Incorporating Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Content Into Bioengineering Curricula: A Program-Level Approach.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 BIOPHYSICS
Molly Y Mollica, Emily Olszewski, Casey L Kiyohara, Danafe D Matusalem, Alexander R Ochs, Princess I Imoukhuede, Michael Regnier, Ken Yasuhara, Wendy E Thomas, Alyssa C Taylor
{"title":"Incorporating Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Content Into Bioengineering Curricula: A Program-Level Approach.","authors":"Molly Y Mollica, Emily Olszewski, Casey L Kiyohara, Danafe D Matusalem, Alexander R Ochs, Princess I Imoukhuede, Michael Regnier, Ken Yasuhara, Wendy E Thomas, Alyssa C Taylor","doi":"10.1115/1.4063819","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) are interconnected with bioengineering, yet have historically been absent from accreditation standards and curricula. Toward educating DEI-competent bioengineers and meeting evolving accreditation requirements, we took a program-level approach to incorporate, catalog, and assess DEI content through the bioengineering undergraduate program. To support instructors in adding DEI content and inclusive pedagogy, our team developed a DEI planning worksheet and surveyed instructors pre- and post-course. Over the academic year, 74% of instructors provided a pre-term and/or post-term response. Of responding instructors, 91% described at least one DEI curricular content improvement, and 88% incorporated at least one new inclusive pedagogical approach. Based on the curricular adjustments reported by instructors, we grouped the bioengineering-related DEI content into five DEI competency categories: bioethics, inclusive design, inclusive scholarship, inclusive professionalism, and systemic inequality. To assess the DEI content incorporation, we employed direct assessment via course assignments, end-of-module student surveys, end-of-term course evaluations, and an end-of-year program review. When asked how much their experience in the program helped them develop specific DEI competencies, students reported a relatively high average of 3.79 (scale of 1 = \"not at all\" to 5 = \"very much\"). Additionally, based on student performance in course assignments and other student feedback, we found that instructors were able to effectively incorporate DEI content into a wide variety of courses. We offer this framework and lessons learned to be adopted by programs similarly motivated to train DEI-competent engineering professionals and provide an equitable, inclusive engineering education for all students.</p>","PeriodicalId":54871,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11003107/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomechanical Engineering-Transactions of the Asme","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4063819","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) are interconnected with bioengineering, yet have historically been absent from accreditation standards and curricula. Toward educating DEI-competent bioengineers and meeting evolving accreditation requirements, we took a program-level approach to incorporate, catalog, and assess DEI content through the bioengineering undergraduate program. To support instructors in adding DEI content and inclusive pedagogy, our team developed a DEI planning worksheet and surveyed instructors pre- and post-course. Over the academic year, 74% of instructors provided a pre-term and/or post-term response. Of responding instructors, 91% described at least one DEI curricular content improvement, and 88% incorporated at least one new inclusive pedagogical approach. Based on the curricular adjustments reported by instructors, we grouped the bioengineering-related DEI content into five DEI competency categories: bioethics, inclusive design, inclusive scholarship, inclusive professionalism, and systemic inequality. To assess the DEI content incorporation, we employed direct assessment via course assignments, end-of-module student surveys, end-of-term course evaluations, and an end-of-year program review. When asked how much their experience in the program helped them develop specific DEI competencies, students reported a relatively high average of 3.79 (scale of 1 = "not at all" to 5 = "very much"). Additionally, based on student performance in course assignments and other student feedback, we found that instructors were able to effectively incorporate DEI content into a wide variety of courses. We offer this framework and lessons learned to be adopted by programs similarly motivated to train DEI-competent engineering professionals and provide an equitable, inclusive engineering education for all students.

将多样性、公平性和包容性内容纳入生物工程课程:一种项目层面的方法。
多样性、公平性和包容性(DEI)与生物工程相互关联,但在历史上一直没有出现在认证标准和课程中。为了培养有能力的DEI生物工程师并满足不断发展的认证要求,我们采取了一种项目层面的方法,通过生物工程本科生项目整合、编目和评估DEI内容。为了支持教师添加DEI内容和包容性教学法,我们的团队制定了DEI规划工作表,并在课程前后对教师进行了调查。在整个学年中,74%的教师做出了回应。在回应的教师中,91%的教师描述了至少一种DEI课程内容的改进,88%的教师至少采用了一种新的包容性教学方法。根据讲师报告的课程调整,我们将与生物工程相关的DEI内容分为五个DEI能力类别:生物伦理学、包容性设计、包容性学术、包容性专业和系统性不平等。为了评估DEI内容的整合,我们通过课程作业、模块末学生调查、期末课程评估和年终课程审查进行了直接评估。当被问及他们在该项目中的经验在多大程度上帮助他们发展了特定的DEI能力时,学生们的平均水平相对较高,为3.79(从1=“根本不”到5=“非常”)。此外,根据学生在课程作业中的表现和其他学生的反馈,我们发现教师能够有效地将DEI内容纳入各种课程中。我们提供了这一框架和经验教训,供类似动机的项目采用,以培训DEI合格的工程专业人员,并提供公平、包容的教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Artificial Organs and Prostheses; Bioinstrumentation and Measurements; Bioheat Transfer; Biomaterials; Biomechanics; Bioprocess Engineering; Cellular Mechanics; Design and Control of Biological Systems; Physiological Systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信