Direct molecular analysis of Malassezia species from the clinical samples of patients with pityriasis versicolor.

Q3 Medicine
Esmaeil Eghtedarnejad, Somayeh Khajeh, Kamiar Zomorodian, Zeinab Ghasemi, Somayeh Yazdanpanah, Marjan Motamedi
{"title":"Direct molecular analysis of <i>Malassezia</i> species from the clinical samples of patients with pityriasis versicolor.","authors":"Esmaeil Eghtedarnejad,&nbsp;Somayeh Khajeh,&nbsp;Kamiar Zomorodian,&nbsp;Zeinab Ghasemi,&nbsp;Somayeh Yazdanpanah,&nbsp;Marjan Motamedi","doi":"10.18502/CMM.2023.345029.1398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Species identification of <i>Malassezia</i> using culture-dependent methods is time-consuming due to their fastidious growth requirements. This study aimed to evaluate a rapid and accurate molecular method in order to diagnose the pityriasis versicolor (PV) and identify <i>Malassezia</i> species from direct clinical samples.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Skin scraping or tape samples from patients with PV and healthy volunteers as the control group were collected. Diagnosis of PV was confirmed by direct microscopic examination. The DNA extraction was performed according to the steel-bullet beating method. Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism assay using <i>Hha</i>I restriction enzyme was applied for the identification and differentiation of <i>Malassezia</i> species.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PCR method was able to detect <i>Malassezia</i> in 92.1% of specimens which were also confirmed with microscopic examination. Statistically, a significant association was observed between the results of the two assays (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Moderate agreement was identified between the two methods to diagnose the PV in both populations (Kappa: 0.55). Considering microscopic examination as the gold standard method for confirmation of PV, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value values of the PCR assay for recognition of PV were 85%, 75%, 92%, and 60%, respectively. <i>M. globosa</i> and <i>M. restricta</i> were the most prevalent species isolated from patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, the two-step molecular method based on the amplification of the D1/D2 domain and digestion of the PCR product by one restriction enzyme was able to diagnose and identify <i>Malassezia</i> directly from clinical samples. Consequently, it can be said that the molecular-based method provides more facilities to identify fastidious species, such as <i>M. restricta</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":10863,"journal":{"name":"Current Medical Mycology","volume":"9 1","pages":"28-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10590189/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Medical Mycology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/CMM.2023.345029.1398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Species identification of Malassezia using culture-dependent methods is time-consuming due to their fastidious growth requirements. This study aimed to evaluate a rapid and accurate molecular method in order to diagnose the pityriasis versicolor (PV) and identify Malassezia species from direct clinical samples.

Materials and methods: Skin scraping or tape samples from patients with PV and healthy volunteers as the control group were collected. Diagnosis of PV was confirmed by direct microscopic examination. The DNA extraction was performed according to the steel-bullet beating method. Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism assay using HhaI restriction enzyme was applied for the identification and differentiation of Malassezia species.

Results: The PCR method was able to detect Malassezia in 92.1% of specimens which were also confirmed with microscopic examination. Statistically, a significant association was observed between the results of the two assays (P < 0.001). Moderate agreement was identified between the two methods to diagnose the PV in both populations (Kappa: 0.55). Considering microscopic examination as the gold standard method for confirmation of PV, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value values of the PCR assay for recognition of PV were 85%, 75%, 92%, and 60%, respectively. M. globosa and M. restricta were the most prevalent species isolated from patients.

Conclusion: In this study, the two-step molecular method based on the amplification of the D1/D2 domain and digestion of the PCR product by one restriction enzyme was able to diagnose and identify Malassezia directly from clinical samples. Consequently, it can be said that the molecular-based method provides more facilities to identify fastidious species, such as M. restricta.

Abstract Image

花斑癣患者临床样本中马拉色菌种类的直接分子分析。
背景和目的:马拉色菌的物种鉴定由于其生长要求苛刻,使用依赖培养的方法是耗时的。本研究旨在评估一种快速准确的分子方法,以诊断花斑癣(PV)并从直接临床样本中鉴定马拉色菌属。材料和方法:收集PV患者和健康志愿者作为对照组的皮肤刮片或胶带样本。PV的诊断通过直接显微镜检查得到证实。DNA提取是根据钢弹敲打法进行的。应用HhaI限制性内切酶聚合酶链式反应-限制性片段长度多态性分析法对马拉色菌进行了鉴定和分化。结果:该方法能在92.1%的标本中检测到马拉色菌,显微镜检查也证实了这一点。从统计学角度来看,两种检测结果之间存在显著相关性(P<0.001)。两种方法在两种人群中诊断PV的结果一致(Kappa:0.55)。考虑到显微镜检查是确认PV的金标准方法,其敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值,PCR检测对PV识别的阴性预测值分别为85%、75%、92%和60%。球形分枝杆菌和限制分枝杆菌是从患者身上分离出的最常见的物种。结论:在本研究中,基于D1/D2结构域扩增和一种限制性内切酶消化PCR产物的两步分子方法能够直接从临床样品中诊断和鉴定马拉色菌。因此,可以说,基于分子的方法提供了更多的设施来识别挑剔的物种,如M.restricta。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Medical Mycology
Current Medical Mycology Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信