Variasi Penggunaan Strategi Kesantunan sebagai Penanda Subordinasi Mahasiswa dalam Interaksi Lisan Tertulis

Dian Budiarti
{"title":"Variasi Penggunaan Strategi Kesantunan sebagai Penanda Subordinasi Mahasiswa dalam Interaksi Lisan Tertulis","authors":"Dian Budiarti","doi":"10.30872/diglosia.v5i4.527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies on politeness strategies have been carried out in various fields. However, the study in the context of oral and written interactions is still limited. The purpose of this study is to present the use of students' language politeness strategies in oral and written interactions and to reveal the causes of differences in their choice of use. The primary data in this study were 50 instant message texts between students and lecturers. Data were analyzed using the categorization of politeness strategies from Brown & Levinson (1987), which was supported by data from interviews with 7 participants. This study found that 4 out of 5 categories of politeness strategies were used by students, which were dominated by negative politeness strategies. It indicates an awareness of the asymmetric power relationship between the two, which makes them feel the need to be careful so that what is conveyed does not threaten their faces. In addition, it was found that the reasons behind the variation in the use of politeness strategies were related to educational ritualism, looseness of domination of power, the intensity of interaction, and the purpose of sending messages.","PeriodicalId":33926,"journal":{"name":"Diglosia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diglosia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v5i4.527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies on politeness strategies have been carried out in various fields. However, the study in the context of oral and written interactions is still limited. The purpose of this study is to present the use of students' language politeness strategies in oral and written interactions and to reveal the causes of differences in their choice of use. The primary data in this study were 50 instant message texts between students and lecturers. Data were analyzed using the categorization of politeness strategies from Brown & Levinson (1987), which was supported by data from interviews with 7 participants. This study found that 4 out of 5 categories of politeness strategies were used by students, which were dominated by negative politeness strategies. It indicates an awareness of the asymmetric power relationship between the two, which makes them feel the need to be careful so that what is conveyed does not threaten their faces. In addition, it was found that the reasons behind the variation in the use of politeness strategies were related to educational ritualism, looseness of domination of power, the intensity of interaction, and the purpose of sending messages.
健康策略作为学生从属标记在书面Lisan互动中的使用变化
礼貌策略的研究已经在各个领域展开。然而,在口头和书面互动的背景下进行的研究仍然有限。本研究的目的是介绍学生在口语和书面互动中使用语言礼貌策略的情况,并揭示他们在使用选择上存在差异的原因。这项研究的主要数据是学生和讲师之间的50条即时信息。数据使用Brown&Levinson(1987)的礼貌策略分类进行分析,该分类得到了对7名参与者的采访数据的支持。本研究发现,在5类礼貌策略中,有4类是学生使用的,主要是消极礼貌策略。这表明他们意识到了两者之间的不对称权力关系,这让他们觉得有必要小心,这样传达的信息就不会威胁到他们的脸。此外,研究发现,礼貌策略使用差异背后的原因与教育仪式主义、权力支配的松散、互动的强度和发送信息的目的有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信