Pain reduction, physical performance, and psychological status compared between Hatha yoga and stretching exercise to treat sedentary office workers with mild/moderate neck/shoulder pain: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE
V. Kuptniratsaikul , C. Muaksorn , C. Koedwan , O. Suesuwan , A. Srisomnuek
{"title":"Pain reduction, physical performance, and psychological status compared between Hatha yoga and stretching exercise to treat sedentary office workers with mild/moderate neck/shoulder pain: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial","authors":"V. Kuptniratsaikul ,&nbsp;C. Muaksorn ,&nbsp;C. Koedwan ,&nbsp;O. Suesuwan ,&nbsp;A. Srisomnuek","doi":"10.1016/j.ctim.2023.102996","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate pain reduction, physical performance, and psychological status compared between Hatha yoga and stretching exercises.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Randomized controlled non-inferiority trial</p></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><p>150 sedentary office workers with mild/moderate neck/shoulder pain.</p></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><p>Participants received group Hatha yoga or stretching exercise once a week (30 min for 4 weeks), and were asked to practice at home. Subjects were followed up at 4 and 8 weeks.</p></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>The primary outcome was a numeric rating scale (NRS) score. The secondary outcomes were a sit-and-reach test, Functional Reach Test, Neck Disability Index, pain pressure threshold, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, General Anxiety Disorder-7, and the EuroQoL.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 150 subjects, 59 and 71 participants in the Hatha yoga and stretching groups were analyzed. At baseline, no significant differences between groups were found. After 4 weeks, the mean difference in the NRS score was statistically significant between groups (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), including a 95% confidence level of &lt; 1 score, but there was no significant difference between groups for any other outcome. Most participants reported being satisfied with their assigned treatment (98.3–100%), and rated themselves as improved or much improved (91.8–98.3%) (both <em>p</em> &gt; 0.05 between groups). The most common adverse events were musculoskeletal pain and muscle tension. Repeated measures analysis of variance that compared among weeks 0, 4, and 8 revealed no significant difference between groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Hatha yoga was tentatively found to be non-inferior to stretching exercise relative to safety, for decreasing pain, anxiety, and depression, and for improving flexibility, neck functions, and quality of life.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10545,"journal":{"name":"Complementary therapies in medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229923000833/pdfft?md5=5fcfdfad4a9c6fb43ba2b18fe22d8c5f&pid=1-s2.0-S0965229923000833-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Complementary therapies in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965229923000833","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To investigate pain reduction, physical performance, and psychological status compared between Hatha yoga and stretching exercises.

Design

Randomized controlled non-inferiority trial

Subjects

150 sedentary office workers with mild/moderate neck/shoulder pain.

Interventions

Participants received group Hatha yoga or stretching exercise once a week (30 min for 4 weeks), and were asked to practice at home. Subjects were followed up at 4 and 8 weeks.

Main outcome measures

The primary outcome was a numeric rating scale (NRS) score. The secondary outcomes were a sit-and-reach test, Functional Reach Test, Neck Disability Index, pain pressure threshold, Patient Health Questionnaire-9, General Anxiety Disorder-7, and the EuroQoL.

Results

Of the 150 subjects, 59 and 71 participants in the Hatha yoga and stretching groups were analyzed. At baseline, no significant differences between groups were found. After 4 weeks, the mean difference in the NRS score was statistically significant between groups (p < 0.001), including a 95% confidence level of < 1 score, but there was no significant difference between groups for any other outcome. Most participants reported being satisfied with their assigned treatment (98.3–100%), and rated themselves as improved or much improved (91.8–98.3%) (both p > 0.05 between groups). The most common adverse events were musculoskeletal pain and muscle tension. Repeated measures analysis of variance that compared among weeks 0, 4, and 8 revealed no significant difference between groups.

Conclusion

Hatha yoga was tentatively found to be non-inferior to stretching exercise relative to safety, for decreasing pain, anxiety, and depression, and for improving flexibility, neck functions, and quality of life.

比较哈塔瑜伽和拉伸运动治疗轻度/中度颈肩部疼痛久坐办公人员的疼痛减轻、身体表现和心理状态:一项随机对照非劣效性试验。
目的:比较哈他瑜伽和伸展运动的止痛效果、身体表现和心理状态。设计:随机对照非劣效性试验受试者:150名久坐不动的上班族,轻度/中度颈肩部疼痛。干预措施:参与者每周接受一次哈塔瑜伽或拉伸运动(为期4周,每次30分钟),并被要求在家练习。受试者在第4周和第8周进行随访。主要结果测量:主要结果是数字评定量表(NRS)得分。次要结果是坐位和伸展测试、功能性伸展测试、颈部残疾指数、疼痛压力阈值、患者健康问卷-9、全身焦虑障碍-7和EuroQoL。结果:在150名受试者中,对哈塔瑜伽和拉伸组的59名和71名参与者进行了分析。在基线时,各组之间没有发现显著差异。4周后,各组NRS评分的平均差异具有统计学意义(p0.05)。最常见的不良事件是肌肉骨骼疼痛和肌肉紧张。第0、4和8周间的重复测量方差分析显示,各组之间没有显著差异。结论:哈塔瑜伽在安全性、减少疼痛、焦虑和抑郁、改善柔韧性、颈部功能和生活质量方面不亚于伸展运动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Complementary therapies in medicine
Complementary therapies in medicine 医学-全科医学与补充医学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
101
审稿时长
112 days
期刊介绍: Complementary Therapies in Medicine is an international, peer-reviewed journal that has considerable appeal to anyone who seeks objective and critical information on complementary therapies or who wishes to deepen their understanding of these approaches. It will be of particular interest to healthcare practitioners including family practitioners, complementary therapists, nurses, and physiotherapists; to academics including social scientists and CAM researchers; to healthcare managers; and to patients. Complementary Therapies in Medicine aims to publish valid, relevant and rigorous research and serious discussion articles with the main purpose of improving healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信