{"title":"STATUS PENGELOLAAN PERIKANAN SKALA KECIL BERBASIS ZONASI DI WILAYAH PERAIRAN KABUPATEN BANGKA","authors":"Yeyen Mardyani, Rahmat Kurnia, Luky Adrianto","doi":"10.15578/jkpi.11.2.2019.125-137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Pemanfaatan wilayah perairan di sekitar Pulau Bangka oleh sektor perikanan khususnya perikanan skala kecil semakin terdesak akibat daerah penangkapan ikan (DPI) yang semakin berkurang dikarenakan wilayah Izin Usaha Pertambangan (IUP) di laut semakin bertambah. Hal ini menyebabkan ruang gerak nelayan semakin sempit. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menilai status keragaan pengelolaan perikanan skala kecil berdasarkan Zona DPI yang dibagi menjadi 3, yaitu Zona A (DPI dengan IUP aktif), Zona A1 (DPI dengan IUP non aktif), dan Zona B (DPI tanpa IUP). Status keragaan dinilai melalui pendekatan Ecosystem Approach for Fisheries Management (EAFM) dengan menggunakan indikator pada domain sumberdaya ikan, habitat dan ekosistem, teknologi penangkapan ikan, sosial, ekonomi, dan kelembagaan. Hasil penilaian menunjukkan bahwa status pengelolaan perikanan pada masing-masing zona DPI yaitu Zona A dengan nilai total agregat sebesar 1.179,50 termasuk dalam kategori status sedang; Zona A1 dengan nilai total agregat 1.404,5 termasuk dalam kategori status baik, dan Zona B dengan nilai total agregat sebesar 1.377 yang termasuk kategori status sedang. Pengelolaan perikanan dengan keputusan taktis diprioritaskan pada indikator range collaps, kapasitas penangkapan, ekosistem terumbu karang, konflik perikanan, pendapatan nelayan, dan penguatan kelembagaan.The use of Bangka waters by the fisheries sector, especially small scale fisheries, is increasingly pushed due to the reduced fishing ground (DPI) because of the increasing area of the Sea Mining Business License (IUP). This causes less space for fishermen. This study aims to assess the performance status of small scale fisheries management based on the DPI Zone which is divided into 3, namely Zone A (DPI with active IUP), Zone A1 (DPI with non-active IUP), and Zone B (DPI without IUP). Performance status is assessed through the Ecosystem Approach for Fisheries Management (EAFM) approach using indicators in the domain of fish resources, habitat and ecosystem, fisheries technology, social, economic, and institutional. The assessment results indicate that the status of fisheries management in each DPI zone, namely Zone A with an aggregate total value of 1,179.50, is included in the medium status category; Zone A1 with a total aggregate value of 1,404.5 is included in the good status category, and Zone B with an aggregate value of 1,377 which is included in the medium status category. Fisheries management with tactical decisions are prioritized on indicators of range collapse, fishing capacity, coral reef ecosystems, fisheries conflicts, fishermen income, and institutional strengthening.","PeriodicalId":31078,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Kebijakan Perikanan Indonesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Kebijakan Perikanan Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15578/jkpi.11.2.2019.125-137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Pemanfaatan wilayah perairan di sekitar Pulau Bangka oleh sektor perikanan khususnya perikanan skala kecil semakin terdesak akibat daerah penangkapan ikan (DPI) yang semakin berkurang dikarenakan wilayah Izin Usaha Pertambangan (IUP) di laut semakin bertambah. Hal ini menyebabkan ruang gerak nelayan semakin sempit. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menilai status keragaan pengelolaan perikanan skala kecil berdasarkan Zona DPI yang dibagi menjadi 3, yaitu Zona A (DPI dengan IUP aktif), Zona A1 (DPI dengan IUP non aktif), dan Zona B (DPI tanpa IUP). Status keragaan dinilai melalui pendekatan Ecosystem Approach for Fisheries Management (EAFM) dengan menggunakan indikator pada domain sumberdaya ikan, habitat dan ekosistem, teknologi penangkapan ikan, sosial, ekonomi, dan kelembagaan. Hasil penilaian menunjukkan bahwa status pengelolaan perikanan pada masing-masing zona DPI yaitu Zona A dengan nilai total agregat sebesar 1.179,50 termasuk dalam kategori status sedang; Zona A1 dengan nilai total agregat 1.404,5 termasuk dalam kategori status baik, dan Zona B dengan nilai total agregat sebesar 1.377 yang termasuk kategori status sedang. Pengelolaan perikanan dengan keputusan taktis diprioritaskan pada indikator range collaps, kapasitas penangkapan, ekosistem terumbu karang, konflik perikanan, pendapatan nelayan, dan penguatan kelembagaan.The use of Bangka waters by the fisheries sector, especially small scale fisheries, is increasingly pushed due to the reduced fishing ground (DPI) because of the increasing area of the Sea Mining Business License (IUP). This causes less space for fishermen. This study aims to assess the performance status of small scale fisheries management based on the DPI Zone which is divided into 3, namely Zone A (DPI with active IUP), Zone A1 (DPI with non-active IUP), and Zone B (DPI without IUP). Performance status is assessed through the Ecosystem Approach for Fisheries Management (EAFM) approach using indicators in the domain of fish resources, habitat and ecosystem, fisheries technology, social, economic, and institutional. The assessment results indicate that the status of fisheries management in each DPI zone, namely Zone A with an aggregate total value of 1,179.50, is included in the medium status category; Zone A1 with a total aggregate value of 1,404.5 is included in the good status category, and Zone B with an aggregate value of 1,377 which is included in the medium status category. Fisheries management with tactical decisions are prioritized on indicators of range collapse, fishing capacity, coral reef ecosystems, fisheries conflicts, fishermen income, and institutional strengthening.