Explaining the conceptual considerations of virtual university in medical education: a systematic review

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
S. Ahmady, A. Habibi, Zohreh Koshgoftar
{"title":"Explaining the conceptual considerations of virtual university in medical education: a systematic review","authors":"S. Ahmady, A. Habibi, Zohreh Koshgoftar","doi":"10.22317/jcms.v8i5.1253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Most of existing literature on the concept of virtual university of medical sciences have been collected in a non-systematic manner. This issue highlights the need to conduct research on virtual university-related topics through systematic research evidence and empirical evaluations. The aim of the present study is to investigate the real complexity and diversity of the concept of virtual university of medical sciences. Method: This was a systematic review with the BeHEMoTH approach and aimed to identify, review, analyze and integrate models, theories and frameworks related to the concept of virtual university of medical sciences. Eligible articles were searched in PubMed, ERIC, IEEE، ISI ،Scopus, Ecampus research unit from 2001 to 2022 using related keywords in three stages. Results: A total of 13 articles were finally identified according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Pedagogical, technology, managerial, educational design, technology implementation, and educational-administrative management components were referred to in 5, 5, 4, 7, 6 and 4 articles, respectively. Thematic analysis of the models was carried out in two theoretical dimensions (pedagogical component, managerial component and technological component) and operational dimension (educational design, administrative-educational management and technology implementation). Conclusion: The results of the present study emphasize the need to pay attention to these six components in the establishment and development of virtual universities of medical sciences. In order to improve the education process in virtual universities, the process quality evaluation framework can be used.","PeriodicalId":42860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Medical Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22317/jcms.v8i5.1253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Most of existing literature on the concept of virtual university of medical sciences have been collected in a non-systematic manner. This issue highlights the need to conduct research on virtual university-related topics through systematic research evidence and empirical evaluations. The aim of the present study is to investigate the real complexity and diversity of the concept of virtual university of medical sciences. Method: This was a systematic review with the BeHEMoTH approach and aimed to identify, review, analyze and integrate models, theories and frameworks related to the concept of virtual university of medical sciences. Eligible articles were searched in PubMed, ERIC, IEEE، ISI ،Scopus, Ecampus research unit from 2001 to 2022 using related keywords in three stages. Results: A total of 13 articles were finally identified according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Pedagogical, technology, managerial, educational design, technology implementation, and educational-administrative management components were referred to in 5, 5, 4, 7, 6 and 4 articles, respectively. Thematic analysis of the models was carried out in two theoretical dimensions (pedagogical component, managerial component and technological component) and operational dimension (educational design, administrative-educational management and technology implementation). Conclusion: The results of the present study emphasize the need to pay attention to these six components in the establishment and development of virtual universities of medical sciences. In order to improve the education process in virtual universities, the process quality evaluation framework can be used.
解读医学教育中虚拟大学的概念考量:系统综述
目的:现有关于虚拟医学大学概念的文献大多是以非系统的方式收集的。这一问题突出了通过系统的研究证据和实证评估对虚拟大学相关主题进行研究的必要性。本研究的目的是调查虚拟医学大学概念的真实复杂性和多样性。方法:采用BeHEMoTH方法进行系统综述,旨在识别、回顾、分析和整合与虚拟医学大学概念相关的模型、理论和框架。从2001年到2022年,在PubMed、ERIC、IEEE’ISI’Scopus、Ecampus研究单位使用相关关键词分三个阶段搜索符合条件的文章。结果:根据纳入和排除标准,最终共鉴定出13篇文章。第5、5、4、7、6和4篇文章分别提到了教育、技术、管理、教育设计、技术实施和教育行政管理组成部分。从两个理论层面(教学部分、管理部分和技术部分)和操作层面(教育设计、行政教育管理和技术实施)对这些模型进行了专题分析。结论:本研究的结果强调了在建立和发展虚拟医学大学时需要注意这六个组成部分。为了改善虚拟大学的教育过程,可以使用过程质量评估框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Contemporary Medical Sciences
Journal of Contemporary Medical Sciences MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信