Tissue responses to everolimus-eluting stents implanted in severely calcified lesions following atherectomy.

IF 3.1 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Tomohiro Yamaguchi, Takanori Yamazaki, Hisako Yoshida, Kotaro Matsumoto, Ryosuke Yahiro, Kazuhiro Nakao, Yusuke Kure, Tsukasa Okai, Takenobu Shimada, Kenichiro Otsuka, Yasuhiro Izumiya, Daiju Fukuda
{"title":"Tissue responses to everolimus-eluting stents implanted in severely calcified lesions following atherectomy.","authors":"Tomohiro Yamaguchi, Takanori Yamazaki, Hisako Yoshida, Kotaro Matsumoto, Ryosuke Yahiro, Kazuhiro Nakao, Yusuke Kure, Tsukasa Okai, Takenobu Shimada, Kenichiro Otsuka, Yasuhiro Izumiya, Daiju Fukuda","doi":"10.1007/s12928-023-00965-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Histopathological examination has revealed that stents on severely calcified plaques were associated with delayed vascular healing. Although atherectomy devices can increase the number of malapposed struts, tissue responses to implanted drug eluting stents in atherectomy patients remain largely unknown. This retrospective observational study included 30 patients who underwent atherectomy and everolimus-eluting stent (EES) deployment for severely calcified coronary lesions (biodegradable polymer EES (BP-EES), n = 15; durable polymer EES (DP-EES), n  = 15). Optical coherence tomography was carried out at baseline and follow-up, and struts with acute stent malapposition (ASM) were categorized as struts on modified calcium (mod-Ca), non-modified calcium (non-mod-Ca), or non-calcium (non-Ca). Adequate vascular healing, defined as ASM resolution with neointimal coverage, was compared between the BP-EES and DP-EES groups. Multivariate linear regression analysis using a generalized estimated equation revealed that BP-EES use was associated with significantly better adequate vascular healing compared with DP-EES (odds ratio [OR]: 3.691, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.175-11.592, P = 0.025). adequate vascular healing was associated with the underlying plaque morphology (mod-Ca vs non-mod-Ca: OR 2.833, 95% CI 1.491-5.384, P = 0.001; non-Ca vs non-mod-Ca: OR 1.248, 95% CI 0.440-3.543, P = 0.677). This study demonstrates that drug-eluting stent selection and calcium modification are possible factors affecting vascular healing of malapposed struts in severely calcified lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9439,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10764536/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12928-023-00965-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Histopathological examination has revealed that stents on severely calcified plaques were associated with delayed vascular healing. Although atherectomy devices can increase the number of malapposed struts, tissue responses to implanted drug eluting stents in atherectomy patients remain largely unknown. This retrospective observational study included 30 patients who underwent atherectomy and everolimus-eluting stent (EES) deployment for severely calcified coronary lesions (biodegradable polymer EES (BP-EES), n = 15; durable polymer EES (DP-EES), n  = 15). Optical coherence tomography was carried out at baseline and follow-up, and struts with acute stent malapposition (ASM) were categorized as struts on modified calcium (mod-Ca), non-modified calcium (non-mod-Ca), or non-calcium (non-Ca). Adequate vascular healing, defined as ASM resolution with neointimal coverage, was compared between the BP-EES and DP-EES groups. Multivariate linear regression analysis using a generalized estimated equation revealed that BP-EES use was associated with significantly better adequate vascular healing compared with DP-EES (odds ratio [OR]: 3.691, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.175-11.592, P = 0.025). adequate vascular healing was associated with the underlying plaque morphology (mod-Ca vs non-mod-Ca: OR 2.833, 95% CI 1.491-5.384, P = 0.001; non-Ca vs non-mod-Ca: OR 1.248, 95% CI 0.440-3.543, P = 0.677). This study demonstrates that drug-eluting stent selection and calcium modification are possible factors affecting vascular healing of malapposed struts in severely calcified lesions.

动脉斑块切除术后严重钙化病变植入依维莫司洗脱支架的组织反应。
组织病理学检查显示,严重钙化斑块上的支架与血管愈合延迟有关。尽管斑块切除术装置会增加贴壁不良支柱的数量,但斑块切除术患者对植入药物洗脱支架的组织反应在很大程度上仍然未知。这项回顾性观察性研究包括30名患者,他们接受了动脉粥样硬化切除术和依维莫司洗脱支架(EES)部署治疗严重钙化的冠状动脉病变(可生物降解聚合物EES(BP-EES) = 15;耐用聚合物EES(DP-EES),n = 15) 。在基线和随访时进行光学相干断层扫描,将患有急性支架贴壁不良(ASM)的支柱分为修饰钙(mod-Ca)、非修饰钙(non-mod-Ca)或非钙(non-Ca)支柱。比较了BP-EES组和DP-EES组之间充分的血管愈合(定义为ASM消退和新生内膜覆盖)。使用广义估计方程的多元线性回归分析显示,与DP-EES相比,BP-EES的使用与明显更好的充分血管愈合相关(优势比[OR]:3.691,95%置信区间[CI]1.175-11.592,P = 0.025)。充分的血管愈合与潜在的斑块形态相关(mod Ca与非mod Ca:OR 2.833,95%CI 1.491-5.384,P = 0.001;非Ca与非mod Ca:OR 1.248,95%CI 0.440-3.543,P = 0.677)。本研究表明,药物洗脱支架的选择和钙修饰可能是影响严重钙化病变中贴壁不良支柱血管愈合的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics
Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics (CVIT) is an international journal covering the field of cardiovascular disease and includes cardiac (coronary and noncoronary) and peripheral interventions and therapeutics. Articles are subject to peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability. CVIT is an official journal of The Japanese Association of Cardiovascular Intervention and Therapeutics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信