Differential approach to stroke aphasia and primary progressive aphasia using transcranial magnetic stimulation: A systematic review.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Verónica Pérez-Martínez, Candela Zorzo, Marta Méndez
{"title":"Differential approach to stroke aphasia and primary progressive aphasia using transcranial magnetic stimulation: A systematic review.","authors":"Verónica Pérez-Martínez,&nbsp;Candela Zorzo,&nbsp;Marta Méndez","doi":"10.55782/ane-2023-2433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Language disorders can occur as a consequence of stroke or neurodegenerative disorders, among other causes. Post‑stroke aphasia (PSA) and primary progressive aphasia (PPA) are syndromes that, despite having common features, differ in the brain mechanisms that cause their symptoms. These differences in the underlying functional neuroanatomical changes may influence the way they are addressed by different non‑invasive brain stimulation techniques and, in particular, by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy of rTMS in the treatment of PSA and PPA, as well as the differences in the approach to these disorders using rTMS. To this end, a total of 36 articles were found in the Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed. The results obtained suggest that whereas in PSA, the selection of the stimulation paradigm is based on bi‑hemispheric functional reorganisation models with a tendency towards the application of inhibitory rTMS in the contralateral right hemisphere, in PPA, the application of excitatory rTMS in functionally compromised areas seems to show promising changes. It is concluded that rTMS is a potential treatment in the therapy of both disorders, although differences in the underlying brain mechanisms differentiate the rTMS approach in each case.</p>","PeriodicalId":7032,"journal":{"name":"Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis","volume":"83 3","pages":"280-298"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55782/ane-2023-2433","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Language disorders can occur as a consequence of stroke or neurodegenerative disorders, among other causes. Post‑stroke aphasia (PSA) and primary progressive aphasia (PPA) are syndromes that, despite having common features, differ in the brain mechanisms that cause their symptoms. These differences in the underlying functional neuroanatomical changes may influence the way they are addressed by different non‑invasive brain stimulation techniques and, in particular, by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy of rTMS in the treatment of PSA and PPA, as well as the differences in the approach to these disorders using rTMS. To this end, a total of 36 articles were found in the Web of Science, Scopus, and PubMed. The results obtained suggest that whereas in PSA, the selection of the stimulation paradigm is based on bi‑hemispheric functional reorganisation models with a tendency towards the application of inhibitory rTMS in the contralateral right hemisphere, in PPA, the application of excitatory rTMS in functionally compromised areas seems to show promising changes. It is concluded that rTMS is a potential treatment in the therapy of both disorders, although differences in the underlying brain mechanisms differentiate the rTMS approach in each case.

经颅磁刺激治疗脑卒中失语症和原发性进行性失语症的鉴别方法:一项系统综述。
语言障碍可由中风或神经退行性疾病等原因引起。卒中后失语(PSA)和原发性进行性失语(PPA)是一种综合征,尽管有共同的特征,但导致其症状的大脑机制不同。这些潜在功能性神经解剖学变化的差异可能会影响通过不同的非侵入性脑刺激技术,特别是通过重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)来解决这些变化的方式。本系统综述的目的是评估rTMS在治疗PSA和PPA中的疗效,以及使用rTMS治疗这些疾病的方法的差异。为此,在科学网、Scopus和PubMed上共发现了36篇文章。所获得的结果表明,在PSA中,刺激模式的选择是基于双半球功能重组模型,倾向于在对侧右半球应用抑制性rTMS,而在PPA中,在功能受损区域应用兴奋性rTMS似乎显示出有希望的变化。结论是,rTMS是治疗这两种疾病的潜在治疗方法,尽管在每种情况下,潜在的大脑机制的差异使rTMS方法不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis (ISSN: 0065-1400 (print), eISSN: 1689-0035) covers all aspects of neuroscience, from molecular and cellular neurobiology of the nervous system, through cellular and systems electrophysiology, brain imaging, functional and comparative neuroanatomy, development and evolution of the nervous system, behavior and neuropsychology to brain aging and pathology, including neuroinformatics and modeling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信