Differential effects of acute cardiovascular exercise on explicit and implicit motor memory: The moderating effects of fitness level

IF 2.2 4区 心理学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
J. Cristini , V.S. Kraft , B. De las Heras , L. Rodrigues , Z. Parwanta , J. Hermsdörfer , S. Steib , M. Roig
{"title":"Differential effects of acute cardiovascular exercise on explicit and implicit motor memory: The moderating effects of fitness level","authors":"J. Cristini ,&nbsp;V.S. Kraft ,&nbsp;B. De las Heras ,&nbsp;L. Rodrigues ,&nbsp;Z. Parwanta ,&nbsp;J. Hermsdörfer ,&nbsp;S. Steib ,&nbsp;M. Roig","doi":"10.1016/j.nlm.2023.107846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A single bout of cardiovascular exercise (CE) performed after practice can facilitate the consolidation of motor memory. However, the effect is variable and may be modulated by different factors such as the motor task’s or participant’s characteristics and level of awareness during encoding (implicit vs explicit learning). This study examines the effects of acute CE on the consolidation of motor sequences learned explicitly and implicitly, exploring the potential moderating effect of fitness level and awareness. Fifty-six healthy adults (24.1 ± 3.3 years, 32 female) were recruited. After practicing with either the implicit or explicit variant of the Serial Reaction Time Task (SRTT), participants either performed a bout of 16 min of vigorous CE or rested for the same amount of time. Consolidation was quantified as the change in SRTT performance from the end of practice to a 24 h retention test. Fitness level (V̇O<sub>2peak</sub>) was determined through a graded exercise test. Awareness (implicit vs explicit learning) was operationalized using a free recall test conducted immediately after retention. Our primary analysis indicated that CE had no statistically significant effects on consolidation, regardless of the SRTT’s variant utilized during practice. However, an exploratory analysis, classifying participants based on the level of awareness gained during motor practice, showed that CE negatively influenced consolidation in unfit participants who explicitly acquired the motor sequence. Our findings indicate that fitness level and awareness in sequence acquisition can modulate the interaction between CE and motor memory consolidation. These factors should be taken into account when assessing the effects of CE on motor memory.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19102,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Learning and Memory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Learning and Memory","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1074742723001272","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A single bout of cardiovascular exercise (CE) performed after practice can facilitate the consolidation of motor memory. However, the effect is variable and may be modulated by different factors such as the motor task’s or participant’s characteristics and level of awareness during encoding (implicit vs explicit learning). This study examines the effects of acute CE on the consolidation of motor sequences learned explicitly and implicitly, exploring the potential moderating effect of fitness level and awareness. Fifty-six healthy adults (24.1 ± 3.3 years, 32 female) were recruited. After practicing with either the implicit or explicit variant of the Serial Reaction Time Task (SRTT), participants either performed a bout of 16 min of vigorous CE or rested for the same amount of time. Consolidation was quantified as the change in SRTT performance from the end of practice to a 24 h retention test. Fitness level (V̇O2peak) was determined through a graded exercise test. Awareness (implicit vs explicit learning) was operationalized using a free recall test conducted immediately after retention. Our primary analysis indicated that CE had no statistically significant effects on consolidation, regardless of the SRTT’s variant utilized during practice. However, an exploratory analysis, classifying participants based on the level of awareness gained during motor practice, showed that CE negatively influenced consolidation in unfit participants who explicitly acquired the motor sequence. Our findings indicate that fitness level and awareness in sequence acquisition can modulate the interaction between CE and motor memory consolidation. These factors should be taken into account when assessing the effects of CE on motor memory.

急性心血管运动对外显和内隐运动记忆的不同影响:体能水平的调节作用。
练习后进行一次心血管运动(CE)可以促进运动记忆的巩固。然而,这种效果是可变的,可能会受到不同因素的调节,如运动任务或参与者的特征和编码过程中的意识水平(内隐学习与外显学习)。本研究考察了急性CE对显性和隐性学习的运动序列巩固的影响,探讨了健身水平和意识的潜在调节作用。56名健康成年人(24.1±3.3岁,32名女性)被招募。在练习了序列反应时间任务(SRTT)的内隐或外显变体后,参与者要么进行一轮16分钟的剧烈CE,要么休息相同的时间。固结被量化为从实践结束到24小时保留试验SRTT性能的变化。健身水平(V̇O2peak)通过分级运动测试确定。意识(内隐学习与外显学习)在保留后立即使用免费回忆测试进行操作。我们的初步分析表明,无论在实践中使用SRTT的变体,CE对固结没有统计学上的显著影响。然而,一项探索性分析,根据运动练习中获得的意识水平对参与者进行分类,表明CE对明确获得运动序列的不适合参与者的巩固产生了负面影响。我们的研究结果表明,序列获取中的适应度水平和意识可以调节CE和运动记忆巩固之间的相互作用。在评估CE对运动记忆的影响时,应考虑这些因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
7.40%
发文量
77
审稿时长
12.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurobiology of Learning and Memory publishes articles examining the neurobiological mechanisms underlying learning and memory at all levels of analysis ranging from molecular biology to synaptic and neural plasticity and behavior. We are especially interested in manuscripts that examine the neural circuits and molecular mechanisms underlying learning, memory and plasticity in both experimental animals and human subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信