Does Case-Finding for Admission to Aged Care Rapid Investigation and Assessment Unit for Older Patients Improve Hospital Length of Stay? Evaluation of ARIA Unit.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
International Journal of Integrated Care Pub Date : 2023-10-16 eCollection Date: 2023-10-01 DOI:10.5334/ijic.7038
Sundhar R Balu, Angela Khoo, Carol Lu Hunter, Danielle Ní Chróinín
{"title":"Does Case-Finding for Admission to Aged Care Rapid Investigation and Assessment Unit for Older Patients Improve Hospital Length of Stay? <i>Evaluation of ARIA Unit</i>.","authors":"Sundhar R Balu,&nbsp;Angela Khoo,&nbsp;Carol Lu Hunter,&nbsp;Danielle Ní Chróinín","doi":"10.5334/ijic.7038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Many older people present to emergency departments annually, often with complex geriatric syndromes, yet current acute care models and traditional admissions process may under-serve their needs. The multidisciplinary Aged Care Rapid Investigation and Assessment (ARIA) Unit seeks to bridge this gap, by actively identifying and assessing patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective case-control study was undertaken at a single-centre tertiary referral institution. Patients were eligible for inclusion in ARIA group if admitted to ARIA via case-finding by the geriatrician or Aged Care Services Emergency Team, whilst standard geriatric admissions formed the control group. This study evaluates whether ARIA reduced hospital length-of-stay (LOS) and representation rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>370 patients were included (185 each arm) with similar baseline demographics, frailty scores, and Charlson Comorbidity Indices. Patients admitted to ARIA had significantly shorter hospital LOS than those via standard pathway (3.3 days [IQR2.2-5.8] vs 7.5 days [IQR4.2-13.7], p < 0.00001). There were no significant differences in 90-day representation rates (n = 66 [35.7%] vs n = 64 [34.6%], p = 0.82).</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusion: </strong>Introduction of an ARIA unit with a targeted approach to frontline geriatric services and case-finding is associated with improved LOS of older acute hospital patients. An economical cost analysis of this study would be beneficial in exploring potential financial savings.</p>","PeriodicalId":14049,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Integrated Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588540/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Integrated Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.7038","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Many older people present to emergency departments annually, often with complex geriatric syndromes, yet current acute care models and traditional admissions process may under-serve their needs. The multidisciplinary Aged Care Rapid Investigation and Assessment (ARIA) Unit seeks to bridge this gap, by actively identifying and assessing patients.

Methods: A prospective case-control study was undertaken at a single-centre tertiary referral institution. Patients were eligible for inclusion in ARIA group if admitted to ARIA via case-finding by the geriatrician or Aged Care Services Emergency Team, whilst standard geriatric admissions formed the control group. This study evaluates whether ARIA reduced hospital length-of-stay (LOS) and representation rates.

Results: 370 patients were included (185 each arm) with similar baseline demographics, frailty scores, and Charlson Comorbidity Indices. Patients admitted to ARIA had significantly shorter hospital LOS than those via standard pathway (3.3 days [IQR2.2-5.8] vs 7.5 days [IQR4.2-13.7], p < 0.00001). There were no significant differences in 90-day representation rates (n = 66 [35.7%] vs n = 64 [34.6%], p = 0.82).

Discussion/conclusion: Introduction of an ARIA unit with a targeted approach to frontline geriatric services and case-finding is associated with improved LOS of older acute hospital patients. An economical cost analysis of this study would be beneficial in exploring potential financial savings.

Abstract Image

老年患者入住老年护理快速调查和评估单元的病例发现是否会延长住院时间?ARIA单元评估。
引言:许多老年人每年都会去急诊室就诊,通常患有复杂的老年综合征,但目前的急性护理模式和传统的入院流程可能无法满足他们的需求。多学科老年护理快速调查和评估(ARIA)部门试图通过积极识别和评估患者来弥补这一差距。方法:在单中心三级转诊机构进行前瞻性病例对照研究。如果患者通过老年病学家或老年护理服务应急小组的病例发现进入ARIA,则有资格纳入ARIA组,而标准老年病入院构成对照组。本研究评估ARIA是否降低了住院时间(LOS)和代表率。结果:370名患者(每组185人)具有相似的基线人口统计学、虚弱评分和Charlson共病指数。与通过标准途径入院的患者相比,ARIA患者的住院时间明显更短(3.3天[IQR2.2-5.8]与7.5天[IQR4.2-13.7],p<0.00001)。90天的代表率没有显著差异(n=66[35.7%]与n=64[34.6%],p=0.82)病例发现与老年急性住院患者的LOS改善有关。本研究的经济成本分析将有助于探索潜在的财务节约。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Integrated Care
International Journal of Integrated Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
887
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 2000, IJIC’s mission is to promote integrated care as a scientific discipline. IJIC’s primary purpose is to examine critically the policy and practice of integrated care and whether and how this has impacted on quality-of-care, user experiences, and cost-effectiveness. The journal regularly publishes conference supplements and special themed editions. To find out more contact Managing Editor, Susan Royer. The Journal is supported by the International Foundation for Integrated Care (IFIC).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信