Influence of frontal-to-parietal connectivity in pseudoneglect: A cortico-cortical paired associative stimulation study

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Giacomo Guidali , Chiara Bagattini , Matteo De Matola , Debora Brignani
{"title":"Influence of frontal-to-parietal connectivity in pseudoneglect: A cortico-cortical paired associative stimulation study","authors":"Giacomo Guidali ,&nbsp;Chiara Bagattini ,&nbsp;Matteo De Matola ,&nbsp;Debora Brignani","doi":"10.1016/j.cortex.2023.08.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Pseudoneglect is a set of visuospatial biases that entails a behavioral advantage for stimuli appearing in the left hemifield compared to the right one. Although right hemisphere dominance for visuospatial processing has been invoked to explain this phenomenon, its neurophysiological mechanisms are still debated, and the role of intra- and inter-hemispheric connectivity is yet to be defined. The present study explored the possibility of modulating pseudoneglect in healthy participants through a cortico-cortical <em>paired associative stimulation</em> protocol (ccPAS): a non-invasive brain stimulation protocol that manipulates the interplay between brain regions through the repeated, time-locked coupling of two transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulses. In the first experiment, healthy participants underwent a frontal-to-parietal (FP) and a parietal-to-frontal (PF) ccPAS. In the FP protocol, the first TMS pulse targeted the right frontal eye field (FEF), and the second pulse the right inferior parietal lobule (IPL), two critical areas for visuospatial and attentional processing. In the PF condition, the order of the pulses was reversed. In both protocols, the inter-stimulus interval (ISI) was 10 ms. Before and after stimulation, pseudoneglect was assessed with a landmark task and a manual line bisection task. A second experiment controlled for ccPAS timing dependency by testing FP-ccPAS with a longer ISI of 100 ms. Results showed that after administering the FP-ccPAS with the ISI of 10 ms, participants’ leftward bias in the landmark task increased significantly, with no effects in the manual line bisection task. The other two protocols tested were ineffective. Our findings showed that ccPAS could be used to modulate pseudoneglect by exploiting frontal-to-parietal connectivity, possibly through increased top-down attentional control. FP-ccPAS could represent a promising tool to investigate connectivity properties within visuospatial and attentional networks in the healthy and as a potential rehabilitation protocol in patients suffering from severe visuospatial pathologies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10758,"journal":{"name":"Cortex","volume":"169 ","pages":"Pages 50-64"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cortex","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945223002216","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Pseudoneglect is a set of visuospatial biases that entails a behavioral advantage for stimuli appearing in the left hemifield compared to the right one. Although right hemisphere dominance for visuospatial processing has been invoked to explain this phenomenon, its neurophysiological mechanisms are still debated, and the role of intra- and inter-hemispheric connectivity is yet to be defined. The present study explored the possibility of modulating pseudoneglect in healthy participants through a cortico-cortical paired associative stimulation protocol (ccPAS): a non-invasive brain stimulation protocol that manipulates the interplay between brain regions through the repeated, time-locked coupling of two transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulses. In the first experiment, healthy participants underwent a frontal-to-parietal (FP) and a parietal-to-frontal (PF) ccPAS. In the FP protocol, the first TMS pulse targeted the right frontal eye field (FEF), and the second pulse the right inferior parietal lobule (IPL), two critical areas for visuospatial and attentional processing. In the PF condition, the order of the pulses was reversed. In both protocols, the inter-stimulus interval (ISI) was 10 ms. Before and after stimulation, pseudoneglect was assessed with a landmark task and a manual line bisection task. A second experiment controlled for ccPAS timing dependency by testing FP-ccPAS with a longer ISI of 100 ms. Results showed that after administering the FP-ccPAS with the ISI of 10 ms, participants’ leftward bias in the landmark task increased significantly, with no effects in the manual line bisection task. The other two protocols tested were ineffective. Our findings showed that ccPAS could be used to modulate pseudoneglect by exploiting frontal-to-parietal connectivity, possibly through increased top-down attentional control. FP-ccPAS could represent a promising tool to investigate connectivity properties within visuospatial and attentional networks in the healthy and as a potential rehabilitation protocol in patients suffering from severe visuospatial pathologies.

假性忽视患者额顶叶连接的影响:一项皮质配对联想刺激研究。
伪忽视是一组视觉空间偏差,与右半球相比,左半球出现的刺激具有行为优势。尽管右半球在视觉空间处理中的主导地位已被用来解释这一现象,但其神经生理学机制仍存在争议,半球内和半球间连接的作用尚待确定。本研究探讨了通过皮质配对联合刺激方案(ccPAS)调节健康参与者假性忽视的可能性:ccPAS是一种非侵入性大脑刺激方案,通过两个经颅磁刺激(TMS)脉冲的重复、时间锁定耦合来操纵大脑区域之间的相互作用。在第一个实验中,健康参与者接受了额到顶(FP)和顶到额(PF)ccPAS。在FP方案中,第一个TMS脉冲针对右额视野(FEF),第二个脉冲针对右顶叶下小叶(IPL),这是视觉空间和注意力处理的两个关键区域。在PF条件下,脉冲的顺序被颠倒。在两种方案中,刺激间隔(ISI)均为10ms。在刺激前后,用标志性任务和手动平分线任务评估假性忽视。第二个实验通过用100ms的较长ISI测试FP ccPAS来控制ccPAS时序依赖性。结果显示,在给予ISI为10ms的FP ccPAS后,参与者在里程碑任务中的左倾倾向显著增加,而在手动平分线任务中没有影响。测试的另外两个方案无效。我们的研究结果表明,ccPAS可以通过利用额顶叶的连接,可能通过增加自上而下的注意力控制,来调节假性忽视。FP ccPAS可能是一种很有前途的工具,用于研究健康人视觉空间和注意力网络中的连接特性,并作为患有严重视觉空间病理的患者的潜在康复方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cortex
Cortex 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
250
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: CORTEX is an international journal devoted to the study of cognition and of the relationship between the nervous system and mental processes, particularly as these are reflected in the behaviour of patients with acquired brain lesions, normal volunteers, children with typical and atypical development, and in the activation of brain regions and systems as recorded by functional neuroimaging techniques. It was founded in 1964 by Ennio De Renzi.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信