Screening for Cystic Fibrosis Related Complications in the Context of a Pandemic and Altered Models of Care.

IF 2.4 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health Services Insights Pub Date : 2023-10-16 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/11786329231205145
Michael Doumit, Roxanne Strachan, Raynuka Lazarus, Peter Middleton, Ruth Dentice, Jessica Marouvo, Laura Jeffrey, Hiran Selvadurai, Sheila Sivam, Verity Pacey, Adam Jaffe, Kelly Gray
{"title":"Screening for Cystic Fibrosis Related Complications in the Context of a Pandemic and Altered Models of Care.","authors":"Michael Doumit,&nbsp;Roxanne Strachan,&nbsp;Raynuka Lazarus,&nbsp;Peter Middleton,&nbsp;Ruth Dentice,&nbsp;Jessica Marouvo,&nbsp;Laura Jeffrey,&nbsp;Hiran Selvadurai,&nbsp;Sheila Sivam,&nbsp;Verity Pacey,&nbsp;Adam Jaffe,&nbsp;Kelly Gray","doi":"10.1177/11786329231205145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Standard of care recommend that patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) require screening investigations to assess for complications. Changing models of care due to the COVID19 pandemic may have impacted completion of recommended screening.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the frequency of screening investigations completed in people with CF before and after the onset of the COVID19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records were reviewed at 4 CF-specialist centers to identify screening investigations completed in the 12-months before and after pandemic onset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Records of 625 patients were reviewed. Prior to pandemic onset, there was between center variability in completion of screening investigations. There was greatest baseline variation between centers in performing oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT); range 38%-69%, exercise tests; 3%-51% and sputum screening for non-tuberculous mycobacteria; 53%-81%. Following pandemic onset, blood tests, and sputum cultures were maintained at the highest rates. Exercise testing, CXR and OGTT exhibited the greatest declines, with reductions at individual centers ranging between 10%-24%, 22%-43%, and 20%-26%, respectively. Return to in-person visits following pandemic onset was variable, ranging from 16% to 74% between centers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Completion of screening investigations varies between CF centers and changes in models of care, such as increased virtual care in response to COVID19 pandemic was associated with reduction in completion of investigations. Centers would benefit from auditing their adherence to standards of care, particularly considering recent changes in care delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12876,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Insights","volume":"16 ","pages":"11786329231205145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10580724/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/11786329231205145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Standard of care recommend that patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) require screening investigations to assess for complications. Changing models of care due to the COVID19 pandemic may have impacted completion of recommended screening.

Objective: To compare the frequency of screening investigations completed in people with CF before and after the onset of the COVID19 pandemic.

Methods: Medical records were reviewed at 4 CF-specialist centers to identify screening investigations completed in the 12-months before and after pandemic onset.

Results: Records of 625 patients were reviewed. Prior to pandemic onset, there was between center variability in completion of screening investigations. There was greatest baseline variation between centers in performing oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT); range 38%-69%, exercise tests; 3%-51% and sputum screening for non-tuberculous mycobacteria; 53%-81%. Following pandemic onset, blood tests, and sputum cultures were maintained at the highest rates. Exercise testing, CXR and OGTT exhibited the greatest declines, with reductions at individual centers ranging between 10%-24%, 22%-43%, and 20%-26%, respectively. Return to in-person visits following pandemic onset was variable, ranging from 16% to 74% between centers.

Conclusion: Completion of screening investigations varies between CF centers and changes in models of care, such as increased virtual care in response to COVID19 pandemic was associated with reduction in completion of investigations. Centers would benefit from auditing their adherence to standards of care, particularly considering recent changes in care delivery.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在大流行病和改变护理模式的背景下筛查囊性纤维化相关并发症。
背景:护理标准建议囊性纤维化(CF)患者需要进行筛查以评估并发症。新冠肺炎疫情导致的护理模式变化可能影响了建议筛查的完成。目的:比较新冠肺炎疫情爆发前后CF患者完成筛查调查的频率。方法:对4个CF专家中心的医疗记录进行审查,以确定在大流行爆发前后12个月内完成的筛查调查。结果:回顾了625例患者的病历。在新冠疫情爆发之前,在完成筛查调查方面存在中心之间的变异性。在进行口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)时,各中心之间的基线差异最大;范围38%-69%,运动测试;3%-51%,痰中非结核分枝杆菌筛查;53%~81%。疫情爆发后,血液检测和痰培养保持在最高水平。运动测试、CXR和OGTT的下降幅度最大,单个中心的下降幅度分别在10%-24%、22%-43%和20%-26%之间。在新冠疫情爆发后,亲自就诊的比例各不相同,各中心之间的比例从16%到74%不等。结论:CF中心的筛查调查完成情况各不相同,护理模式的变化,如应对新冠肺炎疫情而增加的虚拟护理19,与调查完成情况的减少有关。中心将从审计其对护理标准的遵守情况中受益,特别是考虑到最近护理服务的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Services Insights
Health Services Insights HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信