Digital Module 28: Unusual Things That Usually Occur in a Credentialing Testing Program

IF 2.7 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Richard A. Feinberg, Carol Morrison, Mark R. Raymond
{"title":"Digital Module 28: Unusual Things That Usually Occur in a Credentialing Testing Program","authors":"Richard A. Feinberg,&nbsp;Carol Morrison,&nbsp;Mark R. Raymond","doi":"10.1111/emip.12500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Formal graduate education in a measurement related field provides a solid foundation for professionals who work on credentialing examinations. Those foundational skills are then expanded and refined over time as practitioners encounter complex and nuanced challenges that were not covered by or go beyond the context described in textbooks. For instance, as most of us who work on operational testing programs are (sometimes) painfully aware, real data can be very messy. Often unanticipated situations arise that can create a range of problems from threats to score validity, to unexpected financial costs, and even longer-term reputational damage. In practice, solutions for these unanticipated situations are not always straightforward, often requiring a compromise between psychometric best practices, business resources, and needs of the customer. In this module we discuss some of these unusual challenges that usually occur in a credentialing program. First, we provide a high-level summary of the main components of the assessment lifecycle and the different roles within a testing organization. Next, we propose a framework for qualifying risk along with various considerations and potential actions for managing these challenges. Lastly, we integrate this information by presenting a few scenarios that can occur in practice that should help learners think though applicable team-based problem-solving and better align recommended action from a psychometric perspective given the context and magnitude of the challenge.</p>","PeriodicalId":47345,"journal":{"name":"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Measurement-Issues and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emip.12500","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Formal graduate education in a measurement related field provides a solid foundation for professionals who work on credentialing examinations. Those foundational skills are then expanded and refined over time as practitioners encounter complex and nuanced challenges that were not covered by or go beyond the context described in textbooks. For instance, as most of us who work on operational testing programs are (sometimes) painfully aware, real data can be very messy. Often unanticipated situations arise that can create a range of problems from threats to score validity, to unexpected financial costs, and even longer-term reputational damage. In practice, solutions for these unanticipated situations are not always straightforward, often requiring a compromise between psychometric best practices, business resources, and needs of the customer. In this module we discuss some of these unusual challenges that usually occur in a credentialing program. First, we provide a high-level summary of the main components of the assessment lifecycle and the different roles within a testing organization. Next, we propose a framework for qualifying risk along with various considerations and potential actions for managing these challenges. Lastly, we integrate this information by presenting a few scenarios that can occur in practice that should help learners think though applicable team-based problem-solving and better align recommended action from a psychometric perspective given the context and magnitude of the challenge.

数字模块28:在资格认证考试中经常发生的不寻常的事情
在测量相关领域的正式研究生教育为从事资格考试的专业人员提供了坚实的基础。随着时间的推移,当实践者遇到复杂而微妙的挑战时,这些基本技能会随着时间的推移而扩展和完善,这些挑战没有被教科书所涵盖或超出了教科书所描述的背景。例如,正如我们大多数从事操作测试程序的人(有时)痛苦地意识到的那样,真实的数据可能非常混乱。通常会出现意想不到的情况,这些情况可能会产生一系列问题,从威胁到评分有效性,到意外的财务成本,甚至是长期的声誉损害。在实践中,这些意外情况的解决方案并不总是直截了当的,通常需要在心理测量最佳实践、业务资源和客户需求之间做出妥协。在这个模块中,我们将讨论一些通常在认证项目中出现的不寻常的挑战。首先,我们提供了评估生命周期的主要组件和测试组织中的不同角色的高级摘要。接下来,我们提出了一个框架,用于确定风险,以及管理这些挑战的各种考虑因素和潜在行动。最后,我们通过展示一些可能在实践中发生的场景来整合这些信息,这些场景应该有助于学习者思考适用的基于团队的问题解决方案,并根据挑战的背景和规模,从心理测量学的角度更好地调整建议的行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.00%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信