Measurement of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Strain Using MR Deformable Image Registration: Accuracy and Relationship to Recent Aneurysm Progression.

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Investigative Radiology Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-19 DOI:10.1097/RLI.0000000000001035
Huiming Dong, Joseph R Leach, Evan Kao, Ang Zhou, Teodora Chitiboi, Chengcheng Zhu, Megan Ballweber, Fei Jiang, Yoo Jin Lee, James Iannuzzi, Warren Gasper, David Saloner, Michael D Hope, Dimitrios Mitsouras
{"title":"Measurement of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Strain Using MR Deformable Image Registration: Accuracy and Relationship to Recent Aneurysm Progression.","authors":"Huiming Dong, Joseph R Leach, Evan Kao, Ang Zhou, Teodora Chitiboi, Chengcheng Zhu, Megan Ballweber, Fei Jiang, Yoo Jin Lee, James Iannuzzi, Warren Gasper, David Saloner, Michael D Hope, Dimitrios Mitsouras","doi":"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Management of asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) based on maximum aneurysm diameter and growth rate fails to preempt many ruptures. Assessment of aortic wall biomechanical properties may improve assessment of progression and rupture risk. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of AAA wall strain measured by cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) deformable image registration (MR strain) and investigate its relationship with recent AAA progression.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The MR strain accuracy was evaluated in silico against ground truth strain in 54 synthetic MRIs generated from a finite element model simulation of an AAA patient's abdomen for different aortic pulse pressures, tissue motions, signal intensity variations, and image noise. Evaluation included bias with 95% confidence interval (CI) and correlation analysis. Association of MR strain with AAA growth rate was assessed in 25 consecutive patients with >6 months of prior surveillance, for whom cine balanced steady-state free-precession imaging was acquired at the level of the AAA as well as the proximal, normal-caliber aorta. Univariate and multivariate regressions were used to associate growth rate with clinical variables, maximum AAA diameter (D max ), and peak circumferential MR strain through the cardiac cycle. The MR strain interoperator variability was assessed using bias with 95% CI, intraclass correlation coefficient, and coefficient of variation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In silico experiments revealed an MR strain bias of 0.48% ± 0.42% and a slope of correlation to ground truth strain of 0.963. In vivo, AAA MR strain (1.2% ± 0.6%) was highly reproducible (bias ± 95% CI, 0.03% ± 0.31%; intraclass correlation coefficient, 97.8%; coefficient of variation, 7.14%) and was lower than in the nonaneurysmal aorta (2.4% ± 1.7%). D max ( β = 0.087) and MR strain ( β = -1.563) were both associated with AAA growth rate. The MR strain remained an independent factor associated with growth rate ( β = -0.904) after controlling for D max .</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Deformable image registration analysis can accurately measure the circumferential strain of the AAA wall from standard cine MRI and may offer patient-specific insight regarding AAA progression.</p>","PeriodicalId":14486,"journal":{"name":"Investigative Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11026303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001035","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Management of asymptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) based on maximum aneurysm diameter and growth rate fails to preempt many ruptures. Assessment of aortic wall biomechanical properties may improve assessment of progression and rupture risk. This study aimed to assess the accuracy of AAA wall strain measured by cine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) deformable image registration (MR strain) and investigate its relationship with recent AAA progression.

Methods: The MR strain accuracy was evaluated in silico against ground truth strain in 54 synthetic MRIs generated from a finite element model simulation of an AAA patient's abdomen for different aortic pulse pressures, tissue motions, signal intensity variations, and image noise. Evaluation included bias with 95% confidence interval (CI) and correlation analysis. Association of MR strain with AAA growth rate was assessed in 25 consecutive patients with >6 months of prior surveillance, for whom cine balanced steady-state free-precession imaging was acquired at the level of the AAA as well as the proximal, normal-caliber aorta. Univariate and multivariate regressions were used to associate growth rate with clinical variables, maximum AAA diameter (D max ), and peak circumferential MR strain through the cardiac cycle. The MR strain interoperator variability was assessed using bias with 95% CI, intraclass correlation coefficient, and coefficient of variation.

Results: In silico experiments revealed an MR strain bias of 0.48% ± 0.42% and a slope of correlation to ground truth strain of 0.963. In vivo, AAA MR strain (1.2% ± 0.6%) was highly reproducible (bias ± 95% CI, 0.03% ± 0.31%; intraclass correlation coefficient, 97.8%; coefficient of variation, 7.14%) and was lower than in the nonaneurysmal aorta (2.4% ± 1.7%). D max ( β = 0.087) and MR strain ( β = -1.563) were both associated with AAA growth rate. The MR strain remained an independent factor associated with growth rate ( β = -0.904) after controlling for D max .

Conclusions: Deformable image registration analysis can accurately measure the circumferential strain of the AAA wall from standard cine MRI and may offer patient-specific insight regarding AAA progression.

使用MR可变形图像配准测量腹主动脉瘤应变:准确性及其与近期动脉瘤进展的关系。
背景:基于最大动脉瘤直径和生长率的无症状腹主动脉瘤(AAA)治疗不能预防许多破裂。评估主动脉壁生物力学特性可以改善对进展和破裂风险的评估。本研究旨在评估电影磁共振成像(MRI)可变形图像配准(MR应变)测量AAA壁应变的准确性,并研究其与最近AAA进展的关系。方法:在不同主动脉脉压、组织运动、信号强度变化和图像噪声的情况下,根据AAA患者腹部的有限元模型模拟生成的54个合成MRI中的真实应变,在计算机上评估MR应变的准确性。评估包括95%置信区间的偏倚和相关分析。在25名既往监测时间>6个月的连续患者中评估了MR应变与AAA生长率的相关性,这些患者在AAA水平以及近端正常口径主动脉上获得了电影平衡稳态自由进动成像。使用单变量和多变量回归将生长率与临床变量、最大AAA直径(Dmax)和整个心动周期的峰值周向MR应变相关联。使用95%置信区间的偏差、组内相关系数和变异系数评估MR菌株互操作性变异性。结果:计算机实验显示,MR应变偏差为0.48%±0.42%,与地面真实应变的相关斜率为0.963。在体内,AAA MR株(1.2%±0.6%)具有高度可重复性(偏倚±95%CI,0.03%±0.31%;组内相关系数,97.8%;变异系数,7.14%),低于非动脉瘤主动脉(2.4%±1.7%)。Dmax(β=0.087)和MR株(β=-1.563)均与AAA生长率相关。在控制Dmax后,MR应变仍然是与生长率相关的独立因素(β=-0.904)。结论:可变形图像配准分析可以从标准电影MRI中准确测量AAA壁的周向应变,并可以为患者提供有关AAA进展的特定见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Investigative Radiology
Investigative Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
16.40%
发文量
188
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Investigative Radiology publishes original, peer-reviewed reports on clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, and related modalities. Emphasis is on early and timely publication. Primarily research-oriented, the journal also includes a wide variety of features of interest to clinical radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信