Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Outcomes of New Cerebral Microbleeds After Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine
Clinical Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-19 DOI:10.1007/s00062-023-01357-0
Zhenxiang Zhan, Fangwang Fu, Wenyuan Zhang, Zicheng Cheng
{"title":"Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Outcomes of New Cerebral Microbleeds After Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Zhenxiang Zhan, Fangwang Fu, Wenyuan Zhang, Zicheng Cheng","doi":"10.1007/s00062-023-01357-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are common in the elderly population, and are associated with an increased risk of stroke and dementia. An acute ischemic stroke event can make CMBs develop rapidly. However, the progression of CMBs after intravenous thrombolysis is not well understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following a previously registered protocol, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases were systematically searched to identify relevant literature up to August 2022. Cohort studies that reported new CMBs in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing intravenous thrombolysis were included. Random effects models were used to calculate the pooled estimates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies with 1079 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled new CMBs prevalence was 7.6% (95% CI 3.9-14.3%) and 63.6% new CMBs were located in the cerebral lobes. Compared with patients without new CMBs, those with new CMBs were older, had a higher proportion of hypertension, and had higher systolic blood pressure and baseline CMBs burden. The presence of new CMBs increased the likelihood of remote intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 28.75, 95% CI 8.58-96.38) and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 15.49, 95% CI 3.21-74.73) but was not related to functional outcomes or hemorrhagic transformation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The prevalence of new CMBs after intravenous thrombolysis was approximately 7.6%. The presence of new CMBs is associated with remote and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage following intravenous thrombolysis. Considering the potential long-term adverse effects of CMBs progression, patients at a high risk of developing new CMBs should be identified based on potential risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":10391,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"209-218"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-023-01357-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are common in the elderly population, and are associated with an increased risk of stroke and dementia. An acute ischemic stroke event can make CMBs develop rapidly. However, the progression of CMBs after intravenous thrombolysis is not well understood.

Methods: Following a previously registered protocol, PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases were systematically searched to identify relevant literature up to August 2022. Cohort studies that reported new CMBs in patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing intravenous thrombolysis were included. Random effects models were used to calculate the pooled estimates.

Results: Seven studies with 1079 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled new CMBs prevalence was 7.6% (95% CI 3.9-14.3%) and 63.6% new CMBs were located in the cerebral lobes. Compared with patients without new CMBs, those with new CMBs were older, had a higher proportion of hypertension, and had higher systolic blood pressure and baseline CMBs burden. The presence of new CMBs increased the likelihood of remote intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 28.75, 95% CI 8.58-96.38) and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 15.49, 95% CI 3.21-74.73) but was not related to functional outcomes or hemorrhagic transformation.

Conclusions: The prevalence of new CMBs after intravenous thrombolysis was approximately 7.6%. The presence of new CMBs is associated with remote and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage following intravenous thrombolysis. Considering the potential long-term adverse effects of CMBs progression, patients at a high risk of developing new CMBs should be identified based on potential risk factors.

Abstract Image

急性缺血性卒中静脉溶栓后新发脑微出血的患病率、危险因素和临床结果:系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:脑微出血在老年人群中很常见,与中风和痴呆的风险增加有关。急性缺血性中风事件可使CMBs迅速发展。然而,静脉溶栓后CMBs的进展尚不清楚。方法:根据之前注册的方案,系统搜索PubMed、Web of Science和Embase数据库,以确定截至2022年8月的相关文献。纳入了在接受静脉溶栓治疗的急性缺血性卒中患者中报告新CMBs的队列研究。随机效应模型用于计算合并估计。结果:荟萃分析包括7项研究,涉及1079名患者。合并的新CMBs患病率为7.6%(95%置信区间3.9-14.3%),63.6%的新CMB位于脑叶。与没有新的CMBs的患者相比,有新的CMBs的患者年龄更大,高血压比例更高,收缩压和基线CMBs负担更高。新CMBs的存在增加了远处脑出血(OR 28.75,95%CI 8.58-96.38)和症状性脑出血(OR15.49,95%CI 3.21-77.73)的可能性,但与功能结果或出血转化无关。结论:静脉溶栓后新的CMBs的发生率约为7.6%。新的CMB的存在与静脉溶栓后的远程症状性脑出血有关。考虑到CMBs进展的潜在长期不良影响,应根据潜在的风险因素确定新CMBs的高风险患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuroradiology
Clinical Neuroradiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuroradiology provides current information, original contributions, and reviews in the field of neuroradiology. An interdisciplinary approach is accomplished by diagnostic and therapeutic contributions related to associated subjects. The international coverage and relevance of the journal is underlined by its being the official journal of the German, Swiss, and Austrian Societies of Neuroradiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信