Frontal-midline theta and posterior alpha oscillations index early processing of spatial representations during active navigation

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Yu Karen Du , Mingli Liang , Andrew S. McAvan , Robert C. Wilson , Arne D. Ekstrom
{"title":"Frontal-midline theta and posterior alpha oscillations index early processing of spatial representations during active navigation","authors":"Yu Karen Du ,&nbsp;Mingli Liang ,&nbsp;Andrew S. McAvan ,&nbsp;Robert C. Wilson ,&nbsp;Arne D. Ekstrom","doi":"10.1016/j.cortex.2023.09.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Previous research has demonstrated that humans combine multiple sources of spatial information such as self-motion and landmark cues while navigating through an environment. However, it is unclear whether this involves comparing multiple representations obtained from different sources during navigation (parallel hypothesis) or building a representation first based on self-motion cues and then combining with landmarks later (serial hypothesis). We tested these two hypotheses (parallel <em>vs</em><span> serial) in an active navigation task using wireless mobile scalp EEG recordings. Participants walked through an immersive virtual hallway with or without conflicts between self-motion and landmarks (i.e., intersections) and pointed toward the starting position of the hallway. We employed the oscillatory signals recorded during mobile wireless scalp EEG as a means of identifying when participant representations based on self-motion versus landmark cues might have first emerged. We found that path segments, including intersections present early during navigation, were more strongly associated with later pointing error, regardless of when they appeared during encoding. We also found that there was sufficient information contained within the frontal-midline theta and posterior alpha oscillatory signals in the earliest segments of navigation involving intersections to decode condition (i.e., conflicting </span><em>vs</em><span> not conflicting). Together, these findings suggest that intersections play a pivotal role in the early development of spatial representations, suggesting that memory representations for the geometry of walked paths likely develop early during navigation, in support of the parallel hypothesis.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":10758,"journal":{"name":"Cortex","volume":"169 ","pages":"Pages 65-80"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cortex","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945223002320","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research has demonstrated that humans combine multiple sources of spatial information such as self-motion and landmark cues while navigating through an environment. However, it is unclear whether this involves comparing multiple representations obtained from different sources during navigation (parallel hypothesis) or building a representation first based on self-motion cues and then combining with landmarks later (serial hypothesis). We tested these two hypotheses (parallel vs serial) in an active navigation task using wireless mobile scalp EEG recordings. Participants walked through an immersive virtual hallway with or without conflicts between self-motion and landmarks (i.e., intersections) and pointed toward the starting position of the hallway. We employed the oscillatory signals recorded during mobile wireless scalp EEG as a means of identifying when participant representations based on self-motion versus landmark cues might have first emerged. We found that path segments, including intersections present early during navigation, were more strongly associated with later pointing error, regardless of when they appeared during encoding. We also found that there was sufficient information contained within the frontal-midline theta and posterior alpha oscillatory signals in the earliest segments of navigation involving intersections to decode condition (i.e., conflicting vs not conflicting). Together, these findings suggest that intersections play a pivotal role in the early development of spatial representations, suggesting that memory representations for the geometry of walked paths likely develop early during navigation, in support of the parallel hypothesis.

在主动导航过程中,前中线θ和后α振荡指数对空间表示的早期处理。
先前的研究表明,人类在环境中导航时结合了多种空间信息来源,如自我运动和地标线索。然而,尚不清楚这是涉及比较导航期间从不同来源获得的多个表示(平行假设),还是首先基于自运动线索构建表示,然后再与地标组合(串行假设)。我们使用无线移动头皮脑电图记录在主动导航任务中测试了这两个假设(并行与串行)。参与者穿过身临其境的虚拟走廊,无论是否有自我动作和地标(即十字路口)之间的冲突,并指向走廊的起始位置。我们采用了在移动无线头皮EEG过程中记录的振荡信号,作为识别参与者何时首次出现基于自我运动和地标线索的表征的一种手段。我们发现,无论路径段在编码过程中何时出现,路径段(包括导航过程中早期出现的交叉点)都与后期的指向错误有更强的关联。我们还发现,在涉及交叉口的导航的最早片段中,前部中线θ和后部α振荡信号中包含足够的信息来解码条件(即,冲突与不冲突)。总之,这些发现表明,十字路口在空间表征的早期发展中发挥着关键作用,这表明步行路径几何形状的记忆表征可能在导航过程中早期发展,这支持了平行假说。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cortex
Cortex 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
250
审稿时长
74 days
期刊介绍: CORTEX is an international journal devoted to the study of cognition and of the relationship between the nervous system and mental processes, particularly as these are reflected in the behaviour of patients with acquired brain lesions, normal volunteers, children with typical and atypical development, and in the activation of brain regions and systems as recorded by functional neuroimaging techniques. It was founded in 1964 by Ennio De Renzi.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信