Ordinary Badness in Aristotelian Ethics: A Virtually Forgotten Question

Q4 Arts and Humanities
Carles José Mestre
{"title":"Ordinary Badness in Aristotelian Ethics: A Virtually Forgotten Question","authors":"Carles José Mestre","doi":"10.12775/szhf.2022.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we aim to show the way in which a kind of moral badness, what we call ordinary badness, could be understood from Aristotelian ethical writings. First, we document the recognition of this type of badness in the Aristotelian source, which is seen in his presentation of “hoi polloi” (the Many). In particular, it is shown that “hoi polloi” are “phauloi”, one of the (specific) predicates that Aristotle uses to refer to moral badness. Secondly, we highlight the methodological function of “hoi polloi” in the description of incontinence and self-indulgence, and we show how the Many could be considered as a new class within the question of moral effort. Finally, and related to the result of the previous analysis, we document what could be an aporia in the Aristotelian description of the population of the polis, which brings us to join Ian Morris in his global understanding of Aristotelian political philosophy.","PeriodicalId":32293,"journal":{"name":"Studia z Historii Filozofii","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia z Historii Filozofii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/szhf.2022.013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we aim to show the way in which a kind of moral badness, what we call ordinary badness, could be understood from Aristotelian ethical writings. First, we document the recognition of this type of badness in the Aristotelian source, which is seen in his presentation of “hoi polloi” (the Many). In particular, it is shown that “hoi polloi” are “phauloi”, one of the (specific) predicates that Aristotle uses to refer to moral badness. Secondly, we highlight the methodological function of “hoi polloi” in the description of incontinence and self-indulgence, and we show how the Many could be considered as a new class within the question of moral effort. Finally, and related to the result of the previous analysis, we document what could be an aporia in the Aristotelian description of the population of the polis, which brings us to join Ian Morris in his global understanding of Aristotelian political philosophy.
亚里士多德伦理学中的普通恶:一个几乎被遗忘的问题
在这篇文章中,我们的目的是展示一种道德上的恶,我们称之为普通的恶,可以从亚里士多德的伦理学著作中理解。首先,我们在亚里士多德的资料中记录了对这种类型的恶的认识,这可以在他对“hoi polloi”(the Many)的介绍中看到。特别是,它表明“hoi-polloi”是“phauloi”,亚里士多德用来指代道德败坏的(特定)谓词之一。其次,我们强调了“hoi-polloi”在描述失禁和自我放纵方面的方法论功能,并展示了在道德努力问题中,“许多人”是如何被视为一个新的阶层的。最后,与前面的分析结果相关,我们记录了亚里士多德对城邦人口的描述中可能存在的一个aporia,这使我们与Ian Morris一起对亚里士多德政治哲学进行了全球理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Studia z Historii Filozofii
Studia z Historii Filozofii Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书