Online collaborative note-taking and discussion forums in flipped learning environments

IF 3.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Mik Fanguy, J. Costley, N. Almusharraf, Asma Almusharraf
{"title":"Online collaborative note-taking and discussion forums in flipped learning environments","authors":"Mik Fanguy, J. Costley, N. Almusharraf, Asma Almusharraf","doi":"10.14742/ajet.8580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the number of students learning in online and flipped contexts grows, an important question arises: to what extent is it necessary to have places or activities where students interact regarding course content? The present paper looked at three flipped learning environments: one with no online collaboration, one featuring an online discussion forum and one involving online collaborative note-taking. The subjects (N = 178) were all graduate students taking a flipped version of an English scientific writing class at a university in South Korea. The results show that students in the experimental conditions with online collaboration (collaborative note-taking and discussion forums) outperformed peers in the control condition (no online collaboration) on individual writing assignments. Furthermore, there was a benefit in the experimental condition with discussion forums regarding students’ group writing scores compared to the control group. These results show the value of implementing online student-to-student collaboration in flipped learning contexts and that both modes of collaboration tested herein add value to students’ learning.\nImplications for practice or policy:\n\nIncorporating online collaborative learning activities improves performance in flipped courses.\nUsing collaborative forums and collaborative note-taking provide similar benefits. and their implementation will improve the online portion of a flipped class.\nFlipped classes generally include an online lecture component but should also feature online collaboration as well.\n","PeriodicalId":47812,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8580","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the number of students learning in online and flipped contexts grows, an important question arises: to what extent is it necessary to have places or activities where students interact regarding course content? The present paper looked at three flipped learning environments: one with no online collaboration, one featuring an online discussion forum and one involving online collaborative note-taking. The subjects (N = 178) were all graduate students taking a flipped version of an English scientific writing class at a university in South Korea. The results show that students in the experimental conditions with online collaboration (collaborative note-taking and discussion forums) outperformed peers in the control condition (no online collaboration) on individual writing assignments. Furthermore, there was a benefit in the experimental condition with discussion forums regarding students’ group writing scores compared to the control group. These results show the value of implementing online student-to-student collaboration in flipped learning contexts and that both modes of collaboration tested herein add value to students’ learning. Implications for practice or policy: Incorporating online collaborative learning activities improves performance in flipped courses. Using collaborative forums and collaborative note-taking provide similar benefits. and their implementation will improve the online portion of a flipped class. Flipped classes generally include an online lecture component but should also feature online collaboration as well.
翻转学习环境中的在线协作笔记和讨论论坛
随着在网上和翻转环境中学习的学生人数的增加,一个重要的问题出现了:在多大程度上有必要让学生就课程内容进行互动?本文研究了三种翻转学习环境:一种没有在线协作,一种以在线讨论论坛为特色,另一种涉及在线协作笔记。受试者(N=178)都是在韩国一所大学上英语科学写作课的研究生。结果表明,在有在线协作(协作笔记和讨论论坛)的实验条件下,学生在个人写作作业上的表现优于对照条件(无在线协作)下的同龄人。此外,与对照组相比,在实验条件下,讨论论坛对学生的集体写作成绩也有好处。这些结果表明了在翻转学习环境中实现在线学生对学生协作的价值,并且本文测试的两种协作模式都为学生的学习增加了价值。对实践或政策的影响:纳入在线协作学习活动可以提高翻转课程的表现。使用协作论坛和协作笔记也有类似的好处。并且它们的实现将改善翻转课堂的在线部分。翻转课程通常包括在线讲座部分,但也应以在线协作为特色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
36 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信