The Effect of Various Lasers on the Bond Strength Between Orthodontic Brackets and Dental Ceramics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.8 Q2 SURGERY
Seyed Ali Mosaddad, Jaafar Abduo, Mehrnaz Zakizade, Hamid Tebyaniyan, Ahmed Hussain
{"title":"The Effect of Various Lasers on the Bond Strength Between Orthodontic Brackets and Dental Ceramics: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Seyed Ali Mosaddad, Jaafar Abduo, Mehrnaz Zakizade, Hamid Tebyaniyan, Ahmed Hussain","doi":"10.1089/photob.2023.0098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background/objective:</i></b> This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess how laser conditioning affected brackets bonded to dental ceramics' shear bond strength (SBS). <b><i>Materials and methods:</i></b> The study was conducted by searching Pubmed/Medline, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar up to September 14, 2022. In addition, the reference lists of the relevant articles were checked manually. Articles that compared SBS of laser-treated feldspathic, lithium disilicate, or zirconia surfaces with other standard techniques for bonding metal or ceramic orthodontic brackets were considered. Using a random-effects model, data pooling was carried out as the weighted mean difference (WMD). <b><i>Results:</i></b> This study initially contained 1717 reports, and following review, 32 articles were deemed suitable for our meta-analysis. The pooling results showed that the treatments with lasers such as \"Er:YAG\" [WMD = -1.12 MPa; 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.93 to -0.31], \"Er:YAG + Silane\" (WMD = -3.08 MPa; 95% CI: -4.77 to -1.40), and \"Nd: YAG + Silane\" (WMD = -2.58 MPa; 95% CI: -3.76 to -1.40) had statistically significant lower adhesion values compared with controls. Contrarily, \"Ti:Sapphire femtosecond\" demonstrated significantly higher bonding values (WMD = 0.94 MPa; 95% CI: 0.29-1.60). In contrast, other interventions obtained no statistically significant difference in SBS. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Most of the laser groups showed results comparable with those of conventional approaches. Although more research is necessary for definitive conclusions, laser treatment may be an effective option for treating the surfaces of ceramic materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":94169,"journal":{"name":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","volume":" ","pages":"20-48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/photob.2023.0098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess how laser conditioning affected brackets bonded to dental ceramics' shear bond strength (SBS). Materials and methods: The study was conducted by searching Pubmed/Medline, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar up to September 14, 2022. In addition, the reference lists of the relevant articles were checked manually. Articles that compared SBS of laser-treated feldspathic, lithium disilicate, or zirconia surfaces with other standard techniques for bonding metal or ceramic orthodontic brackets were considered. Using a random-effects model, data pooling was carried out as the weighted mean difference (WMD). Results: This study initially contained 1717 reports, and following review, 32 articles were deemed suitable for our meta-analysis. The pooling results showed that the treatments with lasers such as "Er:YAG" [WMD = -1.12 MPa; 95% confidence interval (CI): -1.93 to -0.31], "Er:YAG + Silane" (WMD = -3.08 MPa; 95% CI: -4.77 to -1.40), and "Nd: YAG + Silane" (WMD = -2.58 MPa; 95% CI: -3.76 to -1.40) had statistically significant lower adhesion values compared with controls. Contrarily, "Ti:Sapphire femtosecond" demonstrated significantly higher bonding values (WMD = 0.94 MPa; 95% CI: 0.29-1.60). In contrast, other interventions obtained no statistically significant difference in SBS. Conclusions: Most of the laser groups showed results comparable with those of conventional approaches. Although more research is necessary for definitive conclusions, laser treatment may be an effective option for treating the surfaces of ceramic materials.

不同激光对正畸托槽与牙科陶瓷结合强度的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景/目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估激光调理如何影响托槽与牙科陶瓷的剪切结合强度(SBS)。材料和方法:截至2022年9月14日,该研究通过搜索Pubmed/Medline、Scopus、Embase、Web of Science、Cochrane Library和Google Scholar进行。此外,还手动检查了相关文章的参考文献列表。考虑了将激光处理的长石、二硅酸锂或氧化锆表面的SBS与其他金属或陶瓷正畸托槽粘合标准技术进行比较的文章。使用随机效应模型,将数据汇集为加权平均差(WMD)。结果:本研究最初包含1717篇报告,经过回顾,32篇文章被认为适合我们的荟萃分析。合并结果表明,激光治疗如“Er:YAG”[MWMD = -1.12 MPa;95%置信区间(CI):-1.93至-0.31],“Er:YAG+硅烷”(WMD = -3.08 MPa;95%置信区间:-4.77至-1.40)和“Nd:YAG+硅烷”(WMD = -2.58 MPa;95%可信区间:-3.76至-1.40)与对照组相比具有统计学上显著较低的粘附值。相反,“钛:蓝宝石飞秒”表现出显著更高的键合值(WMD = 0.94 MPa;95%CI:0.29-1.60)。相反,其他干预措施在SBS方面没有统计学显著差异。结论:大多数激光组的结果与传统方法相当。尽管需要更多的研究才能得出明确的结论,但激光处理可能是处理陶瓷材料表面的有效选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery Editor-in-Chief: Michael R Hamblin, PhD Co-Editor-in-Chief: Heidi Abrahamse, PhD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信