Online and active learning design in large-size classes: a phenomenological study

Giovanna Malusà, P. Ghislandi
{"title":"Online and active learning design in large-size classes: a phenomenological study","authors":"Giovanna Malusà, P. Ghislandi","doi":"10.2478/rem-2022-0018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper presents a qualitative–quantitative study that investigates whether an active and collaborative design can help university students positively evaluate the course, even in a large-size online class for special ed teachers. The analysis of the collected data (a fact-finding questionnaire created on purpose; a standard questionnaire for the course evaluation; field notes, design documentation; a class climate analysis questionnaire; an individual opinion poll about the educational activities; in-chat reflections of trainees) clearly testifies that trainees greatly appreciated the active and collaborative design. Some of the students hoped to be able to repeat a similar instructional design in their own classes, even though they underlined that this type of design often requires much more commitment, for the student and the teacher, than what is foreseen by the recognised credits. The results that can be achieved, in terms of Students’ Evaluation of Teaching (SET), are relevant if the teacher is properly trained to the introduction of pedagogical innovation, as also recalled by the European Union.","PeriodicalId":55657,"journal":{"name":"Research on Education and Media","volume":"14 1","pages":"22 - 32"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research on Education and Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/rem-2022-0018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This paper presents a qualitative–quantitative study that investigates whether an active and collaborative design can help university students positively evaluate the course, even in a large-size online class for special ed teachers. The analysis of the collected data (a fact-finding questionnaire created on purpose; a standard questionnaire for the course evaluation; field notes, design documentation; a class climate analysis questionnaire; an individual opinion poll about the educational activities; in-chat reflections of trainees) clearly testifies that trainees greatly appreciated the active and collaborative design. Some of the students hoped to be able to repeat a similar instructional design in their own classes, even though they underlined that this type of design often requires much more commitment, for the student and the teacher, than what is foreseen by the recognised credits. The results that can be achieved, in terms of Students’ Evaluation of Teaching (SET), are relevant if the teacher is properly trained to the introduction of pedagogical innovation, as also recalled by the European Union.
大班线上主动学习设计的现象学研究
摘要本文提出了一项定性-定量研究,旨在调查积极和协作的设计是否可以帮助大学生积极评价课程,即使是在为特殊教育教师开设的大型在线课程中也是如此。对收集到的数据(一份专门制作的实况调查问卷;一份课程评估标准问卷;现场笔记、设计文件;一份课堂气氛分析问卷;一项关于教育活动的个人民意调查;学员的聊天反思)的分析清楚地证明,学员非常欣赏这种积极和协作的设计。一些学生希望能够在自己的课堂上重复类似的教学设计,尽管他们强调,对于学生和老师来说,这种类型的设计通常需要比公认学分所预见的更多的承诺。正如欧盟所回顾的那样,如果教师接受了适当的教学创新培训,那么在学生教学评估方面可以取得的结果是相关的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信