Hearts and Minds: Emotion Recognition and Mentalizing in Parkinson's Disease and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy.

IF 2.1 4区心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology Pub Date : 2024-05-21 DOI:10.1093/arclin/acad081

Marina I Martins, Francisco E C Cardoso, Paulo Caramelli, Luciano I Mariano, Natalia P Rocha, Antônio Jaeger, Antônio L Teixeira, Vítor Tumas, Sarah T Camargos, Leonardo C de Souza

{"title":"Hearts and Minds: Emotion Recognition and Mentalizing in Parkinson's Disease and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy.","authors":"Marina I Martins, Francisco E C Cardoso, Paulo Caramelli, Luciano I Mariano, Natalia P Rocha, Antônio Jaeger, Antônio L Teixeira, Vítor Tumas, Sarah T Camargos, Leonardo C de Souza","doi":"10.1093/arclin/acad081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: There are scarce data comparing Parkinson's disease (PD) and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP) in social cognition (SC). We aimed to compare patients with PSP and PD in SC.Methods: We included three groups: PD (n = 18), PSP (n = 20) and controls (n = 23). Participants underwent neuropsychological exams, including the mini-version of the Social and Emotional Assessment, which is composed of the facial emotion recognition test (FERT) and the modified faux-pas (mFP) test, which assesses Theory of Mind (ToM).Results: Patients with PD scored lower than controls in the FERT, but not in the mFP test. Patients with PSP performed worse than controls in both the mFP and FERT. PD and PSP groups did not differ in the FERT, but PSP performed worse than PD in the mFP test. The mFP test distinguished PSP from PD with 89% accuracy.Conclusion: The assessment of ToM may contribute to the differentiation between PD and PSP.","PeriodicalId":8176,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"516-522"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acad081","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: There are scarce data comparing Parkinson's disease (PD) and Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP) in social cognition (SC). We aimed to compare patients with PSP and PD in SC.

Methods: We included three groups: PD (n = 18), PSP (n = 20) and controls (n = 23). Participants underwent neuropsychological exams, including the mini-version of the Social and Emotional Assessment, which is composed of the facial emotion recognition test (FERT) and the modified faux-pas (mFP) test, which assesses Theory of Mind (ToM).

Results: Patients with PD scored lower than controls in the FERT, but not in the mFP test. Patients with PSP performed worse than controls in both the mFP and FERT. PD and PSP groups did not differ in the FERT, but PSP performed worse than PD in the mFP test. The mFP test distinguished PSP from PD with 89% accuracy.

Conclusion: The assessment of ToM may contribute to the differentiation between PD and PSP.

查看原文本刊更多论文

心脏和心智：帕金森病和进行性上半月形麻痹的情绪识别和心理化。

目的：在社会认知（SC）方面，比较帕金森病（PD）和进行性心上麻痹（PSP）的资料很少。我们的目的是比较PSP和PD在SC中的患者。方法：我们包括三组：PD（n = 18），PSP（n = 20）和控制（n = 23）。参与者接受了神经心理学检查，包括由面部情绪识别测试（FERT）和评估心理理论（ToM）的修正失礼测试（mFP）组成的迷你版社会和情绪评估。结果：帕金森病患者在FERT中的得分低于对照组，但在mFP测试中没有。PSP患者在mFP和FERT方面的表现均低于对照组。PD组和PSP组在FERT方面没有差异，但PSP在mFP测试中的表现比PD差。mFP测试以89%的准确率区分PSP和PD。结论：ToM的评估有助于鉴别PD和PSP。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 医学-心理学

CiteScore

4.60

自引率

7.70%

发文量

358

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： The journal publishes original contributions dealing with psychological aspects of the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of disorders arising out of dysfunction of the central nervous system. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology will also consider manuscripts involving the established principles of the profession of neuropsychology: (a) delivery and evaluation of services, (b) ethical and legal issues, and (c) approaches to education and training. Preference will be given to empirical reports and key reviews. Brief research reports, case studies, and commentaries on published articles (not exceeding two printed pages) will also be considered. At the discretion of the editor, rebuttals to commentaries may be invited. Occasional papers of a theoretical nature will be considered.