Determinants of Public Opinion Toward Gender-Affirming Surgery in the United States.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q1 Social Sciences
Transgender Health Pub Date : 2024-06-17 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1089/trgh.2022.0119
Jackson S Burton, Kristin Pfeifauf, Gary B Skolnick, Justin M Sacks, Alison K Snyder-Warwick
{"title":"Determinants of Public Opinion Toward Gender-Affirming Surgery in the United States.","authors":"Jackson S Burton, Kristin Pfeifauf, Gary B Skolnick, Justin M Sacks, Alison K Snyder-Warwick","doi":"10.1089/trgh.2022.0119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>National polling data indicate that Americans support the right of transgender persons to undergo gender-affirming surgery (GAS). It remains unknown whether public perceptions of GAS differ depending on patient subpopulations, anatomical site, or insurance coverage and whether the public widely believes that transgender people will regret GAS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We built a Qualtrics™ survey derived from an online validated 2017 Ipsos survey and distributed it to American adults through Amazon Mechanical Turk. Associations of demographic characteristics with perception of GAS were determined using multinomial logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents (<i>n</i>=312) were predominantly non-Hispanic White (69.2%), held a bachelor's degree (64.7%), and reported an annual income of $25,000 to $74,999 (64.4%). Approximately half of respondents identified as socially liberal (50.3%); 34.0% as socially conservative; and 15.7% as neither. Respondents supported a right to GAS independent of anatomy and insurance. Support for transgender children (62%) was less than for adult transgender men (84%) and women (83%). Despite supporting a right to GAS, respondents agreed that transgender adults (67%) and children (74%) would regret GAS. Education was the strongest predictor of support for GAS rights. Socially conservative respondents were significantly more likely than nonideological or liberal respondents to believe that transgender people would regret GAS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This large online sample of American adults with diverse ideologies demonstrated support for GAS independent of anatomical site and insurance. Support of GAS for transgender children is robust, although lower than support for adults. Despite broad support, most laypersons believe that transgender people would regret GAS.</p>","PeriodicalId":37265,"journal":{"name":"Transgender Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11299100/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transgender Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/trgh.2022.0119","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: National polling data indicate that Americans support the right of transgender persons to undergo gender-affirming surgery (GAS). It remains unknown whether public perceptions of GAS differ depending on patient subpopulations, anatomical site, or insurance coverage and whether the public widely believes that transgender people will regret GAS.

Methods: We built a Qualtrics™ survey derived from an online validated 2017 Ipsos survey and distributed it to American adults through Amazon Mechanical Turk. Associations of demographic characteristics with perception of GAS were determined using multinomial logistic regression.

Results: Respondents (n=312) were predominantly non-Hispanic White (69.2%), held a bachelor's degree (64.7%), and reported an annual income of $25,000 to $74,999 (64.4%). Approximately half of respondents identified as socially liberal (50.3%); 34.0% as socially conservative; and 15.7% as neither. Respondents supported a right to GAS independent of anatomy and insurance. Support for transgender children (62%) was less than for adult transgender men (84%) and women (83%). Despite supporting a right to GAS, respondents agreed that transgender adults (67%) and children (74%) would regret GAS. Education was the strongest predictor of support for GAS rights. Socially conservative respondents were significantly more likely than nonideological or liberal respondents to believe that transgender people would regret GAS.

Conclusion: This large online sample of American adults with diverse ideologies demonstrated support for GAS independent of anatomical site and insurance. Support of GAS for transgender children is robust, although lower than support for adults. Despite broad support, most laypersons believe that transgender people would regret GAS.

美国对性别确认手术的舆论决定因素
目的:全国民意调查数据显示,美国人支持变性人接受性别确认手术(GAS)的权利。公众对 GAS 的看法是否会因患者亚群、解剖部位或保险范围的不同而有所差异,以及公众是否普遍认为变性人会对 GAS 感到后悔,这些仍是未知数:我们建立了一个Qualtrics™调查,该调查源于2017年益普索的一项在线验证调查,并通过亚马逊Mechanical Turk向美国成年人发放。采用多项式逻辑回归法确定人口统计学特征与 GAS 感知之间的关联:受访者(n=312)主要为非西班牙裔白人(69.2%),拥有学士学位(64.7%),年收入在 25,000 美元至 74,999 美元之间(64.4%)。大约一半的受访者认为自己是社会自由派(50.3%);34.0%认为自己是社会保守派;15.7%认为自己既不是社会自由派也不是社会保守派。受访者支持独立于解剖学和保险之外的 GAS 权利。变性儿童(62%)的支持率低于成年变性男性(84%)和女性(83%)。尽管受访者支持获得 GAS 的权利,但他们也认为成人变性者(67%)和儿童变性者(74%)会对 GAS 感到遗憾。受教育程度是影响受访者是否支持 GAS 权利的最主要因素。与非意识形态或自由派受访者相比,社会保守派受访者更有可能认为变性人会对 GAS 感到后悔:这个大型的美国成年人在线样本具有不同的意识形态,他们对 GAS 的支持与解剖部位和保险无关。变性儿童对 GAS 的支持率很高,但低于对成人的支持率。尽管获得了广泛支持,但大多数普通人认为变性人会对 GAS 感到后悔。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transgender Health
Transgender Health Social Sciences-Gender Studies
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.00%
发文量
122
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信