Comparison of DNA Isolation Methods that Derived from Leaves of a Potential Anti-Cancer Rodent Tuber (Typhonium flagelliforme) Plant

Gemilang Rahmadara, N. F. Hanifah, R. Rismayanti, D. Purwoko, Andi Rochandi, T. Tajuddin
{"title":"Comparison of DNA Isolation Methods that Derived from Leaves of a Potential Anti-Cancer Rodent Tuber (Typhonium flagelliforme) Plant","authors":"Gemilang Rahmadara, N. F. Hanifah, R. Rismayanti, D. Purwoko, Andi Rochandi, T. Tajuddin","doi":"10.20956/ijas.v10i2.3966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The content of polysaccharides, polyphenols, proteins, and RNA compounds is the main problem often found in Plants DNA isolation, which inhibit the process of DNA isolation. Comparing the methods of plant DNA isolation is necessary for obtaining the DNA with good quality, purity, high concentration and efficiency time and cost. This study aimed to determine the best DNA isolation method that derived from leaves of a potential anti-cancer Rodent Tuber (Typhonium flagelliforme) plant by comparing the conventional DNA isolation method (cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide/CTAB) and 2 commercial kits (Promega Wizard™ Genomic DNA Purification Kits, and Geneaid Genomic Mini Kit). The results showed that the CTAB method yielded a higher amount of DNA (>100 ng/µL) at the cost of 0.49 USD per sample, in comparison with Promega method (69.19 to 157.68 ng/µL) at 3.28 USD per sample and Geneaid method (8.15 to 18.52 ng/µL) at 2.06 USD per sample. Based on the purity of isolated DNA (A260/280), CTAB method produced relatively similar DNA quality to Promega kit (1.8-2.0). On the other hand, Geneaid method resulted in a lower purity value at 1.15 to 1.60.","PeriodicalId":30744,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Agriculture System","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Agriculture System","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20956/ijas.v10i2.3966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The content of polysaccharides, polyphenols, proteins, and RNA compounds is the main problem often found in Plants DNA isolation, which inhibit the process of DNA isolation. Comparing the methods of plant DNA isolation is necessary for obtaining the DNA with good quality, purity, high concentration and efficiency time and cost. This study aimed to determine the best DNA isolation method that derived from leaves of a potential anti-cancer Rodent Tuber (Typhonium flagelliforme) plant by comparing the conventional DNA isolation method (cetyl trimethyl ammonium bromide/CTAB) and 2 commercial kits (Promega Wizard™ Genomic DNA Purification Kits, and Geneaid Genomic Mini Kit). The results showed that the CTAB method yielded a higher amount of DNA (>100 ng/µL) at the cost of 0.49 USD per sample, in comparison with Promega method (69.19 to 157.68 ng/µL) at 3.28 USD per sample and Geneaid method (8.15 to 18.52 ng/µL) at 2.06 USD per sample. Based on the purity of isolated DNA (A260/280), CTAB method produced relatively similar DNA quality to Promega kit (1.8-2.0). On the other hand, Geneaid method resulted in a lower purity value at 1.15 to 1.60.
一种潜在抗癌鼠块茎(斑蝥)植物叶片DNA分离方法的比较
多糖、多酚、蛋白质和RNA化合物的含量是植物DNA分离中经常发现的主要问题,它们抑制了DNA分离的过程。比较植物DNA的分离方法是获得质量好、纯度高、浓度高、效率高、时间和成本高的DNA所必需的。本研究旨在通过比较传统的DNA分离方法(十六烷基三甲基溴化铵/CTAB)和2种商业试剂盒(Promega Wizard™ 基因组DNA纯化试剂盒和Geneaid Genomic Mini试剂盒)。结果表明,与Promega方法(69.19至157.68纳克/µL)(3.28美元/样品)和Geneaid方法(8.15至18.52纳克/µL)(2.06美元/样品相比,CTAB方法以0.49美元/样品的成本产生更高量的DNA(>100纳克/µ升)。基于分离DNA的纯度(A260/280),CTAB法产生的DNA质量与Promega试剂盒(1.8-2.0)相对相似。另一方面,Geneaid法产生的纯度值较低,为1.15-1.60。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信