long been observed. Depending on the researcher's theoretical position, the observed fluctuations have been attributed to measurement error or to internal, nonsensory factors such as fluctuations in attention. While cognitive performance has been shown to fluctuate from day to day over longer time, such fluctuations have not been quantified for speech perception, despite being well-recognized by clinical audiologists and hearing-impaired patients. In three studies, we aimed to explore and quantify the magnitude of daily variability in speech perception and to investigate whether such variability goes beyond test unreliability. We also asked whether intraindividual variability depends on overall speech perception performance as observed in different groups of individuals. Older adults with objective hearing impairment and mostly hearing aids (N₁ = 45), with subjective hearing problems but no hearing aids (N₂ = 113), and younger adults without hearing problems (N₃ = 20) participated in three ecological momentary assessment studies. They performed a digit-in-noise test two to three times a day for several weeks. Variance heterogeneous linear mixed-effects models indicated reliable intraindividual variability in speech perception and substantial individual differences in daily variability. A protective factor against daily fluctuations is a higher average speech perception. These studies show that day-to-day variations in speech perception cannot simply be attributed to test unreliability and pave the way for investigating how psychological states that do not vary from moment-to-moment, but rather from day to day, predict variations in speech perception. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

听力有好日子和坏日子吗?量化老年人和年轻人日常个体内言语感知的可变性。
长期以来,人们一直观察到听觉和言语感知的瞬间变化。根据研究人员的理论立场,观察到的波动被归因于测量误差或内部的非感官因素,如注意力的波动。虽然认知表现已被证明在更长的时间内每天都在波动,但尽管临床听力学家和听障患者已经很好地认识到了这种波动,但这种波动还没有被量化用于言语感知。在三项研究中,我们旨在探索和量化语音感知中日常变化的幅度,并调查这种变化是否超出了测试的不可靠性。我们还询问了个体内的变异性是否取决于在不同个体组中观察到的整体言语感知表现。患有客观听力障碍且主要是助听器的老年人(N₁ = 45),有主观听力问题,但没有助听器(N₂ = 113),以及没有听力问题的年轻人(N₃ = 20) 参与了三项生态瞬时评估研究。他们连续几周每天进行两到三次数字噪声测试。方差异质线性混合效应模型表明,言语感知的个体内变异性可靠,日常变异性的个体差异显著。抵御日常波动的一个保护因素是较高的平均语音感知。这些研究表明,言语感知的日常变化不能简单地归因于测试的不可靠性,并为研究心理状态如何预测言语感知的变化铺平了道路。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023 APA,保留所有权利)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信