Attachment style and attention bias to emotional information: The moderating effect of stress, stimulus characteristics, and attention stage

IF 5 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology
Xinyuan Peng, Omri Gillath, Mengjie Jiang, Beiyi Wang, Jianxin Zhang, Lili Wu
{"title":"Attachment style and attention bias to emotional information: The moderating effect of stress, stimulus characteristics, and attention stage","authors":"Xinyuan Peng,&nbsp;Omri Gillath,&nbsp;Mengjie Jiang,&nbsp;Beiyi Wang,&nbsp;Jianxin Zhang,&nbsp;Lili Wu","doi":"10.1111/jopy.12891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>We examined whether insecurely attached individuals exhibit an attention bias to emotional information, and further tested the potential moderating role of stress, information valence, information attachment relevance, and attention stage.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Attachment style can predict people's attention to emotional information. However, the empirical findings are inconsistent, making it difficult to determine the associations between attachment style and attention bias to emotional information.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>We included 68 studies (<i>N</i> = 5417) across 46 published and unpublished articles (the initial pool was 627 articles) in the meta-analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>People high on attachment avoidance exhibited decreased attention toward emotional stimuli (<i>d</i> = −0.129, <i>p</i> = 0.020), which was not affected by stress, information valence, information attachment relevance, or attention stage. Conversely, people high on attachment anxiety exhibited increased attention toward emotional stimuli, especially under stress, if the information was attachment-related, and during late-stage attentional processing. They exhibited an early bias away from and a late bias toward emotional information, which was intensified under stress.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Our findings support the proposition that people high on attachment avoidance use deactivating strategies in attentional processing; whereas people high on attachment anxiety use hyperactivating strategies, especially when resources are limited (under stress). When resources are available, and it is relatively early in the process, people high on attachment anxiety respond similarly to those high on attachment avoidance.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jopy.12891","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

We examined whether insecurely attached individuals exhibit an attention bias to emotional information, and further tested the potential moderating role of stress, information valence, information attachment relevance, and attention stage.

Background

Attachment style can predict people's attention to emotional information. However, the empirical findings are inconsistent, making it difficult to determine the associations between attachment style and attention bias to emotional information.

Method

We included 68 studies (N = 5417) across 46 published and unpublished articles (the initial pool was 627 articles) in the meta-analysis.

Results

People high on attachment avoidance exhibited decreased attention toward emotional stimuli (d = −0.129, p = 0.020), which was not affected by stress, information valence, information attachment relevance, or attention stage. Conversely, people high on attachment anxiety exhibited increased attention toward emotional stimuli, especially under stress, if the information was attachment-related, and during late-stage attentional processing. They exhibited an early bias away from and a late bias toward emotional information, which was intensified under stress.

Conclusion

Our findings support the proposition that people high on attachment avoidance use deactivating strategies in attentional processing; whereas people high on attachment anxiety use hyperactivating strategies, especially when resources are limited (under stress). When resources are available, and it is relatively early in the process, people high on attachment anxiety respond similarly to those high on attachment avoidance.

依恋风格和对情绪信息的注意偏向:压力、刺激特征和注意阶段的调节作用。
目的:我们研究了不安全依恋个体是否对情绪信息表现出注意偏见,并进一步测试了压力、信息效价、信息依恋相关性和注意力阶段的潜在调节作用。背景:依恋风格可以预测人们对情感信息的关注程度。然而,实证结果并不一致,这使得很难确定依恋风格和对情绪信息的注意力偏见之间的联系。方法:我们纳入了68项研究(N = 5417篇),在荟萃分析中的46篇已发表和未发表的文章中(最初的文献库为627篇)。结果:高度回避依恋的人对情绪刺激的关注度降低(d = -0.129, p = 0.020),不受压力、信息效价、信息依恋相关性或注意力阶段的影响。相反,高度依恋焦虑的人对情绪刺激表现出更强的注意力,尤其是在压力下,如果信息与依恋有关,以及在后期注意力处理过程中。他们表现出对情绪信息的早期偏见和后期偏见,这种偏见在压力下会加剧。结论:我们的研究结果支持这样一个命题,即高度依恋回避的人在注意处理中使用去激活策略;而高度依恋焦虑的人则使用过度激活策略,尤其是在资源有限的情况下(在压力下)。当资源可用时,而且这一过程相对较早,依恋焦虑程度高的人的反应与依恋回避程度高的人群相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Personality
Journal of Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
6.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: Journal of Personality publishes scientific investigations in the field of personality. It focuses particularly on personality and behavior dynamics, personality development, and individual differences in the cognitive, affective, and interpersonal domains. The journal reflects and stimulates interest in the growth of new theoretical and methodological approaches in personality psychology.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信