[Berthold Kihn (1895-1964) and the NS "Euthanasia": Profile of a Perpetrator].

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Birgit Braun, Nikolaus Knoepffler
{"title":"[Berthold Kihn (1895-1964) and the NS \"Euthanasia\": Profile of a Perpetrator].","authors":"Birgit Braun,&nbsp;Nikolaus Knoepffler","doi":"10.1055/a-2066-0207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In historical sciences, there is no consensus on how to understand the transition from eugenic sterilization to \"euthanasia\". The aim of this article was to investigate this question based on the historical-critical method, using the example of the perpetrator profile of Berthold Kihn. His pseudoscientific way to \"euthanasia\", however, did not have an eugenic foundation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Literature- and archival studies were carried out. For the first time, attention was paid to relevant Franconian and familial archival sources. Moreover, documents of the Jena University Archive were compared to those of the concentration camps of Buchenwald and Oranienburg.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After professional as well as private dilemma, the neuroinfectiologist Kihn set a focus on the \"eradication of the inferiors\". Apart from Kihn's role in central \"euthanasia\" and \"childrens' euthanasia\", which has been clearly demonstrated, we found actual hints of his additional involvement in decentral \"euthanasia\". This is shown using the example of the prominent patient Felix von Papen.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Kihn was no racial hygienist, he did not make his mark as an eugenicist. His professional and private dilemma may - among other things - have motivated him, to join a politically promoted movement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further comparative research in the profiling of NS perpetrators may contribute to a better differentiation of the transition from eugenics to \"euthanasia\".</p>","PeriodicalId":12353,"journal":{"name":"Fortschritte Der Neurologie Psychiatrie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fortschritte Der Neurologie Psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2066-0207","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In historical sciences, there is no consensus on how to understand the transition from eugenic sterilization to "euthanasia". The aim of this article was to investigate this question based on the historical-critical method, using the example of the perpetrator profile of Berthold Kihn. His pseudoscientific way to "euthanasia", however, did not have an eugenic foundation.

Methods: Literature- and archival studies were carried out. For the first time, attention was paid to relevant Franconian and familial archival sources. Moreover, documents of the Jena University Archive were compared to those of the concentration camps of Buchenwald and Oranienburg.

Results: After professional as well as private dilemma, the neuroinfectiologist Kihn set a focus on the "eradication of the inferiors". Apart from Kihn's role in central "euthanasia" and "childrens' euthanasia", which has been clearly demonstrated, we found actual hints of his additional involvement in decentral "euthanasia". This is shown using the example of the prominent patient Felix von Papen.

Discussion: Kihn was no racial hygienist, he did not make his mark as an eugenicist. His professional and private dilemma may - among other things - have motivated him, to join a politically promoted movement.

Conclusion: Further comparative research in the profiling of NS perpetrators may contribute to a better differentiation of the transition from eugenics to "euthanasia".

[Berthold Kihn(1895-1964)和NS“安乐死”:罪犯简介]。
引言:在历史科学中,如何理解从优生学绝育到“安乐死”的转变还没有达成共识。本文的目的是基于历史批判的方法,以Berthold Kihn的犯罪者档案为例,对这一问题进行研究。然而,他“安乐死”的伪科学方法并没有优生学的基础。方法:文献和档案研究。人们第一次注意到相关的弗兰科和家族档案来源。此外,耶拿大学档案馆的文件与布痕瓦尔德和奥拉尼堡集中营的文件进行了比较。结果:在经历了专业和私人的困境后,神经传染病学家Kihn将重点放在了“根除劣势”上。除了Kihn在中心“安乐死”和“儿童安乐死”中的作用(这一点已经得到了明确的证明)之外,我们还发现了他额外参与非中心性“安乐死”的实际暗示。这是用著名患者费利克斯·冯·帕彭的例子来展示的。讨论:Kihn不是一个种族卫生学家,他也不是一个优生学家。他的职业和私人困境可能促使他加入一场政治推动的运动。结论:对NS实施者进行进一步的比较研究可能有助于更好地区分从优生学到“安乐死”的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
139
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Fundiertes Wissen für den Berufsalltag Relevante Originalarbeiten Informative Übersichten zu wichtigen Themen Fortbildungsteil mit Zertifizierung – 36 CME-Punkte pro Jahr Interessante Kasuistiken Referiert & kommentiert: Internationale Studien Aktuelles zu Begutachtung und Neurobiologie International gelistet und häufig zitiert
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信