Community Health Worker Interventions in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: Assessing the Feasibility and Effectiveness in Rural Central India

Q4 Medicine
V. Jain, R. Joshi, J. Idiculla, D. Xavier
{"title":"Community Health Worker Interventions in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients: Assessing the Feasibility and Effectiveness in Rural Central India","authors":"V. Jain, R. Joshi, J. Idiculla, D. Xavier","doi":"10.5530/JCDR.2018.3.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Globally, across high as well as low-income countries, there is a sub-optimal glycemic control amongst Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Communitybased programmes with the help of community health workers (CHWs) have been tried to offer culturally appropriate care leading to positive impact on glycemic control. Methods: We planned this open-label randomised controlled trial to assess the possibility of CHWs interventions in a rural community in central India. We designed this study to compare glycaemic control, lipid profile, blood pressure and anthropometric measurements between patients in the CHW intervention group and those in the standard therapy group. The intervention group was offered CHW interventions in the form of home visits, health education, patient diary, telephonic reminders etc as compared to standard care group that received usual care. Results: We included a total of 299 patients in our study (standard care group n= 146 and intervention group n= 153) and followed them for a period of 6 months (96.98% follow up data) and recorded outcome variables (fasting blood sugar, post-prandial blood sugar, glycosylated haemoglobin, lipid profile, blood pressure) at the start and end of the study. Both the standard care group and intervention group showed improved in their glycemic indices at the end of the study. We established no statistical difference between the intervention and the standard care group at the end of the study. The mean reduction of HbA1c and fasting blood sugar was more in the intervention group as compared to the standard care group. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated a trend towards improvement in glycemic indices in the intervention group as compared to the standard care group.","PeriodicalId":15222,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/JCDR.2018.3.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Background: Globally, across high as well as low-income countries, there is a sub-optimal glycemic control amongst Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients. Communitybased programmes with the help of community health workers (CHWs) have been tried to offer culturally appropriate care leading to positive impact on glycemic control. Methods: We planned this open-label randomised controlled trial to assess the possibility of CHWs interventions in a rural community in central India. We designed this study to compare glycaemic control, lipid profile, blood pressure and anthropometric measurements between patients in the CHW intervention group and those in the standard therapy group. The intervention group was offered CHW interventions in the form of home visits, health education, patient diary, telephonic reminders etc as compared to standard care group that received usual care. Results: We included a total of 299 patients in our study (standard care group n= 146 and intervention group n= 153) and followed them for a period of 6 months (96.98% follow up data) and recorded outcome variables (fasting blood sugar, post-prandial blood sugar, glycosylated haemoglobin, lipid profile, blood pressure) at the start and end of the study. Both the standard care group and intervention group showed improved in their glycemic indices at the end of the study. We established no statistical difference between the intervention and the standard care group at the end of the study. The mean reduction of HbA1c and fasting blood sugar was more in the intervention group as compared to the standard care group. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated a trend towards improvement in glycemic indices in the intervention group as compared to the standard care group.
社区卫生工作者对2型糖尿病患者的干预:评估印度中部农村的可行性和有效性
背景:在全球范围内,无论是高收入国家还是低收入国家,2型糖尿病患者的血糖控制都不理想。在社区卫生工作者(CHW)的帮助下,基于社区的计划已被尝试提供文化上合适的护理,从而对血糖控制产生积极影响。方法:我们计划进行这项开放标签随机对照试验,以评估CHW干预印度中部农村社区的可能性。我们设计了这项研究来比较CHW干预组和标准治疗组患者的血糖控制、血脂、血压和人体测量。与接受常规护理的标准护理组相比,干预组以家访、健康教育、患者日记、电话提醒等形式接受CHW干预。结果:我们的研究共纳入299名患者(标准护理组n=146,干预组n=153),对他们进行了6个月的随访(96.98%的随访数据),并记录了研究开始和结束时的结果变量(空腹血糖、餐后血糖、糖化血红蛋白、血脂、血压)。研究结束时,标准护理组和干预组的血糖指数均有所改善。在研究结束时,我们确定干预组和标准护理组之间没有统计学差异。与标准护理组相比,干预组的HbA1c和空腹血糖的平均下降幅度更大。结论:我们的研究表明,与标准护理组相比,干预组的血糖指数有改善的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信