How sustainable is sustainable intensification? Assessing yield gaps at field and farm level across the globe

IF 9.8 1区 经济学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
João Vasco Silva , Pytrik Reidsma , Frédéric Baudron , Alice G. Laborte , Ken E. Giller , Martin K. van Ittersum
{"title":"How sustainable is sustainable intensification? Assessing yield gaps at field and farm level across the globe","authors":"João Vasco Silva ,&nbsp;Pytrik Reidsma ,&nbsp;Frédéric Baudron ,&nbsp;Alice G. Laborte ,&nbsp;Ken E. Giller ,&nbsp;Martin K. van Ittersum","doi":"10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sustainable intensification has been proposed as a pathway to achieve food security and reduce environmental impacts of agriculture by focusing on narrowing yield gaps on existing agricultural land while improving resource use efficiencies. There is a general consensus that regions with large yield gaps can benefit most from sustainable intensification but it remains unclear how sustainable this is for farmers given their current resource constraints and livelihood strategies. Here, we draw upon three contrasting case studies, for which detailed data at field and farm levels were available for yield gap decomposition, to assess how sustainable intensification of crops (at field level) works out at farm level using environmental and socio-economic indicators. Although there is large potential for future intensification (<em>more output with more input</em>) of cereal production in southern Ethiopia, current input use in these farming systems is not economically and environmentally sustainable at farm level. The same is true for rice production in Central Luzon where sustainable intensification (<em>more output with less input</em>) can help to narrow yield gaps and improve N use efficiency (NUE) but it is not profitable due to the heavy reliance on costly hired labour. Trade-offs between yield gap closure and labour productivity were also observed in the aforementioned farming systems. Arable farms in the Netherlands exhibit small yield gaps as well as higher economic performance, NUE and N surplus compared to those observed in Southern Ethiopia and Central Luzon. For improving environmental sustainability, these farms require increases in resource-use efficiency and a reduction of the environmental impacts through a lower use of inputs (<em>same output with less input</em>). We conclude that public investments conducive for innovation and profitable farming are essential to make technologies accessible and affordable for farmers and to ensure that yield gaps can be narrowed and sustainability objectives served at the farm level.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48741,"journal":{"name":"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment","volume":"30 ","pages":"Article 100552"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.gfs.2021.100552","citationCount":"29","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Food Security-Agriculture Policy Economics and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211912421000614","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 29

Abstract

Sustainable intensification has been proposed as a pathway to achieve food security and reduce environmental impacts of agriculture by focusing on narrowing yield gaps on existing agricultural land while improving resource use efficiencies. There is a general consensus that regions with large yield gaps can benefit most from sustainable intensification but it remains unclear how sustainable this is for farmers given their current resource constraints and livelihood strategies. Here, we draw upon three contrasting case studies, for which detailed data at field and farm levels were available for yield gap decomposition, to assess how sustainable intensification of crops (at field level) works out at farm level using environmental and socio-economic indicators. Although there is large potential for future intensification (more output with more input) of cereal production in southern Ethiopia, current input use in these farming systems is not economically and environmentally sustainable at farm level. The same is true for rice production in Central Luzon where sustainable intensification (more output with less input) can help to narrow yield gaps and improve N use efficiency (NUE) but it is not profitable due to the heavy reliance on costly hired labour. Trade-offs between yield gap closure and labour productivity were also observed in the aforementioned farming systems. Arable farms in the Netherlands exhibit small yield gaps as well as higher economic performance, NUE and N surplus compared to those observed in Southern Ethiopia and Central Luzon. For improving environmental sustainability, these farms require increases in resource-use efficiency and a reduction of the environmental impacts through a lower use of inputs (same output with less input). We conclude that public investments conducive for innovation and profitable farming are essential to make technologies accessible and affordable for farmers and to ensure that yield gaps can be narrowed and sustainability objectives served at the farm level.

可持续集约化的可持续性如何?评估全球农田和农场层面的产量差距
可持续集约化已被提出作为实现粮食安全和减少农业对环境影响的途径,其重点是缩小现有农业用地的产量差距,同时提高资源利用效率。普遍的共识是,产量差距较大的地区可以从可持续集约化中获益最多,但考虑到目前的资源限制和生计战略,目前尚不清楚这种集约化对农民的可持续性有多大。在这里,我们借鉴了三个对比案例研究,其中田间和农场层面的详细数据可用于产量缺口分解,以评估作物(田间层面)的可持续集约化如何使用环境和社会经济指标在农场层面上发挥作用。尽管埃塞俄比亚南部的谷物生产在未来集约化(更多投入带来更多产出)方面有很大的潜力,但这些耕作系统目前的投入使用在农场层面上在经济和环境上是不可持续的。吕宋岛中部的水稻生产也是如此,那里的可持续集约化(投入少产出多)有助于缩小产量差距,提高氮素利用效率(NUE),但由于严重依赖昂贵的雇佣劳动力,这种做法无利可图。在上述农业系统中,也观察到产量差距缩小与劳动生产率之间的权衡。与埃塞俄比亚南部和吕宋岛中部相比,荷兰的耕地表现出较小的产量差距以及更高的经济效益、氮肥和氮肥盈余。为了改善环境的可持续性,这些农场需要提高资源利用效率,并通过减少投入(投入少产出相同)来减少对环境的影响。我们的结论是,有利于创新和盈利农业的公共投资对于使农民能够获得和负担得起技术、确保缩小产量差距和在农场层面实现可持续发展目标至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: Global Food Security plays a vital role in addressing food security challenges from local to global levels. To secure food systems, it emphasizes multifaceted actions considering technological, biophysical, institutional, economic, social, and political factors. The goal is to foster food systems that meet nutritional needs, preserve the environment, support livelihoods, tackle climate change, and diminish inequalities. This journal serves as a platform for researchers, policymakers, and practitioners to access and engage with recent, diverse research and perspectives on achieving sustainable food security globally. It aspires to be an internationally recognized resource presenting cutting-edge insights in an accessible manner to a broad audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信