Successful groups are seen as more agentic and therefore more human— Consequences for group perception

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Magdalena Formanowicz , Marta Witkowska , Maria Laura Bettinsoli , Paweł Jurek
{"title":"Successful groups are seen as more agentic and therefore more human— Consequences for group perception","authors":"Magdalena Formanowicz ,&nbsp;Marta Witkowska ,&nbsp;Maria Laura Bettinsoli ,&nbsp;Paweł Jurek","doi":"10.1016/j.jesp.2023.104490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Dehumanization predominantly affects groups facing structural inequalities and these groups often experience low agency in attaining satisfactory work and living conditions. Given that seeing groups as low in agency may underlie the association between social disadvantage and dehumanization, in seven preregistered studies (</span><em>N</em> = 1502), we examined how to raise the perceived agency of disadvantaged groups to increase their humanness ascriptions. Several groups were presented as either succeeding or failing in various contexts (e.g., fighting for human rights, building a community center, crossing the border). Additionally, in five of those studies we added a manipulation of self-relevance to further increase the ecological validity of the presented manipulations. Across all studies, and independent of other factors, success increased agency, which in turn translated to lower dehumanization. The results indicated that shifting the narrative regarding the disadvantaged groups to reflect their successes rather than failures can improve the perception of those groups.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48441,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Experimental Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103123000471","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Dehumanization predominantly affects groups facing structural inequalities and these groups often experience low agency in attaining satisfactory work and living conditions. Given that seeing groups as low in agency may underlie the association between social disadvantage and dehumanization, in seven preregistered studies (N = 1502), we examined how to raise the perceived agency of disadvantaged groups to increase their humanness ascriptions. Several groups were presented as either succeeding or failing in various contexts (e.g., fighting for human rights, building a community center, crossing the border). Additionally, in five of those studies we added a manipulation of self-relevance to further increase the ecological validity of the presented manipulations. Across all studies, and independent of other factors, success increased agency, which in turn translated to lower dehumanization. The results indicated that shifting the narrative regarding the disadvantaged groups to reflect their successes rather than failures can improve the perception of those groups.

成功的群体被视为更具能动性,因此更人性化——群体感知的后果
非人化主要影响到面临结构性不平等的群体,这些群体在获得令人满意的工作和生活条件方面往往缺乏能动性。鉴于将群体视为低能动性可能是社会劣势和非人化之间联系的基础,在七项预先登记的研究中(N=1502),我们研究了如何提高弱势群体的感知能动性,以增加他们的人性归属。有几个团体在各种情况下(例如,争取人权、建立社区中心、越境)被认为是成功或失败的。此外,在其中五项研究中,我们添加了自我相关性操作,以进一步提高所提出操作的生态有效性。在所有的研究中,独立于其他因素,成功增加了能动性,这反过来又转化为较低的非人化。研究结果表明,改变对弱势群体的叙述,以反映他们的成功而非失败,可以改善对这些群体的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
2.90%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: The Journal of Experimental Social Psychology publishes original research and theory on human social behavior and related phenomena. The journal emphasizes empirical, conceptually based research that advances an understanding of important social psychological processes. The journal also publishes literature reviews, theoretical analyses, and methodological comments.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信