Comparative study on metal versus zirconium dioxide infrastructure manufacturing in prosthetic rehabilitation in the maxillary frontal zone

Q4 Medicine
S. Drafta, V. Perieanu, R. Costea, O. Eftene, M. Burlibașa, Raluca Maria Manea, Florentina Caministeanu, Mircea Carabela, ioana-Cristina neagoe, Raluca Costea, I. Beuran, N. Măru
{"title":"Comparative study on metal versus zirconium dioxide infrastructure manufacturing in prosthetic rehabilitation in the maxillary frontal zone","authors":"S. Drafta, V. Perieanu, R. Costea, O. Eftene, M. Burlibașa, Raluca Maria Manea, Florentina Caministeanu, Mircea Carabela, ioana-Cristina neagoe, Raluca Costea, I. Beuran, N. Măru","doi":"10.37897/rjmp.2022.3.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prosthetic rehabilitation of the maxillary front teeth is an extremely laborious problem for the dental team, consisting of the dentist and the dental technician. If for the physiognomic component the most recommended materials are the ceramic masses, for the resistance substrate there are several variants. Conventional technologies using dental alloys and modern ones involving the use of zirconium dioxide can be used successfully in performing fixed prosthetic restorations in the maxillary frontal area, both options having both advantages and disadvantages, as we will describe in this material.","PeriodicalId":55841,"journal":{"name":"Practica Medicala","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Practica Medicala","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37897/rjmp.2022.3.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prosthetic rehabilitation of the maxillary front teeth is an extremely laborious problem for the dental team, consisting of the dentist and the dental technician. If for the physiognomic component the most recommended materials are the ceramic masses, for the resistance substrate there are several variants. Conventional technologies using dental alloys and modern ones involving the use of zirconium dioxide can be used successfully in performing fixed prosthetic restorations in the maxillary frontal area, both options having both advantages and disadvantages, as we will describe in this material.
金属与二氧化锆基础设施制造在上颌额骨修复中的比较研究
对于由牙医和牙科技师组成的牙科团队来说,上颌前牙的修复是一个极其艰巨的问题。如果对于外观部件,最推荐的材料是陶瓷块,那么对于电阻基底,则有几种变体。使用牙科合金的传统技术和使用二氧化锆的现代技术可以成功地用于在上颌额骨区域进行固定修复,这两种选择都有优点和缺点,正如我们将在本材料中描述的那样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书