Selection of Exterior Wall System and MCDM Derived Decision

Q1 Engineering
Anđelka Štilić, Igor Štilić
{"title":"Selection of Exterior Wall System and MCDM Derived Decision","authors":"Anđelka Štilić, Igor Štilić","doi":"10.47982/jfde.2022.1.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the field of construction practice, decisions regarding material selection frequently comedown to a choice based on tradition, i.e. recommendations based on the experience of theengineers hired by an employer as designers, contractors, or energy efficiency engineers.In the presented research, in addition to the Employer, technical individuals were involved inthe decision-making process. The harmonisation of Employer opinions and those of expertswere obtained through the NGT technique and Delphi based method, due to the fact that differentcriteria for a decision could represent a field of interest of an individual participant in theprocess. The result was determining the criteria, their strictness, and their weighted effect.As multi-criteria decision analysis has evolved into a powerful tool that assists decision-makersin generating \"a cut above\" choice in resolving specific cases and overcoming certain problemsin the architectural and construction industry, the use of the MCDM method EDAS+ in theresearch ensured an exterior wall system ranking that was not influenced by experience ormarketing.Without intending to favor any manufacturer of building materials, the research presents eightexterior wall systems belonging to different categories of core materials, all with individualfeatures, similarities, and differences.When compared to otherwise arbitrary estimates or recommendations based on experienceand the most commonly used building materials, the application of multi-criteria decisionanalysis in the case of exterior wall system selection for a particular 1938 Belgrade buildinggenerated more relevant selection results.","PeriodicalId":37451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Facade Design and Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Facade Design and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47982/jfde.2022.1.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In the field of construction practice, decisions regarding material selection frequently comedown to a choice based on tradition, i.e. recommendations based on the experience of theengineers hired by an employer as designers, contractors, or energy efficiency engineers.In the presented research, in addition to the Employer, technical individuals were involved inthe decision-making process. The harmonisation of Employer opinions and those of expertswere obtained through the NGT technique and Delphi based method, due to the fact that differentcriteria for a decision could represent a field of interest of an individual participant in theprocess. The result was determining the criteria, their strictness, and their weighted effect.As multi-criteria decision analysis has evolved into a powerful tool that assists decision-makersin generating "a cut above" choice in resolving specific cases and overcoming certain problemsin the architectural and construction industry, the use of the MCDM method EDAS+ in theresearch ensured an exterior wall system ranking that was not influenced by experience ormarketing.Without intending to favor any manufacturer of building materials, the research presents eightexterior wall systems belonging to different categories of core materials, all with individualfeatures, similarities, and differences.When compared to otherwise arbitrary estimates or recommendations based on experienceand the most commonly used building materials, the application of multi-criteria decisionanalysis in the case of exterior wall system selection for a particular 1938 Belgrade buildinggenerated more relevant selection results.
外墙系统的选择与MCDM的决策
在建筑实践领域,有关材料选择的决策经常演变为基于传统的选择,即基于雇主聘请的工程师(如设计师、承包商或能效工程师)的经验提出的建议。在所提出的研究中,除了雇主之外,技术人员也参与了决策过程。通过NGT技术和基于德尔福的方法,雇主的意见和专家的意见是一致的,因为决策的不同标准可能代表了过程中个人参与者感兴趣的领域。结果是确定了标准、它们的严格性和它们的加权效应。由于多标准决策分析已经发展成为一种强大的工具,可以帮助决策者在解决建筑和建筑行业的特定案例和克服某些问题时做出“超越”的选择,因此在研究中使用MCDM方法EDAS+确保了外墙系统排名不受经验或市场影响。在不偏袒任何建筑材料制造商的情况下,该研究提出了属于不同类别核心材料的八种外墙系统,它们都具有各自的特点、相似性和差异性。与基于经验和最常用建筑材料的任意估计或建议相比,在1938年贝尔格莱德建筑外墙系统选择中应用多准则决策分析产生了更相关的选择结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Facade Design and Engineering
Journal of Facade Design and Engineering Engineering-Architecture
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Facade Design and Engineering presents new research results and new proven practice in the field of facade design and engineering. The goal is to improve building technologies, as well as process management and architectural design. This journal is a valuable resource for professionals and academics involved in the design and engineering of building envelopes, including the following disciplines: Architecture Façade Engineering Climate Design Building Services Integration Building Physics Façade Design and Construction Management Novel Material Applications. The journal will be directed at the scientific community, but it will also feature papers that focus on the dissemination of science into practice and industrial innovations. In this way, readers explore the interaction between scientific developments, technical considerations and management issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信