OBJECTS IN SEARCH FOR INTERPRETATION: A Review of ANNA BIGELOW (ed.), ISLAM THROUGH OBJECTS. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2021, 264 pp.

Q3 Social Sciences
Gleb Stukalin
{"title":"OBJECTS IN SEARCH FOR INTERPRETATION: A Review of ANNA BIGELOW (ed.), ISLAM THROUGH OBJECTS. New York: Bloomsbury Academic, 2021, 264 pp.","authors":"Gleb Stukalin","doi":"10.31250/1815-8870-2022-18-55-342-354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The new collection, edited by Anna Bigelow, expands the methodology of the material approach to religion through the authors’ close look at various aspects of Muslim life. Under the cover one can find articles by researchers of substantial expertise in their fields. Each article represents a statement on a separate topic (be it history, architecture, numismatics, art history, environmental studies, etc.). The works highlight both examples from the very heart of the Muslim world (Mecca), as well as cases that are considered to be peripheral or even marginal (historic Granada, Upper Volta, the American Nation of Islam). Given such large gaps between the topics of the articles in the collection, one may conclude that material religion as a separate field of knowledge is still at the stage of formation. The review draws a disappointing conclusion that the authors’ interdisciplinary approach comes to a standstill, since the collection does not set a general framework and concepts. Referring to Ibn Arabi, the editor proclaims maximum freedom in choosing a research topic (“any subject is Islamic insofar as it is embodied by the force of the knowledge of the Creator”). Thus, materials on Indian talismans, Yemeni coins, American pins, and the Granada water system are collected under one cover—and all these topics still pretend to be united by the frame of religion.","PeriodicalId":52194,"journal":{"name":"Antropologicheskij Forum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antropologicheskij Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31250/1815-8870-2022-18-55-342-354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The new collection, edited by Anna Bigelow, expands the methodology of the material approach to religion through the authors’ close look at various aspects of Muslim life. Under the cover one can find articles by researchers of substantial expertise in their fields. Each article represents a statement on a separate topic (be it history, architecture, numismatics, art history, environmental studies, etc.). The works highlight both examples from the very heart of the Muslim world (Mecca), as well as cases that are considered to be peripheral or even marginal (historic Granada, Upper Volta, the American Nation of Islam). Given such large gaps between the topics of the articles in the collection, one may conclude that material religion as a separate field of knowledge is still at the stage of formation. The review draws a disappointing conclusion that the authors’ interdisciplinary approach comes to a standstill, since the collection does not set a general framework and concepts. Referring to Ibn Arabi, the editor proclaims maximum freedom in choosing a research topic (“any subject is Islamic insofar as it is embodied by the force of the knowledge of the Creator”). Thus, materials on Indian talismans, Yemeni coins, American pins, and the Granada water system are collected under one cover—and all these topics still pretend to be united by the frame of religion.
寻求解释的对象:ANNA BIGELOW(编辑)《通过对象的孤岛》综述。纽约:Bloomsbury Academic,2021,264页。
这本由安娜·毕格罗编辑的新书集通过作者对穆斯林生活各个方面的仔细观察,扩展了宗教的物质方法论。在封面下,人们可以找到在各自领域具有丰富专业知识的研究人员的文章。每一篇文章都代表了一个单独主题的陈述(无论是历史、建筑、钱币学、艺术史、环境研究等)。这些作品既突出了穆斯林世界(麦加)核心的例子,也突出了被认为是边缘甚至边缘的案例(历史悠久的格拉纳达、上沃尔特、美国伊斯兰国家)。鉴于该系列文章的主题之间存在如此大的差距,人们可以得出结论,物质宗教作为一个独立的知识领域仍处于形成阶段。该评论得出了一个令人失望的结论,即作者的跨学科方法陷入停滞,因为该系列没有设定一个总体框架和概念。在提到伊本·阿拉比时,编辑宣称在选择研究主题时享有最大的自由(“任何主题都是伊斯兰的,只要它是由造物主的知识力量体现的”)。因此,关于印度护身符、也门硬币、美国徽章和格拉纳达水系的材料被收集在一个封面下——所有这些主题仍然假装被宗教框架所统一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Antropologicheskij Forum
Antropologicheskij Forum Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信