Ethnonationalist Gender Norms: How Parties Shape Voter Attitudes toward Female Candidates in India

IF 5 1区 社会学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Anjali Thomas, Sayan Banerjee, Charles Hankla, Arindam Banerjee
{"title":"Ethnonationalist Gender Norms: How Parties Shape Voter Attitudes toward Female Candidates in India","authors":"Anjali Thomas,&nbsp;Sayan Banerjee,&nbsp;Charles Hankla,&nbsp;Arindam Banerjee","doi":"10.1111/ajps.12788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>How do parties in multiethnic societies shape voter attitudes toward female candidates? We address this question, focusing on parties with ideologies that contain ethnonationalist gender norms—patriarchal norms applied to women from an ethnonationalist party's core ethnic constituency. We argue that, while these norms appeal to an ethnonationalist party's base, they also provide informational cues to the party's “non-core” voters that undermine their support for the party's “core” female candidates. Evidence from an original conjoint survey experiment in the Indian state of Bihar supports our argument; upper-caste female candidates suffer a support penalty when they are affiliated with the national ruling party, whose ideology prescribes ethnonationalist gender norms targeting its core Hindu upper-caste constituency. This penalty, we show, is driven by the party's non-core voters. Our results, which we further bolster using real-world electoral data, illuminate when and how ethnonationalist gender norms disadvantage elite female candidates.</p>","PeriodicalId":48447,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Political Science","volume":"68 3","pages":"1057-1074"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Political Science","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajps.12788","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

How do parties in multiethnic societies shape voter attitudes toward female candidates? We address this question, focusing on parties with ideologies that contain ethnonationalist gender norms—patriarchal norms applied to women from an ethnonationalist party's core ethnic constituency. We argue that, while these norms appeal to an ethnonationalist party's base, they also provide informational cues to the party's “non-core” voters that undermine their support for the party's “core” female candidates. Evidence from an original conjoint survey experiment in the Indian state of Bihar supports our argument; upper-caste female candidates suffer a support penalty when they are affiliated with the national ruling party, whose ideology prescribes ethnonationalist gender norms targeting its core Hindu upper-caste constituency. This penalty, we show, is driven by the party's non-core voters. Our results, which we further bolster using real-world electoral data, illuminate when and how ethnonationalist gender norms disadvantage elite female candidates.

非民族主义性别规范:政党如何塑造印度选民对女性候选人的态度
多民族社会中的政党如何塑造选民对女性候选人的态度?我们探讨了这一问题,重点关注那些意识形态中包含民族主义性别规范--适用于来自民族主义政党核心民族选区的女性的宗法规范--的政党。我们认为,这些规范在吸引民族主义政党基础选民的同时,也为该党的 "非核心 "选民提供了信息线索,削弱了他们对该党 "核心 "女性候选人的支持。在印度比哈尔邦进行的一项原创联合调查实验的证据支持了我们的论点:当上层种姓女性候选人隶属于国家执政党时,她们的支持率会受到惩罚,因为该党的意识形态规定了针对其核心印度教上层种姓选民的民族主义性别规范。我们的研究表明,这种惩罚是由该党的非核心选民驱动的。我们利用现实世界的选举数据进一步证实了我们的结果,这些结果阐明了民族主义性别规范何时以及如何使精英女性候选人处于不利地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Political Science (AJPS) publishes research in all major areas of political science including American politics, public policy, international relations, comparative politics, political methodology, and political theory. Founded in 1956, the AJPS publishes articles that make outstanding contributions to scholarly knowledge about notable theoretical concerns, puzzles or controversies in any subfield of political science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信