{"title":"Aedicula Tombs and Statues in Rome: Reconsidering the Monument of Eurysaces","authors":"Crispin Corrado, A. Prieto, Maxwell Goldman","doi":"10.1086/724514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article revisits the well-known monument of Eurysaces in the context of the Roman funerary landscape. By focusing on its structure and original context, our research demonstrates that the monument, far from being a unicum, instead conformed to contemporary commemorative practices and was in many ways typical. Analysis of comparable monuments and funerary areas, as well as characterization of the concrete used, indicates that the monument of Eurysaces was originally an aedicula tomb with a superstructure, now missing. This reconstruction allows for a more convincing and traditional positioning of the relief images known as “Eurysaces and his wife” at the crowning level of this structure. While our research focuses on the monument of Eurysaces, an important and unexpected result has been the likely identification of several full-length portrait reliefs whose distinctive features suggest that they belong to a previously unrecognized corpus in Rome: aedicular statues. This designation explains the characteristics differentiating them from freestanding statues and helps fill the lacuna of evidence for Rome’s once robust group of funerary structures and ornamentation. The identification of these aedicular statues, in turn, reiterates the fact that aedicula tombs were once popular in the city’s funerary landscape, as they were across the Roman empire.1","PeriodicalId":7745,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Archaeology","volume":"127 1","pages":"365 - 396"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Archaeology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/724514","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article revisits the well-known monument of Eurysaces in the context of the Roman funerary landscape. By focusing on its structure and original context, our research demonstrates that the monument, far from being a unicum, instead conformed to contemporary commemorative practices and was in many ways typical. Analysis of comparable monuments and funerary areas, as well as characterization of the concrete used, indicates that the monument of Eurysaces was originally an aedicula tomb with a superstructure, now missing. This reconstruction allows for a more convincing and traditional positioning of the relief images known as “Eurysaces and his wife” at the crowning level of this structure. While our research focuses on the monument of Eurysaces, an important and unexpected result has been the likely identification of several full-length portrait reliefs whose distinctive features suggest that they belong to a previously unrecognized corpus in Rome: aedicular statues. This designation explains the characteristics differentiating them from freestanding statues and helps fill the lacuna of evidence for Rome’s once robust group of funerary structures and ornamentation. The identification of these aedicular statues, in turn, reiterates the fact that aedicula tombs were once popular in the city’s funerary landscape, as they were across the Roman empire.1
这篇文章在罗马葬礼景观的背景下重新审视了著名的欧里塞斯纪念碑。通过关注其结构和原始背景,我们的研究表明,这座纪念碑远非单一的纪念馆,而是符合当代的纪念惯例,在许多方面都是典型的。对类似纪念碑和墓地的分析,以及对所用混凝土的表征表明,Eurysaces纪念碑最初是一座带上层建筑的百科全书式坟墓,现在已经不见了。这种重建使被称为“Eurysaces and his wife”的浮雕图像能够在这个结构的最高层次上得到更令人信服的传统定位。虽然我们的研究重点是Eurysaces纪念碑,但一个重要而出乎意料的结果是,可能发现了几尊全身肖像浮雕,它们的独特特征表明,它们属于罗马一个以前未被承认的语料库:百科全书雕像。这一名称解释了它们与独立雕像的区别,并有助于填补罗马曾经坚固的陪葬结构和装饰群的证据空白。反过来,这些百科全书式雕像的鉴定再次证明了一个事实,即百科全书式坟墓曾经在该市的陪葬景观中很受欢迎,就像它们在整个罗马帝国一样。1