Physicians' Perceptions of the Registered Dietitian Are Evolving

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Rachele Pojednic, D. Gale, M. McFarland, K. Prelack
{"title":"Physicians' Perceptions of the Registered Dietitian Are Evolving","authors":"Rachele Pojednic, D. Gale, M. McFarland, K. Prelack","doi":"10.1097/TIN.0000000000000255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Physicians' perceptions of registered dietitians (RDs), specifically regarding order writing privileges (OWPs), are relatively unknown. A survey containing questions about demographics, RD competency, roles, and importance of nutrition care was administered to 109 physicians from a large hospital network caring for pediatric patients. Results were determined by t tests and analysis of variance. Physicians believed RDs are most responsible for nutrition education/counseling and least for food service. Those who strongly agreed with the importance of providing nutrition care were more likely to perceive RDs as responsible for that care. Physicians who perceived RDs should initiate diet orders reported higher perceptions regarding systemic effects of granting OWPs.","PeriodicalId":48681,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Clinical Nutrition","volume":"36 1","pages":"213 - 223"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Clinical Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TIN.0000000000000255","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Physicians' perceptions of registered dietitians (RDs), specifically regarding order writing privileges (OWPs), are relatively unknown. A survey containing questions about demographics, RD competency, roles, and importance of nutrition care was administered to 109 physicians from a large hospital network caring for pediatric patients. Results were determined by t tests and analysis of variance. Physicians believed RDs are most responsible for nutrition education/counseling and least for food service. Those who strongly agreed with the importance of providing nutrition care were more likely to perceive RDs as responsible for that care. Physicians who perceived RDs should initiate diet orders reported higher perceptions regarding systemic effects of granting OWPs.
医生对注册营养师的看法正在演变
医生对注册营养师(RD)的看法,特别是对订单撰写特权(OWP)的看法相对未知。一项包含人口统计、RD能力、角色和营养护理重要性问题的调查对来自一家大型医院网络的109名医生进行,该网络负责照顾儿科患者。结果通过t检验和方差分析确定。医生们认为,RD对营养教育/咨询的责任最大,对食品服务的责任最小。那些强烈同意提供营养护理重要性的人更有可能认为RD负责提供营养护理。认为RD应该开始节食的医生报告说,他们对给予OWP的系统影响有更高的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Topics in Clinical Nutrition
Topics in Clinical Nutrition NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
20.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: ​​Topics in Clinical Nutrition (TICN) is a peer-reviewed, quarterly journal designed as a resource for the continuing education and clinical practice of dietitians and nutritionists. Each issue addresses topics of interest primarily to dietitians and nutritionists, students and interns in professional training programs and other health care personnel involved in the nutritional care of patients. Articles include translational research reports (work that applies new knowledge to practical effect), practice projects, evidence-based literature reviews, case studies and book reviews, and articles that highlight education theory and applied research which share the tools and techniques of nutrition and dietetics education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书