Prosthetic device and service satisfaction, quality of life, and functional performance in lower limb prosthesis clients.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Oluwagbemiga O DadeMatthews, Jaimie A Roper, Adan Vazquez, David M Shannon, JoEllen M Sefton
{"title":"Prosthetic device and service satisfaction, quality of life, and functional performance in lower limb prosthesis clients.","authors":"Oluwagbemiga O DadeMatthews, Jaimie A Roper, Adan Vazquez, David M Shannon, JoEllen M Sefton","doi":"10.1097/PXR.0000000000000285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to characterize the relationship between prosthetic device and service satisfaction, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and functional movement in a diverse population of lower limb prosthesis users.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online survey was conducted on individuals with lower limb amputation between September and October 2021. Sample validated questionnaires assessing demographic and clinical features, satisfaction, functional outcomes, and quality of life were analyzed using path analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were 1736 individuals with lower limb amputation. Overall, 44% of participants reported dissatisfaction with prosthetic device, whereas 37% were dissatisfied with prosthetic service. Low functional mobility was reported by 58% of participants and 61% reported low HRQOL. Lower extremity functional status (β = 0.55), HRQOL (β = 0.08), Activities-specific Balance Scale (β = 0.22), and modified fall efficacy scale (β = -0.07) are significantly associated with prosthetic device satisfaction ( P < 0.0005, R 2 = 0.47). Satisfaction with provider service was significantly associated with lower extremity functional status (β = 0.44) and balance confidence (β = 0.18) ( P < 0.0005, R 2 = 0.34).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and clinical relevance: </strong>Civilians, veterans, and service members reported low functional mobility, low quality of life, and moderate levels of dissatisfaction with their lower extremity prosthetic device and provider service. Improvements in mobility, balance, quality of life, and fall efficacy may enhance device satisfaction. Functional mobility and balance improvements may increase ratings of provider service. This study provides feedback that may improve clinical decisions on lower limb prosthesis patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":49657,"journal":{"name":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11323760/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prosthetics and Orthotics International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PXR.0000000000000285","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to characterize the relationship between prosthetic device and service satisfaction, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and functional movement in a diverse population of lower limb prosthesis users.

Methods: An online survey was conducted on individuals with lower limb amputation between September and October 2021. Sample validated questionnaires assessing demographic and clinical features, satisfaction, functional outcomes, and quality of life were analyzed using path analysis.

Results: Participants were 1736 individuals with lower limb amputation. Overall, 44% of participants reported dissatisfaction with prosthetic device, whereas 37% were dissatisfied with prosthetic service. Low functional mobility was reported by 58% of participants and 61% reported low HRQOL. Lower extremity functional status (β = 0.55), HRQOL (β = 0.08), Activities-specific Balance Scale (β = 0.22), and modified fall efficacy scale (β = -0.07) are significantly associated with prosthetic device satisfaction ( P < 0.0005, R 2 = 0.47). Satisfaction with provider service was significantly associated with lower extremity functional status (β = 0.44) and balance confidence (β = 0.18) ( P < 0.0005, R 2 = 0.34).

Conclusion and clinical relevance: Civilians, veterans, and service members reported low functional mobility, low quality of life, and moderate levels of dissatisfaction with their lower extremity prosthetic device and provider service. Improvements in mobility, balance, quality of life, and fall efficacy may enhance device satisfaction. Functional mobility and balance improvements may increase ratings of provider service. This study provides feedback that may improve clinical decisions on lower limb prosthesis patient care.

假肢装置和服务满意度、生活质量以及下肢假肢客户的功能表现。
目的:本研究的目的是在不同的下肢假肢使用者群体中,表征假肢装置与服务满意度、健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)和功能运动之间的关系。方法:在2021年9月至10月期间,对下肢截肢患者进行了在线调查。使用路径分析对样本验证问卷进行分析,评估人口统计学和临床特征、满意度、功能结果和生活质量。结果:参与者为1736名下肢截肢患者。总体而言,44%的参与者表示对假肢装置不满意,而37%的参与者对假肢服务不满意。58%的参与者报告功能活动能力低下,61%的参与者报告HRQOL低下。下肢功能状态(β=0.55),HRQOL(β=0.08),活动特异性平衡量表(β=0.22),和改良秋季疗效量表(β=-0.07)与假肢装置满意度显著相关(P<0.0005,R2=0.47)。对提供者服务的满意度与下肢功能状态(β=0.44)和平衡置信度(β=0.18)显著相关(P=0.0005,R2=0.34),服务人员报告称,他们的功能活动能力低下,生活质量低下,对他们的下肢假肢装置和提供者服务有中度不满。移动性、平衡性、生活质量和跌倒疗效的改善可能会提高设备的满意度。功能移动性和平衡性的改进可以提高提供商服务的评级。这项研究提供的反馈可能会改善下肢假体患者护理的临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
208
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prosthetics and Orthotics International is an international, multidisciplinary journal for all professionals who have an interest in the medical, clinical, rehabilitation, technical, educational and research aspects of prosthetics, orthotics and rehabilitation engineering, as well as their related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信