Ecological relationships between coprophagous insects and livestock production: a review.

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY
Bulletin of Entomological Research Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-19 DOI:10.1017/S0007485323000494
Daiana V Perri, Octavio Bruzzone, Marcos H Easdale
{"title":"Ecological relationships between coprophagous insects and livestock production: a review.","authors":"Daiana V Perri, Octavio Bruzzone, Marcos H Easdale","doi":"10.1017/S0007485323000494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ecological function played by the coprophagous insects is an important issue in livestock production contexts. The role of this fauna, specially dung beetles, provides benefits to both rangelands and production performance. This interaction has been studied and reported in many scientific articles, in very different places and with diverse production contexts. However, a comprehensive review of the relationship between coprophagous insects and livestock production is still lacking. We reviewed the research studies on this topic during the past five decades, with a focus in Scarabaeidae taxon and livestock production, in order to identify further research priorities. We analysed 435 research articles. The main results were: (I) studies were mostly located in temperate broadleaf forest biome, whereas arid environments were less studied; (II) <i>Production practices impacts</i> category was the most studied, for which the effects produced by antiparasitic products on the coprophagous insects (<i>n</i> = 93; 21% of total revised articles) was the topics with major number of articles. Followed was <i>Biology</i> category (<i>n</i> = 69; 16%), then in <i>Ecosystem function</i> category the most frequent studies were on dung removal (<i>n</i> = 40; 9%), whereas in the <i>Ecosystem Services</i> category the most frequent studies were on biological control (<i>n</i> = 28; 6%); (III) Australia, Mexico, Brazil, and United States were the countries with most research articles. We identified some knowledge gaps on relevant ecological functions of this fauna, in relation to benefits to livestock production. There is a need for future research on nutrient cycling, bioturbation, effects on primary production and vegetation diversity.</p>","PeriodicalId":9370,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Entomological Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Entomological Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007485323000494","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The ecological function played by the coprophagous insects is an important issue in livestock production contexts. The role of this fauna, specially dung beetles, provides benefits to both rangelands and production performance. This interaction has been studied and reported in many scientific articles, in very different places and with diverse production contexts. However, a comprehensive review of the relationship between coprophagous insects and livestock production is still lacking. We reviewed the research studies on this topic during the past five decades, with a focus in Scarabaeidae taxon and livestock production, in order to identify further research priorities. We analysed 435 research articles. The main results were: (I) studies were mostly located in temperate broadleaf forest biome, whereas arid environments were less studied; (II) Production practices impacts category was the most studied, for which the effects produced by antiparasitic products on the coprophagous insects (n = 93; 21% of total revised articles) was the topics with major number of articles. Followed was Biology category (n = 69; 16%), then in Ecosystem function category the most frequent studies were on dung removal (n = 40; 9%), whereas in the Ecosystem Services category the most frequent studies were on biological control (n = 28; 6%); (III) Australia, Mexico, Brazil, and United States were the countries with most research articles. We identified some knowledge gaps on relevant ecological functions of this fauna, in relation to benefits to livestock production. There is a need for future research on nutrient cycling, bioturbation, effects on primary production and vegetation diversity.

食粪昆虫与畜牧生产之间的生态关系:综述。
食粪昆虫的生态功能是畜牧生产中的一个重要问题。这种动物群,特别是甲虫的作用,对牧场和生产性能都有好处。在许多科学文章中,在不同的地方和不同的生产环境中,对这种相互作用进行了研究和报道。然而,对食粪昆虫与畜牧业生产之间的关系仍缺乏全面的综述。我们回顾了过去五十年来关于这一主题的研究,重点是Scarabaidae分类单元和畜牧生产,以确定进一步的研究重点。我们分析了435篇研究文章。主要结果如下:(I)研究大多位于温带阔叶林生物群落中,而对干旱环境的研究较少;(II) 研究最多的是生产实践影响类别,其中抗寄生虫产品对食粪昆虫产生的影响(n=93;占修订文章总数的21%)是文章数量最多的主题。其次是生物学类别(n=69;16%),然后是生态系统功能类别中最频繁的研究是粪便清除(n=40;9%),而生态系统服务类别中最常见的研究是生物控制(n=28;6%);(III) 澳大利亚、墨西哥、巴西和美国是发表研究文章最多的国家。我们发现了一些关于该动物群的相关生态功能以及畜牧业生产效益的知识空白。未来需要研究营养循环、生物扰动、对初级生产的影响和植被多样性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1910, the internationally recognised Bulletin of Entomological Research aims to further global knowledge of entomology through the generalisation of research findings rather than providing more entomological exceptions. The Bulletin publishes high quality and original research papers, ''critiques'' and review articles concerning insects or other arthropods of economic importance in agriculture, forestry, stored products, biological control, medicine, animal health and natural resource management. The scope of papers addresses the biology, ecology, behaviour, physiology and systematics of individuals and populations, with a particular emphasis upon the major current and emerging pests of agriculture, horticulture and forestry, and vectors of human and animal diseases. This includes the interactions between species (plants, hosts for parasites, natural enemies and whole communities), novel methodological developments, including molecular biology, in an applied context. The Bulletin does not publish the results of pesticide testing or traditional taxonomic revisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信