Connectivity detection in application to spike-wave discharge study

Q3 Physics and Astronomy
A. Grishchenko, M. Sysoeva, T. M. Medvedeva, C. Rijn, B. Bezruchko, I. Sysoev
{"title":"Connectivity detection in application to spike-wave discharge study","authors":"A. Grishchenko, M. Sysoeva, T. M. Medvedeva, C. Rijn, B. Bezruchko, I. Sysoev","doi":"10.35470/2226-4116-2020-9-2-86-97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In our study, we compare three popular approaches to directed coupling analysis, in particular transfer entropy and two types of Granger causality, applied to real data from genetic absence epilepsy rats. We have chosen the channels for which the coupling architecture is already well known from previous studies. Recordings from 5 WAG/Rij rats of 8 hours duration with at least 28 spontaneous seizures of length not less than 6 s in each recording were studied. To test results for significance, surrogate signals based on series permutation technique were constructed. Connectivity development in time was investigated by considering six two-second intervals before, during and after the seizure. Our outcomes showed large differences between studied approaches, while all of them exploit the same general idea. Transfer entropy demonstrated the smallest number of significant couplings throughout all three considered measures, while the linear Granger causality showed the largest number of them. This indicates that transfer entropy is the most conservative measure and the least sensitive one. Its sensitivity is affected by insufficient series length. The linear Granger causality is likely to demonstrate insufficient specificity.","PeriodicalId":37674,"journal":{"name":"Cybernetics and Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cybernetics and Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35470/2226-4116-2020-9-2-86-97","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Physics and Astronomy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

In our study, we compare three popular approaches to directed coupling analysis, in particular transfer entropy and two types of Granger causality, applied to real data from genetic absence epilepsy rats. We have chosen the channels for which the coupling architecture is already well known from previous studies. Recordings from 5 WAG/Rij rats of 8 hours duration with at least 28 spontaneous seizures of length not less than 6 s in each recording were studied. To test results for significance, surrogate signals based on series permutation technique were constructed. Connectivity development in time was investigated by considering six two-second intervals before, during and after the seizure. Our outcomes showed large differences between studied approaches, while all of them exploit the same general idea. Transfer entropy demonstrated the smallest number of significant couplings throughout all three considered measures, while the linear Granger causality showed the largest number of them. This indicates that transfer entropy is the most conservative measure and the least sensitive one. Its sensitivity is affected by insufficient series length. The linear Granger causality is likely to demonstrate insufficient specificity.
连通性检测在棘波放电研究中的应用
在我们的研究中,我们比较了三种常用的定向耦合分析方法,特别是转移熵和两种类型的格兰杰因果关系,它们应用于遗传缺失癫痫大鼠的真实数据。我们已经从以前的研究中选择了耦合结构已知的通道。研究了5只持续8小时的WAG/Rij大鼠的记录,每次记录中至少有28次自发发作,每次发作时间不少于6秒。为了检验结果的显著性,构建了基于序列置换技术的替代信号。通过考虑癫痫发作前、发作期间和发作后6个2秒的间隔来研究时间上的连通性发展。我们的结果显示,所研究的方法之间存在很大差异,而所有方法都采用了相同的总体思想。在所有三个考虑的度量中,转移熵显示出最小数量的显著耦合,而线性Granger因果关系显示出最大数量的有效耦合。这表明转移熵是最保守的度量,也是最不敏感的度量。其灵敏度受到串联长度不足的影响。线性格兰杰因果关系可能显示出不充分的特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cybernetics and Physics
Cybernetics and Physics Chemical Engineering-Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The scope of the journal includes: -Nonlinear dynamics and control -Complexity and self-organization -Control of oscillations -Control of chaos and bifurcations -Control in thermodynamics -Control of flows and turbulence -Information Physics -Cyber-physical systems -Modeling and identification of physical systems -Quantum information and control -Analysis and control of complex networks -Synchronization of systems and networks -Control of mechanical and micromechanical systems -Dynamics and control of plasma, beams, lasers, nanostructures -Applications of cybernetic methods in chemistry, biology, other natural sciences The papers in cybernetics with physical flavor as well as the papers in physics with cybernetic flavor are welcome. Cybernetics is assumed to include, in addition to control, such areas as estimation, filtering, optimization, identification, information theory, pattern recognition and other related areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信