The Need for Mandatory Academic Laboratory Sustainability Training – A Fume Cupboard Case Study

Rabbab Oun, David Charles, Alaine Martin, Roddy Yarr, Molly Huq, D. Drobot
{"title":"The Need for Mandatory Academic Laboratory Sustainability Training – A Fume Cupboard Case Study","authors":"Rabbab Oun, David Charles, Alaine Martin, Roddy Yarr, Molly Huq, D. Drobot","doi":"10.5539/jsd.v16n2p63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While scientific research is paramount to understanding the solar system, ecosystem, human disease and cures (etc) it continues to contribute to human-caused climate change. Scientists are becoming increasingly aware of the carbon footprint associated with their research and recognise the need to work more efficiently with their resource use and laboratory operations. \n \nUniversity laboratories are spaces that allow for research to be carried out safely, however, they consume five times more energy per square meter than office buildings. Fume cupboards are amongst the most energy intensive equipment and thus are a dominant factor when working towards creating safer and greener laboratories. In this paper, we report on the gas, electricity, carbon and financial savings derived by upgrading 105 constant air volume fume cupboards to variable air volume systems. We also report on the frequency of fume cupboard use by research staff, postgraduate students, and their overall understanding of fume cupboard best practice operations. The results reflect that while savings were achieved, they were lower than predicted. A factor to this may be poor student and staff understanding of how fume cupboards work resulting in their incorrect usage, therefore hampering sustainable progression. This study highlights that a major gap exists between laboratory technical upgrades and researcher awareness of proper and safe equipment use and operation. To overcome this, we propose that in addition to health and safety training, mandatory laboratory sustainability operations training should be provided to all laboratory users.","PeriodicalId":91562,"journal":{"name":"Journal of sustainable development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of sustainable development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v16n2p63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While scientific research is paramount to understanding the solar system, ecosystem, human disease and cures (etc) it continues to contribute to human-caused climate change. Scientists are becoming increasingly aware of the carbon footprint associated with their research and recognise the need to work more efficiently with their resource use and laboratory operations. University laboratories are spaces that allow for research to be carried out safely, however, they consume five times more energy per square meter than office buildings. Fume cupboards are amongst the most energy intensive equipment and thus are a dominant factor when working towards creating safer and greener laboratories. In this paper, we report on the gas, electricity, carbon and financial savings derived by upgrading 105 constant air volume fume cupboards to variable air volume systems. We also report on the frequency of fume cupboard use by research staff, postgraduate students, and their overall understanding of fume cupboard best practice operations. The results reflect that while savings were achieved, they were lower than predicted. A factor to this may be poor student and staff understanding of how fume cupboards work resulting in their incorrect usage, therefore hampering sustainable progression. This study highlights that a major gap exists between laboratory technical upgrades and researcher awareness of proper and safe equipment use and operation. To overcome this, we propose that in addition to health and safety training, mandatory laboratory sustainability operations training should be provided to all laboratory users.
强制性学术实验室可持续性培训的必要性——烟雾橱柜案例研究
虽然科学研究对于了解太阳系、生态系统、人类疾病和治疗方法等至关重要,但它仍在加剧人类造成的气候变化。科学家们越来越意识到与他们的研究相关的碳足迹,并认识到需要更有效地利用资源和实验室运作。大学实验室是允许安全进行研究的空间,然而,它们每平方米消耗的能源是办公楼的五倍。烟橱柜是最耗能的设备之一,因此在致力于创建更安全、更环保的实验室时是一个主要因素。在本文中,我们报告了将105个定风量通风柜升级为可变风量系统所节省的燃气、电力、碳和财务费用。我们还报告了研究人员、研究生使用通风柜的频率,以及他们对通风柜最佳实践操作的总体理解。结果表明,虽然实现了节约,但低于预测。造成这种情况的一个因素可能是学生和工作人员对通风柜的工作原理了解不足,导致其使用不当,从而阻碍了可持续发展。这项研究强调,实验室技术升级与研究人员对正确和安全的设备使用和操作的认识之间存在重大差距。为了克服这一问题,我们建议,除了健康和安全培训外,还应向所有实验室用户提供强制性的实验室可持续性操作培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书