Unmet need for a holistic approach to insomnia diagnosis – a review of current tools in practice

Kamalesh Chakravarty , Sucharita Ray , Garima Shukla
{"title":"Unmet need for a holistic approach to insomnia diagnosis – a review of current tools in practice","authors":"Kamalesh Chakravarty ,&nbsp;Sucharita Ray ,&nbsp;Garima Shukla","doi":"10.1016/j.sleepe.2022.100055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Insomnia is a very common and yet challenging condition encountered in clinical practice. Clinical evaluation, often with the help of questionnaires is used to diagnose and quantify this condition. However, the questionnaires are highly heterogeneous in their scope and outlook and give varying information on different aspects of insomnia. Research questionnaires on insomnia abound in clinical literature but are not useful in the clinical setting to help in therapeutic decision-making. This paper is a review of the scope and limitations of some of the commonly used questionnaires in the diagnosis and evaluation of insomnia in the clinical setting.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A thorough literature search of studies evaluating diagnosis and evaluation of insomnia were included. The studies were selected on basis of their utility in clinical settings and the quality of the research reporting the results of their use. The usefulness and scope of the questionnaire and voids in their utility were discussed. Out of a total of 3872 articles, a final of 11 studies were taken up for final study as per the guidelines of reporting of systematic reviews PRISMA statement, 2020.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The included articles showed great heterogeneity in their scope as well as outcome measures. The older studies were of low methodological quality and limited clinical utility. Administration in a clinical setting was difficult for many while scoring questionnaires was complex and cumbersome.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>There is an unmet need for a holistic and easily administrable assessment measure of insomnia remains.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74809,"journal":{"name":"Sleep epidemiology","volume":"3 ","pages":"Article 100055"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667343622000361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Insomnia is a very common and yet challenging condition encountered in clinical practice. Clinical evaluation, often with the help of questionnaires is used to diagnose and quantify this condition. However, the questionnaires are highly heterogeneous in their scope and outlook and give varying information on different aspects of insomnia. Research questionnaires on insomnia abound in clinical literature but are not useful in the clinical setting to help in therapeutic decision-making. This paper is a review of the scope and limitations of some of the commonly used questionnaires in the diagnosis and evaluation of insomnia in the clinical setting.

Methods

A thorough literature search of studies evaluating diagnosis and evaluation of insomnia were included. The studies were selected on basis of their utility in clinical settings and the quality of the research reporting the results of their use. The usefulness and scope of the questionnaire and voids in their utility were discussed. Out of a total of 3872 articles, a final of 11 studies were taken up for final study as per the guidelines of reporting of systematic reviews PRISMA statement, 2020.

Results

The included articles showed great heterogeneity in their scope as well as outcome measures. The older studies were of low methodological quality and limited clinical utility. Administration in a clinical setting was difficult for many while scoring questionnaires was complex and cumbersome.

Conclusion

There is an unmet need for a holistic and easily administrable assessment measure of insomnia remains.

对失眠诊断的整体方法的迫切需要——对当前实践工具的回顾
背景失眠是临床实践中遇到的一种非常常见但具有挑战性的情况。临床评估通常在问卷的帮助下用于诊断和量化这种情况。然而,调查问卷在范围和前景上高度异质,在失眠的不同方面提供了不同的信息。临床文献中有大量关于失眠的研究问卷,但在临床环境中对帮助做出治疗决策没有用处。本文综述了临床环境中失眠诊断和评估中常用的一些问卷的范围和局限性。方法对失眠的诊断和评估研究进行全面的文献检索。这些研究是根据它们在临床环境中的效用和报告使用结果的研究质量来选择的。讨论了调查表的有用性和范围,以及其实用性方面的空白。在总共3872篇文章中,根据系统综述报告指南PRISMA声明,2020,共有11项研究被纳入最终研究。结果纳入的文章在范围和结果测量方面表现出巨大的异质性。较老的研究方法学质量低,临床实用性有限。对许多人来说,在临床环境中进行管理是困难的,而评分问卷则复杂而繁琐。结论对失眠的全面且易于管理的评估方法的需求尚未得到满足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sleep epidemiology
Sleep epidemiology Dentistry, Oral Surgery and Medicine, Clinical Neurology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信