Multiple testing of composite null hypotheses for discrete data using randomized p-values

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Daniel Ochieng, Anh-Tuan Hoang, Thorsten Dickhaus
{"title":"Multiple testing of composite null hypotheses for discrete data using randomized p-values","authors":"Daniel Ochieng,&nbsp;Anh-Tuan Hoang,&nbsp;Thorsten Dickhaus","doi":"10.1002/bimj.202300077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>P</i>-values that are derived from continuously distributed test statistics are typically uniformly distributed on (0,1) under least favorable parameter configurations (LFCs) in the null hypothesis. Conservativeness of a <i>p</i>-value <i>P</i> (meaning that <i>P</i> is under the null hypothesis stochastically larger than uniform on (0,1)) can occur if the test statistic from which <i>P</i> is derived is discrete, or if the true parameter value under the null is not an LFC. To deal with both of these sources of conservativeness, we present two approaches utilizing randomized <i>p</i>-values. We illustrate their effectiveness for testing a composite null hypothesis under a binomial model. We also give an example of how the proposed <i>p</i>-values can be used to test a composite null in group testing designs. We find that the proposed randomized <i>p</i>-values are less conservative compared to nonrandomized <i>p</i>-values under the null hypothesis, but that they are stochastically not smaller under the alternative. The problem of establishing the validity of randomized <i>p</i>-values has received attention in previous literature. We show that our proposed randomized <i>p</i>-values are valid under various discrete statistical models, which are such that the distribution of the corresponding test statistic belongs to an exponential family. The behavior of the power function for the tests based on the proposed randomized <i>p</i>-values as a function of the sample size is also investigated. Simulations and a real data example are used to compare the different considered <i>p</i>-values.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bimj.202300077","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bimj.202300077","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

P-values that are derived from continuously distributed test statistics are typically uniformly distributed on (0,1) under least favorable parameter configurations (LFCs) in the null hypothesis. Conservativeness of a p-value P (meaning that P is under the null hypothesis stochastically larger than uniform on (0,1)) can occur if the test statistic from which P is derived is discrete, or if the true parameter value under the null is not an LFC. To deal with both of these sources of conservativeness, we present two approaches utilizing randomized p-values. We illustrate their effectiveness for testing a composite null hypothesis under a binomial model. We also give an example of how the proposed p-values can be used to test a composite null in group testing designs. We find that the proposed randomized p-values are less conservative compared to nonrandomized p-values under the null hypothesis, but that they are stochastically not smaller under the alternative. The problem of establishing the validity of randomized p-values has received attention in previous literature. We show that our proposed randomized p-values are valid under various discrete statistical models, which are such that the distribution of the corresponding test statistic belongs to an exponential family. The behavior of the power function for the tests based on the proposed randomized p-values as a function of the sample size is also investigated. Simulations and a real data example are used to compare the different considered p-values.

Abstract Image

使用随机p值对离散数据的复合零假设进行多重测试。
从连续分布的测试统计中导出的P值通常在零假设中的最不利参数配置(LFC)下均匀分布在(0,1)上。如果导出p的测试统计量是离散的,或者如果零假设下的真实参数值不是LFC,则p值p的保守性(意味着p在零假设下随机大于(0,1)上的一致性)可能发生。为了处理这两种保守性来源,我们提出了两种利用随机p值的方法。我们说明了它们在二项式模型下测试复合零假设的有效性。我们还举了一个例子,说明如何在组测试设计中使用所提出的p值来测试复合零。我们发现,在零假设下,与非随机p值相比,所提出的随机p值不那么保守,但在替代假设下,它们随机地不更小。建立随机p值有效性的问题在以前的文献中已经受到关注。我们证明了我们提出的随机p值在各种离散统计模型下是有效的,这些模型使得相应的检验统计量的分布属于指数族。还研究了基于所提出的随机p值作为样本量函数的测试的幂函数的行为。使用模拟和实际数据示例来比较所考虑的不同p值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信