Students' discourses on interprofessional collaboration in the context of Finnish early childhood education

IF 2 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Sanni Kahila, Tiina Kuutti, Johanna Heikka, Nina Sajaniemi
{"title":"Students' discourses on interprofessional collaboration in the context of Finnish early childhood education","authors":"Sanni Kahila,&nbsp;Tiina Kuutti,&nbsp;Johanna Heikka,&nbsp;Nina Sajaniemi","doi":"10.1016/j.lcsi.2023.100736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Around the world, the professionalism of early childhood education (ECE) has been under reform. In Finland, the administrative changes of recent years have raised the need to clarify and strengthen interprofessional collaboration among ECE professionals. This study examined ECE students' discourses of interprofessional collaboration in ECE teams and ECE professionals' differentiated expertise and competence. The data were collected by conducting focus group interviews (n = 17) for ECE teacher students (n = 20) and social pedagogue students (n = 9) as well as childcare students (n = 12). As a result, six discourses of interprofessional collaboration were identified: interprofessional collaboration as a prerequisite, secondary asset, unclear, causing inequality, impossibility, as well as a need for improvement. The discourses of expertise and competence, in turn, considered education-specific areas, differentiated pedagogical expertise and competence, and theory versus practice. The results reflect how ECE students create their understanding about their future profession surrounded by contradictory discourses. The study provides perspectives that can be utilised by working life and education programmes to support ECE professionals' professional development and improve the interprofessional collaboration in ECE teams.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46850,"journal":{"name":"Learning Culture and Social Interaction","volume":"41 ","pages":"Article 100736"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Culture and Social Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210656123000521","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Around the world, the professionalism of early childhood education (ECE) has been under reform. In Finland, the administrative changes of recent years have raised the need to clarify and strengthen interprofessional collaboration among ECE professionals. This study examined ECE students' discourses of interprofessional collaboration in ECE teams and ECE professionals' differentiated expertise and competence. The data were collected by conducting focus group interviews (n = 17) for ECE teacher students (n = 20) and social pedagogue students (n = 9) as well as childcare students (n = 12). As a result, six discourses of interprofessional collaboration were identified: interprofessional collaboration as a prerequisite, secondary asset, unclear, causing inequality, impossibility, as well as a need for improvement. The discourses of expertise and competence, in turn, considered education-specific areas, differentiated pedagogical expertise and competence, and theory versus practice. The results reflect how ECE students create their understanding about their future profession surrounded by contradictory discourses. The study provides perspectives that can be utilised by working life and education programmes to support ECE professionals' professional development and improve the interprofessional collaboration in ECE teams.

芬兰幼儿教育背景下的学生跨专业合作话语
在世界各地,幼儿教育的专业性一直在进行改革。在芬兰,近年来的行政改革提出了澄清和加强欧洲经委会专业人员之间跨专业合作的必要性。本研究考察了欧洲经委会学生对欧洲经委会团队跨专业合作的论述,以及欧洲经委会专业人员差异化的专业知识和能力。数据是通过对欧洲经委会师范生(n=20)、社会教育学学生(n=9)以及儿童保育学生(n=12)进行焦点小组访谈(n=17)收集的。因此,确定了六个关于跨专业合作的论述:跨专业合作是先决条件、次要资产、不明确、造成不平等、不可能以及需要改进。专业知识和能力的论述反过来又考虑了教育的特定领域,区分了教学专业知识和技能,以及理论与实践。研究结果反映了欧洲经委会学生如何在相互矛盾的话语中建立对未来职业的理解。该研究提供了一些观点,可供工作生活和教育计划使用,以支持欧洲经委会专业人员的专业发展,并改善欧洲经委会团队的跨专业合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Learning Culture and Social Interaction
Learning Culture and Social Interaction EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
50
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信