Comparative Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation Therapy for Essential Tremor: A Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial.

IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements Pub Date : 2023-10-16 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.5334/tohm.798
Dingwei Dai, Joaquim Fernandes, Han Kim, Henriette Coetzer
{"title":"Comparative Effectiveness of Transcutaneous Afferent Patterned Stimulation Therapy for Essential Tremor: A Randomized Pragmatic Clinical Trial.","authors":"Dingwei Dai, Joaquim Fernandes, Han Kim, Henriette Coetzer","doi":"10.5334/tohm.798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcutaneous afferent patterned stimulation (TAPS) is a wrist-worn, non-invasive therapy delivering calibrated stimulation to the median and radial nerves. Previous randomized controlled studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of TAPS therapy in some patients with essential tremor (ET), but evidence supporting therapeutic benefits of TAPS versus standard of care (SOC) is lacking. This randomized prospective study evaluated the clinical benefit of adding TAPS treatment to SOC versus SOC alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized pragmatic trial recruited patients from a large health plan's Commercially Insured and Medicare Advantage population. All 310 patients received a TAPS device and were randomized 1:1 to either one month adding TAPS therapy to usual care (TX arm) or usual care with tremor assessment only (SOC arm). The pre-specified endpoints were changes in tremor power measured by motion sensors on the device (primary) and improvement in Bain & Findley Activities of Daily Living (BF-ADL) upper limb scores (secondary) between TX and SOC in all patients who completed the one-month study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>276 patients completed the one-month study (N = 133 TX, N = 143 SOC). The study met the primary and secondary endpoints, with significantly reduced tremor power in TX compared with SOC (0.017 (0.003) versus 0.08 (0.014) (m/s<sup>2</sup>)<sup>2</sup>; geometric mean (SE); <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and greater improvement in the BF-ADL score in TX than SOC (1.6 (0.43) vs 0.2 (0.37) points; mean (SE); <i>p</i> < 0.05). No serious device-related adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This trial demonstrates that adding TAPS treatment to SOC significantly improves tremor power and BF-ADLs in patients with ET compared to SOC alone over one month of home use.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>This study found that adding TAPS treatment to SOC significantly improves tremor power and BF-ADL scores in patients with ET compared to SOC alone over one month of home use. This real-world evidence study suggests that non-invasive TAPS therapy is a safe and valuable treatment option for patients with ET.</p>","PeriodicalId":23317,"journal":{"name":"Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588491/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/tohm.798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transcutaneous afferent patterned stimulation (TAPS) is a wrist-worn, non-invasive therapy delivering calibrated stimulation to the median and radial nerves. Previous randomized controlled studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of TAPS therapy in some patients with essential tremor (ET), but evidence supporting therapeutic benefits of TAPS versus standard of care (SOC) is lacking. This randomized prospective study evaluated the clinical benefit of adding TAPS treatment to SOC versus SOC alone.

Methods: This randomized pragmatic trial recruited patients from a large health plan's Commercially Insured and Medicare Advantage population. All 310 patients received a TAPS device and were randomized 1:1 to either one month adding TAPS therapy to usual care (TX arm) or usual care with tremor assessment only (SOC arm). The pre-specified endpoints were changes in tremor power measured by motion sensors on the device (primary) and improvement in Bain & Findley Activities of Daily Living (BF-ADL) upper limb scores (secondary) between TX and SOC in all patients who completed the one-month study.

Results: 276 patients completed the one-month study (N = 133 TX, N = 143 SOC). The study met the primary and secondary endpoints, with significantly reduced tremor power in TX compared with SOC (0.017 (0.003) versus 0.08 (0.014) (m/s2)2; geometric mean (SE); p < 0.0001) and greater improvement in the BF-ADL score in TX than SOC (1.6 (0.43) vs 0.2 (0.37) points; mean (SE); p < 0.05). No serious device-related adverse events were reported.

Discussion: This trial demonstrates that adding TAPS treatment to SOC significantly improves tremor power and BF-ADLs in patients with ET compared to SOC alone over one month of home use.

Highlights: This study found that adding TAPS treatment to SOC significantly improves tremor power and BF-ADL scores in patients with ET compared to SOC alone over one month of home use. This real-world evidence study suggests that non-invasive TAPS therapy is a safe and valuable treatment option for patients with ET.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

经皮传入模式刺激治疗原发性震颤的疗效比较:一项随机实用的临床试验。
背景:经皮传入模式刺激(TAPS)是一种戴在手腕上的非侵入性疗法,为正中神经和桡神经提供校准刺激。先前的随机对照研究已经证明了TAPS治疗某些原发性震颤(ET)患者的有效性和安全性,但缺乏证据支持TAPS相对于标准护理(SOC)的治疗益处。这项随机前瞻性研究评估了在SOC中加入TAPS治疗与单独使用SOC相比的临床益处。方法:这项随机实用试验从大型健康计划的商业保险和医疗保险优势人群中招募患者。所有310名患者都接受了TAPS装置,并以1:1的比例随机分为一个月,在常规护理中增加TAPS治疗(TX组)或仅进行震颤评估的常规护理(SOC组)。预先指定的终点是通过设备上的运动传感器测量的震颤功率的变化(主要),以及所有完成一个月研究的患者在TX和SOC之间Bain&Findley日常生活活动(BF-ADL)上肢评分的改善(次要)。结果:276名患者完成了为期一个月的研究(N=133 TX,N=143 SOC)。该研究满足了主要和次要终点,与SOC相比,TX的震颤功率显著降低(0.017(0.003)对0.08(0.014)(m/s2)2;几何平均数;p<0.0001),并且TX中BF-ADL评分的改善大于SOC(1.6(0.43)vs 0.2(0.37)分;平均值(SE);p<0.05)。未报告严重的器械相关不良事件。讨论:该试验表明,在家庭使用一个月后,与单独使用SOC相比,在SOC中添加TAPS治疗可显著改善ET患者的震颤能力和BF ADL。亮点:这项研究发现,在家庭使用一个月的时间里,与单独使用SOC相比,在SOC中添加TAPS治疗可显著提高ET患者的震颤能力和BF-ADL评分。这项真实世界的证据研究表明,非侵入性TAPS治疗对ET患者来说是一种安全而有价值的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
31
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信